Skip to main contentSkip to Content

II Samuel 9

שמואל ב׳ פרק ט׳

Section: נביאים · נביאים ראשונים | Book: II Samuel | Chapter: 9 of 24 | Day: 85 of 742

Date: May 7, 2026


קלאוד על הנ״ך

After the dense military and administrative summary of chapter 8, which catalogued David’s victories over Philistines, Moabites, Arameans, and Edomites and listed the officers of his consolidated kingdom, chapter 9 turns abruptly inward. The transition is striking: from the imperial chronicle of conquests and cabinet appointments, the narrative shifts to a single intimate scene at court. Radak captures the timing precisely, suggesting that David, having achieved victory and rest, now turns his mind to the oath he had sworn to Jonathan in I Samuel 20:14-17, and asks whether anyone of Saul’s house remains “with whom I can keep faith for the sake of Jonathan” (אעשה עמו חסד בעבור יהונתן). The juxtaposition is theological as well as literary: military power is shown to be hollow if it is not accompanied by covenant fidelity. Chapter 8 establishes David as a king the nations must reckon with; chapter 9 establishes him as a king bound by personal loyalty, a king whose private oaths still govern his public conduct.

The key term of the chapter is חסד, the covenantal loyalty that binds parties beyond the strict letter of obligation. The word recurs three times in the opening verses (1, 3, 7), and its second occurrence intensifies the first: David asks not merely for חסד but for חסד אלקים (verse 3), the kindness of God, signaling that this is not ordinary generosity but a sacred faithfulness that mirrors divine loyalty. This conduct stands in deliberate contrast to the standard practice of the ancient Near East, where a new dynasty would systematically eliminate every survivor of the previous house to forestall any future claim to the throne. David inverts this expectation: rather than hunting Saul’s heirs to destroy them, he searches for them to honor them. The chapter is thus a quiet but pointed defense of David’s character against any charge that he profited from Saul’s fall. The blood-guilt of Ish-bosheth’s assassins (chapter 4) and the dirge over Abner (chapter 3) had already established the pattern; here that pattern reaches its tender culmination.

The figure who comes forward is Mephiboshet (מפיבושת), Jonathan’s son, and the narrator carefully reminds us that he is “lame in his feet” (נכה רגלים, verse 3), with the closing verse repeating that “he was lame in both feet” (verse 13). This detail is not incidental. It recalls II Samuel 4:4, where the narrator interrupted the account of Ish-bosheth’s assassination to explain how Mephiboshet had been crippled at age five: when news came of Saul and Jonathan’s deaths at Gilboa, his nurse fled in panic and dropped him. His lameness is therefore the bodily inheritance of the catastrophe that ended Saul’s house, the visible mark of a dynasty’s collapse. Metzudat David and Radak both note Mephiboshet’s terror and self-effacement: he falls on his face, calls himself David’s servant, and protests, “What is your servant, that you should look upon a dead dog like me?” (כלב המת אשר כמוני, verse 8). He expects, by every convention of his era, to be summoned to the new king only to be killed.

David’s response (verse 7) is structured around the reassurance “Do not fear” (אל תירא) and contains three distinct gifts: the restoration of “all the land of Saul your father,” a permanent place at the king’s table, and the explicit framing of all this as חסד “for the sake of Jonathan your father.” Each element carries weight. The restored land is economic dignity, a household and patrimony that allow Mephiboshet to remain a man of standing rather than a dependent. The royal table is a daily, public restoration of honor, signaling to the entire court that the cripple from Lo-debar is no political prisoner but a son of the king’s covenant. And the explicit reference to Jonathan transforms the act from royal patronage into the keeping of a private vow. Ziva, formerly a servant of Saul, is appointed with his fifteen sons and twenty servants to work the estate, an arrangement whose enormous practical significance the narrator records carefully (verses 9-11), and whose volatile character will return with troubling force later in the book.

The chapter closes with a quiet domestic note: Mephiboshet had a young son named Mica (verse 12), and Mephiboshet himself ate continually at the king’s table. The repetition of “lame in both feet” in the final clause has the force of a refrain — the reader is meant to remember, even at the moment of greatest dignity, the wound that the house of Saul still carries. The peaceful tableau also casts a long shadow forward. The very arrangement that here demonstrates David’s loyalty — Ziva manages the property, Mephiboshet sits at court — will become the seedbed of the painful drama in chapters 16 and 19, when David flees from Absalom. There Ziva will accuse Mephiboshet of treason and obtain his estate, and Mephiboshet will later protest his innocence in disheveled grief, leaving David to split the inheritance between them in a verdict that has troubled commentators for centuries. Chapter 9 thus stands at a hinge: it is at once the moral high point of David’s loyalty to Jonathan and the structural setup for one of the more morally ambiguous episodes still to come. The חסד is real; but in the unfolding politics of David’s house, even חסד will not be allowed to remain uncomplicated.


פרק ט׳ · Chapter 9

פסוק א׳ · Verse 1

Hebrew:

וַיֹּ֣אמֶר דָּוִ֔ד הֲכִ֣י יֶשׁ־ע֔וֹד אֲשֶׁ֥ר נוֹתַ֖ר לְבֵ֣ית שָׁא֑וּל וְאֶעֱשֶׂ֤ה עִמּוֹ֙ חֶ֔סֶד בַּעֲב֖וּר יְהוֹנָתָֽן׃

English:

David inquired, “Is there anyone still left of the House of Saul with whom I can keep faith for the sake of Jonathan?”

David inquires whether anyone remains of Saul's house with whom he can fulfill his oath of חסד to Jonathan. Radak observes that David, having now achieved military victory and rest, turned his thoughts back to his covenant with Jonathan (1 Samuel 20:14-15), seeking to honor it by elevating any worthy descendant — a remarkable gesture toward the family of his predecessor and former enemy.

פסוק ב׳ · Verse 2

Hebrew:

וּלְבֵ֨ית שָׁא֥וּל עֶ֙בֶד֙ וּשְׁמ֣וֹ צִיבָ֔א וַיִּקְרְאוּ־ל֖וֹ אֶל־דָּוִ֑ד וַיֹּ֨אמֶר הַמֶּ֧לֶךְ אֵלָ֛יו הַאַתָּ֥ה צִיבָ֖א וַיֹּ֥אמֶר עַבְדֶּֽךָ׃

English:

There was a servant of the House of Saul named Ziba, and they summoned him to David. “Are you Ziba?” the king asked him. “Yes, sir,“aYes, sir Lit. “Your servant is.” he replied.

Ziba, a former servant of Saul's house, is summoned and confirms his identity to David. Both Metzudat David and Radak identify Ziba as a Canaanite slave (עבד כנעני) who, along with his sons and possessions, was inherited property attached to the household of Saul — context that becomes essential later when David transfers ownership of the estate.

פסוק ג׳ · Verse 3

Hebrew:

וַיֹּ֣אמֶר הַמֶּ֗לֶךְ הַאֶ֨פֶס ע֥וֹד אִישׁ֙ ל��בֵ֣ית שָׁא֔וּל וְאֶעֱשֶׂ֥ה עִמּ֖וֹ חֶ֣סֶד אֱלֹהִ֑ים וַיֹּ֤אמֶר צִיבָא֙ אֶל־הַמֶּ֔לֶךְ ע֛וֹד בֵּ֥ן לִיהוֹנָתָ֖ן נְכֵ֥ה רַגְלָֽיִם׃

English:

The king continued, “Is there any member of the House of Saul left with whom I can keep faith as pledged before God?“bas pledged before God See 1 Sam. 20.14 and note. Ziba answered the king, “Yes, there is still a son of Jonathan whose feet are crippled.”

David presses further, asking if anyone remains so he can show חסד אלהים — kindness 'as pledged before God.' Radak explains the phrase as referring to the oath sworn before God between David and Jonathan, while Metzudat David adds that joining a word to 'God' magnifies it (cf. חרדת אלהים), signaling the magnitude of the kindness David intends. Ziba reveals that Jonathan's son survives, but is lame in both feet.

פסוק ד׳ · Verse 4

Hebrew:

וַיֹּֽאמֶר־ל֥וֹ הַמֶּ֖לֶךְ אֵיפֹ֣ה ה֑וּא וַיֹּ֤אמֶר צִיבָא֙ אֶל־הַמֶּ֔לֶךְ הִנֵּה־ה֗וּא בֵּ֛ית מָכִ֥יר בֶּן־עַמִּיאֵ֖ל בְּל֥וֹ דְבָֽר׃

English:

“Where is he?” the king asked, and Ziba said to the king, “He is in the house of Machir son of Ammiel, in Lo-debar.”

Ziba reveals that Mephiboshet has been hiding in the house of Machir son of Ammiel in Lo-debar, a town in Transjordan. The location is significant — Lo-debar (לוֹ דְבָר, literally 'no thing') is a place of obscurity east of the Jordan, far from the political center, where the disgraced remnant of Saul's house has taken refuge. Radak notes that Lo-debar is a place name (שם מקום); the same Machir later appears in chapter 17 as a loyal supporter of David during Absalom's revolt.

פסוק ה׳ · Verse 5

Hebrew:

וַיִּשְׁלַ֖ח הַמֶּ֣לֶךְ דָּוִ֑ד וַיִּקָּחֵ֗הוּ מִבֵּ֛ית מָכִ֥יר בֶּן־עַמִּיאֵ֖ל מִלּ֥וֹ דְבָֽר׃

English:

King David had him brought from the house of Machir son of Ammiel, at Lo-debar;


פסוק ו׳ · Verse 6

Hebrew:

וַ֠יָּבֹ֠א מְפִיבֹ֨שֶׁת בֶּן־יְהוֹנָתָ֤ן בֶּן־שָׁאוּל֙ אֶל־דָּוִ֔ד וַיִּפֹּ֥ל עַל־פָּנָ֖יו וַיִּשְׁתָּ֑חוּ וַיֹּ֤אמֶר דָּוִד֙ מְפִיבֹ֔שֶׁת וַיֹּ֖אמֶר הִנֵּ֥ה עַבְדֶּֽךָ׃

English:

and when Mephibosheth son of Jonathan son of Saul came to David, he flung himself on his face and prostrated himself. David said, “Mephibosheth!” and he replied, “At your service, sir.”

Mephiboshet enters David's presence, prostrates himself, and answers David's calling of his name with 'Behold your servant.' Metzudat David captures the dramatic tension: Mephiboshet assumed he had been summoned for execution as the surviving heir of the rival Saulide dynasty, and his prostration signals submission and readiness to accept whatever punishment David would decree — making David's next words all the more astonishing.

פסוק ז׳ · Verse 7

Hebrew:

וַיֹּ֩אמֶר֩ ל֨וֹ דָוִ֜ד אַל־תִּירָ֗א כִּ֣י עָשֹׂה֩ אֶעֱשֶׂ֨ה עִמְּךָ֥ חֶ֙סֶד֙ בַּֽעֲבוּר֙ יְהוֹנָתָ֣ן אָבִ֔יךָ וַהֲשִׁבֹתִ֣י לְךָ֔ אֶֽת־כׇּל־שְׂדֵ֖ה שָׁא֣וּל אָבִ֑יךָ וְאַתָּ֗ה תֹּ֥אכַל לֶ֛חֶם עַל־שֻׁלְחָנִ֖י תָּמִֽיד׃

English:

David said to him, “Don’t be afraid, for I will keep faith with you for the sake of your father Jonathan. I will give you back all the land of your grandfather Saul; moreover, you shall always eat at my table.”

David's reassurance is the heart of the chapter — 'Do not fear,' for Jonathan's sake he will restore all of Saul's land and grant Mephiboshet a permanent place at the royal table. Radak wrestles with how David could give the land to Mephiboshet at all, since either it was already his by inheritance, or it had been seized as crown property after the Saulides' rebellion against the divinely-anointed David; Radak concludes that the true חסד lies in restoring the entire estate AND in granting Mephiboshet the dignity of being a permanent dinner companion of the king.

פסוק ח׳ · Verse 8

Hebrew:

וַיִּשְׁתַּ֕חוּ וַיֹּ֖אמֶר מֶ֣ה עַבְדֶּ֑ךָ כִּ֣י פָנִ֔יתָ אֶל־הַכֶּ֥לֶב הַמֵּ֖ת אֲשֶׁ֥ר כָּמֽוֹנִי׃

English:

[Mephibosheth] prostrated himself again, and said, “What is your servant, that you should show regard for a dead dog like me?”

Overwhelmed by David's kindness, Mephiboshet prostrates a second time and calls himself a 'dead dog' (כֶּלֶב הַמֵּת) — the most extreme image of self-effacement available in biblical idiom. Metzudat David explains the phrase as 'what is your servant considered — as nothing'; the metaphor combines uselessness (a dog, lowly) with lifelessness (dead, harmless), conveying that Mephiboshet sees himself as completely beneath any consideration of royal honor.

פסוק ט׳ · Verse 9

Hebrew:

וַיִּקְרָ֣א הַמֶּ֗לֶךְ אֶל־צִיבָ֛א נַ֥עַר שָׁא֖וּל וַיֹּ֣אמֶר אֵלָ֑יו כֹּל֩ אֲשֶׁ֨ר הָיָ֤ה לְשָׁאוּל֙ וּלְכׇל־בֵּית֔וֹ נָתַ֖תִּי לְבֶן־אֲדֹנֶֽיךָ׃

English:

The king summoned Ziba, Saul’s steward, and said to him, “I give to your master’s grandson everything that belonged to Saul and to his entire family.

David formally transfers all of Saul's estate to Mephiboshet, addressing Ziba directly as the steward who must implement the order. Rashi cites the Talmudic principle (Sanhedrin 20b) that a king has the legal authority to transfer an inheritance from one party to another, anchored in the 'law of the king' in 1 Samuel 8:14 — the verse explains the legal mechanism by which David has the power to make this grant.
Commentaries (1)
רש״יRashi
נָתַתִּי לְבֶן אֲדֹנֶיךָ. הַמֶּלֶךְ רַשַּׁאי לְהַעֲבִיר נַחֲלָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר בְּמִשְׁפַּט הַמְּלוּכָה (שמואל א ח:יד): ״וְאֶת שְׂדוֹתֵיכֶם וְאֶת כַּרְמֵיכֶם וְגוֹ׳ יִקַּח וְנָתַן לַעֲבָדָיו״:
I have given to the son of your master. The king is permitted to transfer an estate1From its previous rightful owner to another person of his choice. This is Rebbe Yosi's view in Sanhedrin 20b that those royal powers spoken of in Shmuel are to be taken literally as belonging to the king and not just a means of frightening the people into respecting the king which is Rebbe Yehudi's view there in Sanhedrin, (See also Tosfos, ibid). as it is said (Shmuel I, 8:14) Within the jurisdiction of the monarchy is [the power] to take their fields and their vineyards and to give it to his servants.

פסוק י״ · Verse 10

Hebrew:

וְעָבַ֣דְתָּ לּ֣וֹ אֶֽת־הָאֲדָמָ֡ה אַתָּה֩ וּבָנֶ֨יךָ וַעֲבָדֶ֜יךָ וְהֵבֵ֗אתָ וְהָיָ֨ה לְבֶן־אֲדֹנֶ֤יךָ לֶּ֙חֶם֙ וַאֲכָל֔וֹ וּמְפִיבֹ֙שֶׁת֙ בֶּן־אֲדֹנֶ֔יךָ יֹאכַ֥ל תָּמִ֛יד לֶ֖חֶם עַל־שֻׁלְחָנִ֑י וּלְצִיבָ֗א חֲמִשָּׁ֥ה עָשָׂ֛ר בָּנִ֖ים וְעֶשְׂרִ֥ים עֲבָדִֽים׃

English:

You and your sons and your slaves shall farm the land for him and shall bring in [its yield] to provide food for your master’s grandsoncgrandson Septuagint reads “household.” to live on; but Mephibosheth, your master’s grandson, shall always eat at my table.”—Ziba had fifteen sons and twenty slaves.—

David details the practical arrangement: Ziba and his fifteen sons and twenty servants are to farm the land and bring its produce to provide for Mephiboshet's household, while Mephiboshet himself eats permanently at the king's table. Metzudat David and Radak both clarify that the phrase 'son of your master' here refers to Mica, Mephiboshet's young son (introduced in v. 12), since the produce must support the household even as Mephiboshet himself dines royally. The note about Ziba's fifteen sons and twenty servants quietly establishes that this is a substantial labor force — Saul's estate was vast.

פסוק י״א · Verse 11

Hebrew:

וַיֹּ֤אמֶר צִיבָא֙ אֶל־הַמֶּ֔לֶךְ כְּכֹל֩ אֲשֶׁ֨ר יְצַוֶּ֜ה אֲדֹנִ֤י הַמֶּ֙לֶךְ֙ אֶת־עַבְדּ֔וֹ כֵּ֖ן יַעֲשֶׂ֣ה עַבְדֶּ֑ךָ וּמְפִיבֹ֗שֶׁת אֹכֵל֙ עַל־שֻׁלְחָנִ֔י כְּאַח��֖ד מִבְּנֵ֥י הַמֶּֽלֶךְ׃

English:

Ziba said to the king, “Your servant will do just as my lord the king has commanded him.” “Mephibosheth shall eat at my tabledMephibosheth shall eat at my table Septuagint reads “And Mephibosheth ate at David’s table.” like one of the king’s sons.”

Ziba accepts the assignment, and the verse ends with the declaration that Mephiboshet shall eat at the king's table 'like one of the king's sons.' Rashi splits the verse between two speakers: Ziba says only 'so will your servant do,' and David responds with the formal declaration 'Mephiboshet will eat at my table' — making the elevation a royal proclamation. Either way, the comparison 'like one of the king's sons' (כְּאַחַד מִבְּנֵי הַמֶּלֶךְ) marks an extraordinary status: the surviving Saulide is grafted into David's own household.
Commentaries (1)
רש״יRashi
כֵּן יַעֲשֶׂה עַבְדֶּךָ וּמְפִיבֹשֶׁת אֹכֵל עַל שֻׁלְחָנִי. צִיבָא אָמַר: כֵּן יַעֲשֶׂה עַבְדֶּךָ, וְדָוִד הֵשִׁיב: וּמְפִיבֹשֶׁת אֹכֵל עַל שֻׁלְחָנִי:
So will your servant do. Mephivoshes will eat at my table. Tsivoh said, "So will your servant do." And Dovid responded, "Mephivoshes will eat at my table."2The verse contains the words of two separate speakers, Tzivoh is speaking in the first part of the verse and Dovid responds in the second part.

פסוק י״ב · Verse 12

Hebrew:

וְלִמְפִיבֹ֥שֶׁת בֵּן־קָטָ֖ן וּשְׁמ֣וֹ מִיכָ֑א וְכֹל֙ מוֹשַׁ֣ב בֵּית־צִיבָ֔א עֲבָדִ֖ים לִמְפִיבֹֽשֶׁת׃

English:

Mephibosheth had a young son named Mica; and all the members of Ziba’s household worked for Mephibosheth.

The verse introduces Mephiboshet's young son Mica — through whom the line of Saul and Jonathan will continue (cf. 1 Chronicles 8:34-40) — and notes that the entire household of Ziba serves Mephiboshet. Rashi and Radak both clarify that 'all who dwelled in Ziba's house' encompasses his sons and his slaves and all the members of his household, indicating that the labor force assigned to Mephiboshet is the full extended Ziba clan, the surviving infrastructure of Saul's old royal estate.
Commentaries (1)
רש״יRashi
מוֹשַׁב בֵּית צִיבָא. בָּנָיו וַעֲבָדָיו:
Those who dwelled in the house of Tsivoh. His children and his slaves.3Mentioned in verse 10.

פסוק י״ג · Verse 13

Hebrew:

וּמְפִיבֹ֗שֶׁת יֹשֵׁב֙ בִּיר֣וּשָׁלַ֔͏ִם כִּ֣י עַל־שֻׁלְחַ֥ן הַמֶּ֛לֶךְ תָּמִ֖יד ה֣וּא אֹכֵ֑ל וְה֥וּא פִסֵּ֖חַ שְׁתֵּ֥י רַגְלָֽיו׃ {פ}

English:

Mephibosheth lived in Jerusalem, for he ate regularly at the king’s table. He was lame in both feet.


II Samuel 8 | II Samuel 10

Back to II Samuel | Back to Nach Yomi

Last updated on