Skip to Content
Parashat HaShavuaפרשת צוParashat Tzav

פרשת צו — Parashat Tzav

Leviticus (ויקרא) | 6:1 – 8:36

קלאוד על הפרשה

Parashat Tzav opens with a word that immediately signals a shift in tone and urgency from the preceding parasha. Whereas Vayikra addressed the Israelites as the ones who bring offerings — “Speak unto the children of Israel” (Leviticus 1:2) — Tzav turns to the priests who perform the sacred rites: “Command Aaron and his sons” (Leviticus 6:2). As Ramban explains, Vayikra dealt with the bringing of the offerings, which is the obligation of the Israelites, while Tzav concerns the detailed procedures of the sacrificial service, which belong exclusively to the kohanim. The very word “tzav” (command) carries a force that the softer “speak” or “say” does not. Rashi, citing the Sifra and Kiddushin 29a, notes that the expression “command” always implies urging — both for immediate fulfillment and as a binding obligation for all future generations. Rabbi Shimon adds that Scripture especially urges compliance where monetary loss is involved, though Ramban famously disagrees, arguing that the priests derive benefit from all offerings, including the burnt-offering through its hide, and that Rabbi Shimon’s principle applies elsewhere.

The parasha’s opening sections revisit each of the offering types introduced in Vayikra — the olah (burnt-offering), the minchah (meal-offering), the chattat (sin-offering), the asham (guilt-offering), and the shelamim (peace-offering) — but from an entirely different vantage point. Where Vayikra described what the Israelite donor must do, Tzav prescribes what the kohen must do once the animal or flour reaches the altar. This includes detailed rules about the removal of ashes (terumat ha-deshen), the priestly garments worn for different stages of the service, how and where the offerings are consumed, and which portions belong to which kohanim. These are not mere ritual technicalities; they establish a theology of sacred labor, defining the priesthood not as a position of privilege alone but as one of exacting responsibility. The Torah specifies, for instance, that the kohen must change his garments before carrying the ashes outside the camp — a detail the Talmud (Yoma 23b) and commentators understand as a lesson in dignity and propriety even in the humblest aspects of divine service.

At the heart of the parasha’s sacrificial legislation stands the command of the perpetual fire: “A permanent fire shall burn upon the altar; it shall not go out” (Leviticus 6:6). Rashi notes that one who extinguishes the altar fire transgresses two negative commandments. Ramban, characteristically, offers a more nuanced reading: the first prohibition (verse 5) is addressed to the priests, commanding them to maintain the fire through diligent tending and the arrangement of sufficient wood; the second (verse 6) extends to any person who deliberately extinguishes even a single coal. The Sages taught that a second wood-pile (ma’arakhah sheniyah) was maintained on the altar solely to ensure the fire’s continuity (Yoma 45b). This unquenchable flame became one of the most enduring symbols in Jewish thought — a representation of the ceaseless devotion that the service of God demands, and, by later extension, the inner fire of Torah study and prayer that must never be allowed to die.

Tzav also introduces the distinctive offering of Aaron and his sons — the chavitin, a daily meal-offering brought by the High Priest each morning and evening, prepared on a griddle with oil. Rashi on Leviticus 6:13 explains that while ordinary priests bring such an offering only on the day of their installation into service, the High Priest brings one every single day as a perpetual obligation. This detail underscores a recurring theme of the parasha: the priesthood is not a one-time appointment but a continuous state of consecration. The meal-offering of the kohen, unlike that of an Israelite, is entirely consumed on the altar — it may not be eaten. The message is striking: the priest who serves as intermediary between Israel and God cannot be the beneficiary of his own offering. His role demands a measure of self-abnegation that goes beyond what is asked of the ordinary worshipper.

The parasha’s second half shifts from law to narrative, describing the inauguration ceremony of Aaron and his sons (Leviticus 8). Moses assembles the entire congregation at the entrance of the Tent of Meeting, dresses Aaron in the priestly vestments, anoints the Tabernacle and its vessels with the sacred oil, and then performs a sequence of three offerings: a sin-offering bull, a burnt-offering ram, and the ram of consecration (eil ha-miluim), whose blood is placed on the right ear, thumb, and big toe of each priest. Rashi on Leviticus 8:2 notes that the command “Take Aaron” means to persuade him with words, drawing him toward his new role — a reading that suggests Aaron needed encouragement, perhaps in light of the heavy burden being placed upon him. Ramban disagrees sharply with Rashi’s view that this section was spoken before the final erection of the Tabernacle, insisting instead that every section of the Torah here follows strict chronological order: God first taught Moses the laws of the offerings (Vayikra), and only then, at the proper moment, commanded him to consecrate Aaron and his sons.

The parasha concludes with the instruction that Aaron and his sons must remain at the entrance of the Tent of Meeting for seven days and seven nights, completing the period of miluim — installation or “filling” — without departing (Leviticus 8:33-36). This seven-day sequestration mirrors the seven days of creation, suggesting that the inauguration of the priesthood and the sacrificial order represents a kind of re-creation, the establishment of a channel through which the divine presence will dwell in the midst of Israel. The final verse records that “Aaron and his sons did all the things which the Lord commanded by the hand of Moses” — a note of faithful obedience that sets the stage for the dramatic events of Shemini, the eighth day, when the Divine Presence will at last descend upon the Tabernacle. Tzav thus serves as the essential bridge between the theoretical framework of Vayikra and the living reality of the sacrificial service, transforming abstract law into embodied practice and consecrating an entire family to the perpetual work of standing before God on behalf of Israel.

Aliyot

← Back to Parashat HaShavua

Last updated on
Aliyah 7 — שביעיLearning Calendars - Daf Yomi & Mishna Yomi Schedules