Skip to main contentSkip to Content

Jeremiah 16

ื™ืจืžื™ื”ื• ืคืจืง ื˜ืดื–

Section: ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ยท ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ืื—ืจื•ื ื™ื | Book: Jeremiah | Chapter: 16 of 52 | Day: 229 of 742

Date: September 28, 2026


ืงืœืื•ื“ ืขืœ ื”ื ืดืš

Every prophet in Tanakh is given things to say. Yirmiyahu, in chapter 16, is given things not to do, and the chapter is unique in all of Scripture for it. Three times the word comes to him in the negative - lo tikach lecha ishah, do not take a wife; al tavo beit marzeach, do not enter the house of mourning; uveit mishteh lo tavo, and the house of feasting you shall not enter. The ordinary prophetic sign-act is an addition to a life: Yeshayahu walks barefoot, Yechezkel lies on his side and bakes bread over dung, Yirmiyahu himself will wear a yoke through the streets and bury a linen sash by the Euphrates. Those are performances, costumes put on and taken off. What chapter 16 demands is not a performance but a subtraction, and a permanent one. The prophet is to be made into a sign by what is removed from him - wife, children, the mournerโ€™s house, the wedding feast. Radakโ€™s long comment on verse 2 registers how difficult this is by refusing to accept the obvious reading; he opens with the word mevuchah, perplexity, and piles up objection after objection. Why would God forbid a prophet to have children? If the decree is that children born in this place will die, surely Yirmiyahuโ€™s own children would have lived on his merit; and in any case young children die only for their fathersโ€™ sin, and Yirmiyahu had no such sin; and in any case the decree was not total, since Yechezkel foresees a remnant in Yerushalayim, banim uvanot among them. His resolution is to narrow bamakom hazeh to Anatot - the prophecy was spoken there, and it was of Anatot that chapter 11 said ushโ€™erit lo tihyeh lahem, a remnant they shall not have. A righteous man caught inside a condemned city is not exempt; Lot was told pen tisafeh baโ€™avon haโ€™ir. Whether or not one follows Radakโ€™s geography, the instinct behind his struggle is exactly right. The commentators do not treat celibacy as a natural prophetic asceticism. They treat it as an anomaly requiring justification, because a prophet is not ordinarily exempt from peru urvu, and a childless Israelite is not a more spiritual Israelite but a truncated one. That is the force of the exception. The command is not asceticism; it is mercy in the form of deprivation. The children not born cannot be eaten by dogs. And the reason given in verses 3 and 4 is stated with a brutality the translations can barely carry. Concerning the sons and daughters hailodim bamakom hazeh, and concerning the mothers who bear them and the fathers who beget them: memotei tachaluim yamutu, they shall die the deaths of sicknesses. Metzudat David and Radak both identify the tachaluim by cross-reference to chapter 14, tachaluโ€™ei raav, the wasting sicknesses of famine - not plague as an independent visitation but the slow dying that siege produces. Then lo yisafdu vโ€™lo yikaveru, not lamented and not buried, and the image that gives the chapter its floor: lโ€™domen al pnei haโ€™adamah yihyu, they shall be as dung upon the face of the earth. Metzudat David explains the mechanics with dreadful practicality - there will be no eulogy because everyone will be too consumed by his own disaster, and no burial because the dead will be too many and there will not be time, so they will lie flung on the ground like manure. Radak says the same in four words: each man will be too occupied with himself. This is the first of the chapterโ€™s great inversions. To be unburied is, in the moral vocabulary of Tanakh, the worst thing that can happen to a body; it is the curse pronounced on Yehoyakim and on Achav, and the thing Rizpah bat Ayah guarded her sonsโ€™ corpses against. Here it becomes the general condition. And note what the Hebrew does with the word domen - dung is not merely refuse but fertilizer, the thing scattered on a field to make it yield. A people that filled the land with nivlat shikutzeihem, the carcasses of their abominations, as verse 18 will put it, becomes itself the carcass spread upon the land. The verse closes with the beasts and birds, vโ€™haytah nivlatam lโ€™maachal lโ€™of hashamayim ulvehemat haโ€™aretz, which Metzudat David ties back to the non-burial as its direct consequence: unburied means eaten.

The second and third prohibitions complete the subtraction by closing the two doors through which an ordinary person enters the life of his community. Al tavo beit marzeach - do not come to the house of marzeach. Radak reports that Chazal read marzeach as a house of mourning, and cites vesar marzach seruchim from Amos; his father read the root as the raising of the voice, whether in weeping or in rejoicing, noting the same sense in Arabic. Rashi, remarkably, reads mishteh, a feast, citing the Sifrei on Baal Peor where the nations returned to make marzichin for themselves, before recording that our Rabbis explained it as mourning. The ambiguity is almost certainly the verseโ€™s own; the marzeach is the gathering where a community performs its emotion in public, and the prophet is barred from both halves of it. What follows is the theological core of the prohibition: ki asafti et shlomi meโ€™et haโ€™am hazeh, for I have gathered in My peace from this people - et hachesed vโ€™et harachamim. Rashiโ€™s gloss on asafti is among his finest. When Avraham their father did tzedakah and mishpat, I gave his children chesed and rachamim, as Devarim promises vโ€™shamar Hashem Elokecha lecha et habrit vโ€™et hachesed and vโ€™natan lecha rachamim. They turned mishpat into wormwood and cast tzedakah to the ground - he is quoting Amos - and so I too have turned and gathered in to Myself My chesed and My rachamim. The verb is asaf, the same verb Rachel uses when she says asaf Elokim et cherpati, God has gathered in my disgrace. Chesed and rachamim were not abolished; they were withdrawn, taken back in, and Radak draws the practical inference with perfect logic: since I have gathered in My own shalom from them, you are not to inquire after their shalom either - not in their mourning and not in their rejoicing. The prophetโ€™s social behavior is made an exact mimicry of the divine posture. Verses 6 and 7 then itemize what will no longer happen, and the list is a complete inventory of Jewish mourning practice seen from the outside: no burial, no lament, no gashing and no tonsure - which both Rashi and Radak are careful to note are forbidden to Israel in any case, lo titgodedu, lo tasimu korchah, and which are mentioned here only as the recognizable shape of grief, perhaps because the people had in fact adopted the customs of the nations in this as in so much else - no breaking of bread for the mourner, which Rashi identifies with the seudat havraah given to mourners in the city square with the blessing of hamotzi broken over it, and no cup of consolation for a man mourning his father or his mother. And then the third door: uveit mishteh lo tavo lashevet otam leโ€™echol vโ€™lishtot. Rashi supplies the connective - the reason for the feasting prohibition is the verse that follows - and Metzudat David specifies a wedding feast, adding lโ€™maan heyot lahem lโ€™mofet vโ€™ot, so that you shall be to them a portent and a sign. Verse 9 delivers the reason in the most famous cadence in the book: hinโ€™ni mashbit min hamakom hazeh lโ€™eineichem uvimeichem kol sason vโ€™kol simchah kol chatan vโ€™kol kallah. Before your eyes and in your days - Metzudat David says the doubling is emphasis, this will not be deferred to your grandchildren. These are the same seven sounds whose cessation closes chapter 7, and the tradition has done something extraordinary with them: the last of the sheva berachot recited under every chuppah in the world is built from this verse read backwards, kol sason vโ€™kol simchah kol chatan vโ€™kol kallah restored to the cities of Yehudah and the streets of Yerushalayim, so that the moment a bride and groom are most alone with their joy, the congregation quotes Yirmiyahuโ€™s sentence of desolation in its inverted form. Yirmiyahu will himself perform the inversion in chapter 33. But here the line runs only one way, and the man forbidden to marry is the one commanded to announce it.

Then, in verse 10, the chapter turns on a question, and the question is its hinge. When you tell this people all these words they will say to you: al meh diber Hashem aleinu et kol haraโ€™ah hagedolah hazot, umeh avoneinu umeh chatateinu asher chatanu laHashem Eloheinu - for what has the Lord spoken against us all this great evil, and what is our iniquity and what is our sin that we have sinned against the Lord our God? It is worth pausing on how astonishing this is. It is not defiance, and not the sneering eifoh devar Hashem yavo na of chapter 17; it is a sincere and apparently bewildered request for the charge sheet, asked by people who use the phrase laHashem Eloheinu with complete assurance. This is the voice of a generation in which idolatry has become so thoroughly domestic that it no longer registers as idolatry; chapter 11 had already counted the gods by towns and the altars by streets, and a sin distributed that evenly is invisible to those living inside it. The answer in verse 11 and 12 is not a new indictment but a genealogy. On account of your fathers, who forsook Me and walked after other gods and served them and bowed to them, vโ€™oti azavu vโ€™et torati lo shamaru - and Metzudat David reads those last words as one thought, they did not believe in Me in their hearts and therefore did not keep My Torah, making unbelief the root and non-observance the symptom. And then verse 12 closes the trap: vโ€™atem hareโ€™otem laโ€™asot meโ€™avoteichem, and you have done worse than your fathers - you asked what your sin is; your sin is that you are the next instalment of theirs, and a worse one. Metzudat David glosses hareโ€™otem simply as you did evil still more than your fathers did, and on lebilti shmoa elai he makes the sharpest observation in the chapter: the whole substance of the desire is not to listen to Me. The appetite is not for the idol; the appetite is for the absence of the commanding voice. Radak adds the juridical frame that makes the generational argument legitimate rather than unjust - pokeid avon avot al banim applies kesheochazin maaseh avoteihem biyedeihem, when they are holding their fathersโ€™ deeds in their own hands. The fathersโ€™ sin is visited only on sons who have taken it up and continued it. So the answer to meh avoneinu is not an accusation from outside but a mirror: you do not know what your sin is because you have inherited it so completely that you cannot see its edges. The sentence in verse 13 follows: vโ€™hetalti etchem - Radak glosses hetalti as hishlachti, I will hurl - off this land onto a land you and your fathers have not known, vaโ€™avadtem sham et elohim acherim yomam valaylah. Rashi and Radak both follow the Targum here: you will serve there the nations that worship idols, day and night. Metzudat David draws out the cruelty of the measure-for-measure - because I will not give you chen in the eyes of the nations, you will serve them day and night and find no rest. The men who wanted a god they could make will get gods they cannot put down.

And then, with no transition whatever, verse 14: lachen hinei yamim baโ€™im. Rashiโ€™s first word on it is the key to the whole passage - lachen is a language of oath, and although you betrayed Me, I hold an oath in My hand that I will redeem you. The oath formula by which Israel swears will change. Vโ€™lo yeiโ€™amer od chai Hashem asher heโ€™elah et bnei Yisrael meโ€™eretz Mitzrayim, ki im chai Hashem asher heโ€™elah et bnei Yisrael meโ€™eretz tzafon umikol haโ€™aratzot asher hidicham shamah. Radak explains the idiom: when a man swears by the Living God he attaches to the Name some deed or wonder - Tzidkiyahu swore chai Hashem asher asah lanu et hanefesh hazot - and the deed that has anchored every Jewish oath since the wilderness is the exodus from Mitzrayim. The claim of these two verses is that the anchor will be replaced. Rashi cites the Gemara in Berachot: not that yetziat Mitzrayim is uprooted from its place, but that the final redemption becomes ikar and the exodus from Egypt becomes tafel to it, secondary. Radak reports the machloket openly - some say the exodus will not be mentioned at all, some that it will be mentioned but that the subjugation under the kingdoms will be the principal thing and Egypt the appendix. Metzudat David supplies the logic that makes it proportionate: because the troubles will be so very many, the redemption from Bavel will be weightier, so that men will swear by it instead. Hold the claim steady for a moment, because it is one of the largest in the Neviโ€™im. The exodus is the founding event of Israelโ€™s existence, the first word of the Decalogue, the reason given for Shabbat and for kashrut and for the obligation to the stranger, the thing remembered twice daily and retold every year. Yirmiyahuโ€™s oracle says there is coming a deliverance in comparison with which that will be the lesser story. And it is placed here, immediately after the sentence of exile and the threefold stripping of the prophetโ€™s life, which is the structural argument of the chapter: the same God who gathers in His chesed has an oath in His hand that He cannot gather in. Radak says the alternation is deliberate - the prophet was given nechamah after purenut so that they should not say avdah tikvateinu, our hope is lost. Verse 16 returns to the judgment, and its images are drawn with a precision the commentators all notice. Vโ€™shalachti lโ€™dayagim rabim unediggum, I am sending for many fishers and they shall fish them; vโ€™acharei chen eshlach lโ€™rabim tzayadim vโ€™tzadum meโ€™al kol har umeโ€™al kol givโ€™ah umineikikei haselaโ€™im. Rashi unpacks the two-stage figure: as the fisherman takes the fish out of the place where it grew, so will these seize them inside the city, and as it is the nature of a fish that once caught it dies, so will I bring killers upon them - and afterward I will send hunters for the survivors and for those fleeing the sword into the mountains and hills, and they will hunt them to carry them into captivity. Radak states the distinction as a rule: the fish is the figure for those who die by the sword, because fish die in the catching when they are lifted from the water, and the hunted beast is the figure for the exiles, because a hunter takes his quarry alive. The fishers come first and the hunters after, which is not decoration but sequence - slaughter in the city, then a sweep of the hill country for whoever ran. Metzudat David adds the net that gathers all of them together in one haul, and reads nekikei haselaim as those who fled into the clefts of the rocks. There is nowhere that counts as outside. Verse 17 gives the reason and answers something the people had been saying: ki einai al kol darcheihem, lo nistru milfanai vโ€™lo nitzpan avonam mineged einai. Radakโ€™s comment is seven words and it reaches back to chapter 5 and forward to Yechezkelโ€™s ein Hashem roeh otanu: not as they say, that the Lord does not see us. Metzudat David notes the threefold repetition is for emphasis. The people who asked meh avoneinu in verse 10 had been assuming their iniquity was hidden; the answer is that the question was never a question about information. Verse 18 then pronounces the recompense - vโ€™shilamti rishonah mishneh avonam vโ€™chatatam al chalelam et artzi. Rashi reads mishneh as the doubling of the sin itself, because they repeated their iniquity by doing their fathersโ€™ iniquities, and notes that the Targum reads it as a double payment, al chad trein. Metzudat David takes rishonah as before the redemption - first I will pay, and then the days will come. Radakโ€™s comment here is the richest in the chapter: the land itself is the injured party. Artzi and nachalati mean the land fit for Me to rest My Presence in, and it is a pure land which they have defiled; he cites velo taki haโ€™aretz etchem betamachem otah, and argues that even the nations who were never commanded were vomited out, because God gave men sechel uvinah and reason alone suffices to recoil from serving wood and stone - all the more Israel, who were commanded. The phrase that does the work is bnivlat shikutzeihem, the carcasses of their abominations, which Radak connects to Vayikraโ€™s vโ€™hishlachti alecha shikutzim vโ€™nibaltich. They filled the land with corpses of idols; the land will be filled with their corpses, lโ€™domen al pnei haโ€™adamah, as verse 4 already said. The chapterโ€™s bookkeeping is exact.

And then the chapter ends somewhere nobody reading verse 4 could have predicted. Hashem uzi umaโ€™uzi umnusi bโ€™yom tzarah - the prophet speaks in his own voice, and Metzudat David hears in it the speech of a man who has nowhere else to run: when trouble comes I flee to You to escape, which is to say, then I will trust in You. Radak hears it more specifically as Yirmiyahu speaking against the very people he has been rebuking, who will not turn from their way - You are my strength against these who fight with me. And out of that loneliness comes the largest horizon in the book so far. Elecha goyim yavoโ€™u meโ€™afsei aretz - to You nations shall come from the ends of the earth - vโ€™amru ach sheker nachalu avoteinu, hevel vโ€™ein bam moil. The nations will say: our fathers inherited only falsehood, emptiness, and there is no profit in them. Rashi states it plainly: in the end the nations will return to You and serve You shechem echad, with one shoulder, and they will say, how did they make gods for themselves, and they are no gods. Radak sets it in yemot haMashiach and catches the precise word: nachalu, because they served idols dor achar dor, an inheritance handed from fathers to sons. That is the chapterโ€™s final and most devastating symmetry. Verse 11 had indicted Israel for exactly this - on account of your fathers who forsook Me, and you who have done worse - and verse 19 puts the identical structure into the mouths of the gentiles, who look at the same inheritance and renounce it: sheker nachalu avoteinu. The nations will say what Yehudah could not say. Verse 20 is the confession compressed: hayaaseh lo adam elohim vโ€™hemah lo elohim - Metzudat Davidโ€™s reading is almost mathematical, is it fitting that a man should make himself gods with the work of his own hands, when men themselves are not gods, and how should the work of their hands be better than they are - and Radak imagines the nations arriving and marveling eich haytah olah al daatam zot haโ€™emunah, how did this belief ever enter our minds. Against the question of verse 10, the nations ask the right question at last. And the chapter closes with the answer to every question it has raised, which is not an argument but an act: lachen hinโ€™ni modiam bapaam hazot, odiem et yadi vโ€™et gevurati vโ€™yadโ€™u ki shmi Hashem. Radak reads this back as addressed to those who will not turn - this time I will make them know My hand - and Rashi glosses shmi Hashem kemashmao, according to its plain sense, moshel vโ€™shalit, ruler and sovereign, to fulfil My decree. Metzudat David adds that then they will no longer be nevuchim badavar, confused in the matter, as they were formerly. So the chapter that opened by taking a wife and children away from one man closes with the whole earth coming to know the Name, and the two ends are a single argument. Yirmiyahu is emptied out so that his life can say what his words cannot: that the ordinary consolations are not guaranteed, that chesed can be gathered in, and that the God who withdraws them is the same God holding an oath He will not break. The prophet is the sign, and the sign is made of absence.


ืคืจืง ื˜ืดื– ยท Chapter 16

ืคืกื•ืง ืืณ ยท Verse 1

Hebrew:

ื•ึทื™ึฐื”ึดึฅื™ ื“ึฐื‘ึทืจึพื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ–ื” ืึตืœึทึฅื™ ืœึตืืžึนึฝืจืƒ

English:

The word of GOD came to me:

The bare prophetic formula opens what is the most unusual chapter in the book, and Radak's comment here is a single phrase, reserving his discussion for the command itself in the next verse. The word that follows will not be something Yirmiyahu is told to say but three things he is told not to do. What is about to be asked of him is unique in Tanakh: a prophet made into a sign not by an action added to his life but by what is taken out of it.

ืคืกื•ืง ื‘ืณ ยท Verse 2

Hebrew:

ืœึนืึพืชึดืงึผึทึฅื— ืœึฐืšึธึ– ืึดืฉืึผึธึ‘ื” ื•ึฐืœึนึฝืึพื™ึดื”ึฐื™ึคื•ึผ ืœึฐืšึธึ™ ื‘ึผึธื ึดึฃื™ื ื•ึผื‘ึธื ึ”ื•ึนืช ื‘ึผึทืžึผึธืงึ–ื•ึนื ื”ึทื–ึผึถึฝื”ืƒย {ืก} ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย 

English:

You are not to marry and not to have sons and daughters in this place.

Lo tikach lecha ishah v'lo yihyu lecha banim uvanot bamakom hazeh - do not take a wife, and do not have sons and daughters in this place. Metzudat David reads the second clause as the purpose of the first, so that the point of the celibacy is precisely that there be no children. Radak opens with the word mevuchah, perplexity, and mounts a long series of objections: why forbid a prophet children at all, when surely they would have lived on his merit, and young children die only for their fathers' sin, and Yirmiyahu had no such sin, and in any case the decree was not total, since Yechezkel foresees a remnant with banim uvanot. His resolution is to limit bamakom hazeh to Anatot, of which chapter 11 had said ush'erit lo tihyeh lahem - a righteous man inside a condemned city is not exempt, as Lot was warned pen tisafeh ba'avon ha'ir. The struggle itself is the point: the commentators treat celibacy as an anomaly needing justification, not as natural prophetic asceticism, because a prophet is not ordinarily released from peru urvu.

ืคืกื•ืง ื’ืณ ยท Verse 3

Hebrew:

ื›ึผึดื™ึพื›ึนึฃื”โ€‰ื€ ืึธืžึทึฃืจ ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ—ื” ืขึทืœึพื”ึทื‘ึผึธื ึดื™ืึ™ ื•ึฐืขึทืœึพื”ึทื‘ึผึธื ึ”ื•ึนืช ื”ึทื™ึผึดืœึผื•ึนื“ึดึ–ื™ื ื‘ึผึทืžึผึธืงึฃื•ึนื ื”ึทื–ึผึถึ‘ื” ื•ึฐืขึทึฝืœึพืึดืžึผึนืชึธึžื ื”ึทื™ึผึนืœึฐื“ึฃื•ึนืช ืื•ึนืชึธึ—ื ื•ึฐืขึทืœึพืึฒื‘ื•ึนืชึธึ›ื ื”ึทืžึผื•ึนืœึดื“ึดึฅื™ื ืื•ึนืชึธึ–ื ื‘ึผึธืึธึฅืจึถืฅ ื”ึทื–ึผึนึฝืืชืƒ

English:

For thus said GOD concerning any sons and daughters that may be born in this place, and concerning the mothers who bear them, and concerning the fathers who beget them in this land:

The decree is formally stated as covering three generations at once - the sons and daughters born in this place, the mothers who bear them, and the fathers who beget them. Metzudat David glosses hamolidim as those who cause the mothers to conceive, and Radak notes only that hailodim is an adjectival form, as in hailodim bamidbar. The grammar is worth noticing: the verse does not say the children will be killed but speaks of them as hailodim bamakom hazeh, those born in this place, so that the sentence attaches to the place and to the act of bringing life into it. That is what makes verse 2 a mercy and not only a sign.

ืคืกื•ืง ื“ืณ ยท Verse 4

Hebrew:

ืžึฐืžื•ึนืชึตึจื™ ืชึทื—ึฒืœึปืึดึœื™ื ื™ึธืžึปึ—ืชื•ึผ ืœึนึคื ื™ึดืกึผึธึฝืคึฐื“ื•ึผึ™ ื•ึฐืœึนึฃื ื™ึดืงึผึธื‘ึตึ”ืจื•ึผ ืœึฐื“ึนึ›ืžึถืŸ ืขึทืœึพืคึผึฐื ึตึฅื™ ื”ึธืึฒื“ึธืžึธึ–ื” ื™ึดื”ึฐื™ึ‘ื•ึผ ื•ึผื‘ึทื—ึถึคืจึถื‘ ื•ึผื‘ึธึฝืจึธืขึธื‘ึ™ ื™ึดื›ึฐืœึ”ื•ึผ ื•ึฐื”ึธื™ึฐืชึธึคื” ื ึดื‘ึฐืœึธืชึธืึ™ ืœึฐืžึทืึฒื›ึธึ”ืœ ืœึฐืขึฅื•ึนืฃ ื”ึทืฉืึผึธืžึทึ–ื™ึดื ื•ึผืœึฐื‘ึถื”ึฑืžึทึฅืช ื”ึธืึธึฝืจึถืฅืƒย {ืก} ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย 

English:

They shall die gruesome deaths. They shall not be lamented or buried; they shall be like dung on the surface of the ground. They shall be consumed by the sword and by famine, and their corpses shall be food for the birds of the sky and the beasts of the earth.

Memotei tachaluim yamutu - they shall die the deaths of sicknesses, unlamented and unburied, l'domen al pnei ha'adamah, as dung upon the face of the earth. Both Metzudat David and Radak identify the tachaluim by cross-reference to chapter 14, tachalu'ei raav, the wasting sicknesses of famine rather than plague as an independent visitation. Metzudat David explains the mechanics with dreadful practicality: no eulogy because everyone will be too consumed by his own disaster, no burial because the dead will be too many and there will not be time, so they will lie flung on the ground like manure - and being unburied is what makes them food for the birds and beasts. Radak says the same in a few words, that each man will be too occupied with himself. The word domen is pointed: dung is not only refuse but fertilizer spread on a field, and verse 18 will say that this people filled the land with the carcasses of their abominations.

ืคืกื•ืง ื”ืณ ยท Verse 5

Hebrew:

ื›ึผึดื™ึพื›ึนึฃื”โ€‰ื€ ืึธืžึทึฃืจ ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ—ื” ืึทืœึพืชึผึธื‘ื•ึนืึ™ ื‘ึผึตึฃื™ืช ืžึทืจึฐื–ึตึ”ื—ึท ื•ึฐืึทืœึพืชึผึตืœึตึฃืšึฐ ืœึดืกึฐืคึผึ”ื•ึนื“ ื•ึฐืึทืœึพืชึผึธื ึนึ–ื“ ืœึธื”ึถึ‘ื ื›ึผึดึฝื™ึพืึธืกึทึจืคึฐืชึผึดื™ ืึถืชึพืฉืึฐืœื•ึนืžึดึœื™ ืžึตืึตึจืช ื”ึธืขึธึคื ื”ึทื–ึผึถื”ึ™ ื ึฐืึปืึพื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ”ื” ืึถืชึพื”ึทื—ึถึ–ืกึถื“ ื•ึฐืึถืชึพื”ึธืจึทื—ึฒืžึดึฝื™ืืƒ

English:

For thus said GOD: Do not enter a house of mourning, Do not go to lament and to condole with them; For I have withdrawn My favor from that people โ€”declares GODโ€” My kindness and compassion.

The second prohibition: al tavo beit marzeach, do not enter the house of marzeach, do not go to lament or to condole. Radak reports that Chazal read marzeach as a house of mourning, citing vesar marzach seruchim from Amos, while his father took the root as the raising of the voice, whether in weeping or in rejoicing, noting the same sense in Arabic; Rashi, strikingly, reads it as a feast, citing the Sifrei on Baal Peor, before recording that our Rabbis explained it as mourning. The reason given is the theological core of the whole chapter - ki asafti et shlomi me'et ha'am hazeh, et hachesed v'et harachamim - and Rashi's gloss on asafti is among his finest: when Avraham did tzedakah and mishpat I gave his children chesed and rachamim, they turned mishpat to wormwood and cast tzedakah to the ground, and so I too have gathered My chesed and rachamim back to Myself, the same verb as asaf Elokim et cherpati. Radak draws the practical inference exactly: since I have gathered in My own shalom from them, you are not to inquire after their shalom either, not in their mourning and not in their rejoicing.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื‘ื™ืช ืžืจื–ื—. ืžืฉืชื” ื‘ืกืคืจื™ ื‘ืคืจืฉืช ื‘ื™ืช ืคืขื•ืจ ืจืื™ืชื™ ื—ื–ืจื• ืœืขืฉื•ืช ืœื”ื ืžืจื–ื™ื—ื™ืŸ ืื‘ืœ ืจื‘ื•ืชื™ื ื• ืคื™ืจืฉื• ืžืจื–ื— ืื‘ืœ: ืชื ื•ื“. ืชืงื•ื ืŸ: ื›ื™ ืืกืคืชื™ ืืช ืฉืœื•ืžื™ ื•ื’ื•'. ื›ืฉื”ื™ื” ืื‘ืจื”ื ืื‘ื™ื”ื ืขื•ืฉื” ืฆื“ืงื” ื•ืžืฉืคื˜ ื ืชืชื™ ืœื–ืจืขื• ื—ืกื“ ื•ืจื—ืžื™ื ื•ืฉืžืจ ื”' ืืœื”ื™ืš ืœืš ื•ื’ื•' (ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ื–ืณ:ื™ืดื‘) ื•ื ืชืŸ ืœืš ืจื—ืžื™ื (ืฉื ื™ื’) ื”ื ื”ืคื›ื• ืœืœืขื ื” ืžืฉืคื˜ ื•ืฆื“ืงื” ืœืืจืฅ ื”ื ื™ื—ื• (ืขืžื•ืก ื”ืณ:ื–ืณ) ืืฃ ืื ื™ ื—ื–ืจืชื™ ื•ืืกืคืชื™ ืืœื™ ืืช ื—ืกื“ื™ ื•ืืช ืจื—ืžื™: ืืกืคืชื™. ืื˜ื•ืื™"ืฉ ื‘ืœืขื– ื›ืžื• ืืกืฃ ืืœื”ื™ื ืืช ื—ืจืคืชื™ (ื‘ืจืืฉื™ืช ืœืณ:ื›ืดื’):
house of mourning feasting. In Sifrei, in the section dealing with Beth-peor (Balak), I saw. They returned to make feasts (ืžึทืจึฐื–ึตื™ื—ึดื™ืŸ) for them, but our Rabbis explained ืžึทืจึฐื–ึตื—ึท as 'a mourner.' you bemoan you shall lament. for I have gathered in My peace, etc. When their father Abraham performed charity and justice, I gave his children loving-kindness and mercy, as in Deut. 7:12: "And the Lord your God shall keep for you the covenant and the loving-kindness, etc." Also (Deut. 13:18), "And He shall give you mercy." They turned "justice into wormwood, and cast righteousness to the ground" (Amos 5:7). I, too, have returned and gathered in to Me My loving-kindness and My mercies. I have gathered in (ote in O.F.), taken off. Comp. (Gen. 30:23) "God has gathered (ืืกืฃ) in my disgrace."

ืคืกื•ืง ื•ืณ ยท Verse 6

Hebrew:

ื•ึผืžึตึจืชื•ึผ ื’ึฐื“ึนืœึดึงื™ื ื•ึผืงึฐื˜ึทื ึผึดึ›ื™ื ื‘ึผึธืึธึฅืจึถืฅ ื”ึทื–ึผึนึ–ืืช ืœึนึฃื ื™ึดืงึผึธื‘ึตึ‘ืจื•ึผ ื•ึฐืœึนืึพื™ึดืกึฐืคึผึฐื“ึฃื•ึผ ืœึธื”ึถึ”ื ื•ึฐืœึนึฃื ื™ึดืชึฐื’ึผึนื“ึทึ”ื“ ื•ึฐืœึนึฅื ื™ึดืงึผึธืจึตึ–ื—ึท ืœึธื”ึถึฝืืƒ

English:

Great and small alike shall die in this land, They shall not be buried; no one shall lament them, Nor gash and tonsure themselves for them.

Great and small shall die in this land unburied, unmourned, with none gashing himself or made bald for them. Rashi puts the logic of the prohibition bluntly - since everyone is dying, what is there for you to lament? - and both Rashi and Radak are careful to note that gashing and tonsure are forbidden to Israel in any case, lo titgodedu, lo tasimu korchah, and are named here only as the recognizable outward shape of grief. Radak suggests the people may in fact have taken up these practices after the customs of the nations, as they had taken up other sins that way, and Metzudat David adds that in the event they will be too overwhelmed by their own trouble to attend to their dead at all. The verse describes not cruelty but collapse: mourning requires survivors with time.
โ–ถCommentaries (2)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื•ืžืชื• ื’ื“ื•ืœื™ื ื•ืงื˜ื ื™ื. ื•ืื—ืจ ืฉื”ื›ืœ ืžืชื™ื ืžื” ืœืš ืœืกืคื•ื“: ื•ืœื ื™ืชื’ื•ื“ื“ ื•ืœื ื™ืงืจื— ืœื”ื. ื“ืจืš ื”ืื‘ืœื™ื ืœื”ืชื’ื•ื“ื“ ื•ืœืฉืจื•ื˜ ื‘ืฉืจื ื•ืœืงืจื•ื— ืงืจื—ื” ื‘ืจืืฉื ื•ืžื›ืœ ืžืงื•ื ืœื™ืฉืจืืœ ืืกื•ืจ ื•ืœื ื”ื–ื›ื™ืจื• ื›ืืŸ ืืœื ืœื“ื•ื’ืžืช ืื‘ืœ:
And large and small shall die And since everyone will die, why should you lament? and they shall not cut their flesh nor shall they tear their hair for them It is the custom of mourners to cut and tear their flesh and to tear their hair our of their head. In any case, it is forbidden for Jews, but he mentions it here only as an example of mourning.
ืจื“ืดืงRadak
ื•ืžืชื•. ื•ืœื ื™ืชื’ื•ื“ื“ ื•ืœื ื™ืงืจื— ืœื”ื, ื•ืืข"ืค ืฉื”ื•ื ืืกื•ืจ ืœื™ืฉืจืืœ ืœืขืฉื•ืชื• ื›ืžื• ืฉื›ืชื•ื‘ ืœื ืชืชื’ื•ื“ื“ื• ืœื ืชืฉื™ืžื• ืงืจื—ื” ื‘ื™ืŸ ืขื™ื ื™ื›ื ืœืžืช ืื•ืœื™ ื”ื ื”ื™ื• ืขื•ืฉื™ืŸ ื›ืžื ื”ื’ื™ ื”ื’ื•ื™ื ื›ืžื• ืฉื”ื™ื• ืขื•ืฉื™ื ืขื‘ื™ืจื•ืช ืื—ืจื•ืช ื›ืžื ื”ื’ ื”ื’ื•ื™ื ื•ืืžืจ ื›ื™ ืœื ื™ื”ื™ื” ืœื”ื ืคื ืื™ ืœืขืฉื•ืช ื”ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืฉืขื•ืฉื™ื ืขืœ ืžืช ืœื ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืื‘ืœ ื•ืœื ื“ื‘ืจื™ ื ื—ืžื”:
One will not cut himself nor make a bald spot. And even though it is forbidden to Israel to do it - as it is written, "you shall not cut yourselves, nor make any baldness between your eyes for the dead" - perhaps they did like the customs of the nations, just like they did other sins like the customs of the nations. And it states that they will not have the free time to do the things that they do for the dead - not the things of mourning and not the things of consolation.

ืคืกื•ืง ื–ืณ ยท Verse 7

Hebrew:

ื•ึฐืœึนืึพื™ึดืคึฐืจึฐืกึฅื•ึผ ืœึธื”ึถึ›ื ืขึทืœึพืึตึ–ื‘ึถืœ ืœึฐื ึทื—ึฒืžึฃื•ึน ืขึทืœึพืžึตึ‘ืช ื•ึฐืœึนึฝืึพื™ึทืฉืึฐืงึคื•ึผ ืื•ึนืชึธืึ™ ื›ึผึฃื•ึนืก ืชึผึทื ึฐื—ื•ึผืžึดึ”ื™ื ืขึทืœึพืึธื‘ึดึ–ื™ื• ื•ึฐืขึทืœึพืึดืžึผึฝื•ึนืƒ

English:

They shall not break bread for a mourner To offer comfort for a death, Nor offer one a cup of consolation For the loss of their father or mother.

The inventory of consolation continues and the loss becomes social rather than ceremonial: no breaking of bread for the mourner, no cup of consolation for a man mourning his father or his mother. Rashi reads yifresu as an expression of breaking, comparing ufarsin in Daniel, and identifies the practice as the meal given to mourners in the city square with the blessing of hamotzi broken over it for them; Metzudat David adds the reason it must come from others, that a mourner does not eat of his own at the first meal. Radak's father read it the same way, while Radak himself first offers a different sense, the spreading of the hands in grief, and notes that the singular al aviv v'al imo in a plural verse means each man for his own father and mother. What is being withdrawn here is not ritual but the ordinary human traffic by which a community absorbs a death.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื•ืœื ื™ืคืจืกื•. ืœ' ืฉื‘ื™ืจื” ื›ืžื• (ื“ื ื™ืืœ ื”ืณ:ื›ืดื”) ืžื ื ืžื ื ืชืงืœ ื•ืคืจืกื™ืŸ ืฉืžื‘ืจื™ืŸ ืืช ื”ืื‘ืœื™ื ื‘ืจื—ื‘ื” ื•ืคื•ืจืกื™ืŸ ืœื”ื ื‘ืจื›ืช ื”ืžื•ืฆื™ื ื›ื™ ื”ื•ื ื™ื‘ืจืš ื”ื–ื‘ื— (ืฉืžื•ืืœ ื ื˜ืณ:ื™ืดื’) ืชื™ืจื’ื ื™ื•ื ืชืŸ ืืจื™ ื”ื•ื ืคืจื™ืก ืขืœ ืžื–ื•ื ื: ื•ืœื ื™ืฉืงื• ืื•ืชื ื•ื’ื•'. ื”ืจื™ ื˜ืขื ืœืžื” ืฉืืžืจืชื™ ืืœ ืชืœืš ืœืกืคื•ื“:
And they shall not break [bread] for them an expression of breaking. Comp. (Dan. 5:25) "Mene Mene Tekel Upharsin, (divided)." This alludes to the practice of giving a meal to the mourners in the city square and they break for them the bread upon reciting the blessing of 'hamotzi.' (I Sam. 9: 13) "For he will bless the sacrifices," Jonathan renders: He will break (ืคึธืจึดื™ืก) bread. neither will they give them to drink etc This is the reason for what I said, "Neither go to lament."

ืคืกื•ืง ื—ืณ ยท Verse 8

Hebrew:

ื•ึผื‘ึตื™ืชึพืžึดืฉืึฐืชึผึถึฅื” ืœึนึฝืึพืชึธื‘ึ–ื•ึนื ืœึธืฉืึถึฃื‘ึถืช ืื•ึนืชึธึ‘ื ืœึถืึฑื›ึนึ–ืœ ื•ึฐืœึดืฉืึฐืชึผึฝื•ึนืชืƒย {ืค}

English:

Nor shall you enter a house of feasting, To sit down with them to eat and drink.

The third prohibition closes the last door: uveit mishteh lo tavo lashevet otam le'echol v'lishtot. Metzudat David specifies a wedding feast and states the purpose openly - l'maan heyot lahem l'mofet v'ot, so that you shall be to them a portent and a sign. Rashi supplies the connective that holds the chapter together, noting that the reason for this prohibition is the verse immediately following, hin'ni mashbit, while Radak remarks simply that these verses are plain until lachen hinei yamim ba'im. With mourning and feasting both forbidden, Yirmiyahu has been barred from the two gatherings through which a person is woven into the life of his town; the subtraction is now complete.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื•ื‘ื™ืช ืžืฉืชื”. ืืฉืจ ืืžืจืชื™ ืœืš ืœืžืขืœื” ืœื ืชื‘ื ื–ื” ื”ื˜ืขื ื”ื ื ื™ ืžืฉื‘ื™ืช ืžืŸ ื”ืžืงื•ื ื”ื–ื” ื•ื’ื•':
And to a house of feasting that I said to you above, "You shall not go," this is the reason: Behold, I will cut off from this place, etc.

ืคืกื•ืง ื˜ืณ ยท Verse 9

Hebrew:

ื›ึผึดื™ึฉ ื›ึนึจื” ืึธืžึทึœืจ ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึคื” ืฆึฐื‘ึธืื•ึนืชึ™ ืึฑืœึนื”ึตึฃื™ ื™ึดืฉื‚ึฐืจึธืึตึ”ืœ ื”ึดื ึฐื ึดึจื™ ืžึทืฉืึฐื‘ึผึดึœื™ืช ืžึดืŸึพื”ึทืžึผึธืงึฅื•ึนื ื”ึทื–ึผึถึ›ื” ืœึฐืขึตื™ื ึตื™ื›ึถึ–ื ื•ึผื‘ึดื™ืžึตื™ื›ึถึ‘ื ืงึคื•ึนืœ ืฉื‚ึธืฉื‚ื•ึนืŸึ™ ื•ึฐืงึฃื•ึนืœ ืฉื‚ึดืžึฐื—ึธึ”ื” ืงึฅื•ึนืœ ื—ึธืชึธึ–ืŸ ื•ึฐืงึฅื•ึนืœ ื›ึผึทืœึผึธึฝื”ืƒ

English:

For thus said GOD of Hosts, the God of Israel: I am going to banish from this place, in your days and before your eyes, the sound of mirth and gladness, the voice of bridegroom and bride.

Hin'ni mashbit min hamakom hazeh l'eineichem uvimeichem kol sason v'kol simchah kol chatan v'kol kallah - I am causing to cease from this place the voice of mirth and gladness, the voice of the bridegroom and the voice of the bride. Metzudat David reads mashbit as I will annul and withhold, and takes l'eineichem uvimeichem as emphatic doubling: this will not be deferred to a later generation but will happen in your own days and before your own eyes. These same seven sounds close chapter 7, and the tradition has done something extraordinary with them - the last of the sheva berachot under every chuppah is built from this verse inverted, the voices restored to the cities of Yehudah and the streets of Yerushalayim, a reversal Yirmiyahu will himself prophesy in chapter 33.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืณ ยท Verse 10

Hebrew:

ื•ึฐื”ึธื™ึธึ—ื” ื›ึผึดึคื™ ืชึทื’ึผึดื™ื“ึ™ ืœึธืขึธึฃื ื”ึทื–ึผึถึ”ื” ืึตึฅืช ื›ึผื‡ืœึพื”ึทื“ึผึฐื‘ึธืจึดึ–ื™ื ื”ึธืึตึ‘ืœึผึถื” ื•ึฐืึธืžึฐืจึฃื•ึผ ืึตืœึถึ—ื™ืšึธ ืขึทืœึพืžึถื”ึฉ ื“ึดื‘ึผึถึจืจ ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึคื” ืขึธืœึตึ™ื™ื ื•ึผึ™ ืึตึฃืช ื›ึผื‡ืœึพื”ึธืจึธืขึธึคื” ื”ึทื’ึผึฐื“ื•ึนืœึธื”ึ™ ื”ึทื–ึผึนึ”ืืช ื•ึผืžึถึคื” ืขึฒื•ึบื ึตึ™ื ื•ึผึ™ ื•ึผืžึถึฃื” ื—ึทื˜ึผึธืืชึตึ”ื ื•ึผ ืึฒืฉืึถึฅืจ ื—ึธื˜ึธึ–ืื ื•ึผ ืœึทื™ื”ึนื•ึธึฅื” ืึฑืœึนื”ึตึฝื™ื ื•ึผืƒ

English:

And when you announce all these things to that people, and they ask you, โ€œWhy has GOD decreed upon us all this fearful evil? What is the iniquity and what the sin that we have committed against the ETERNAL our God?โ€

This is the hinge of the chapter: when you tell them all this they will ask al meh diber Hashem aleinu et kol hara'ah hagedolah hazot, umeh avoneinu umeh chatateinu. Metzudat David renders al meh simply as on account of what, and Radak confines himself to grammatical notes on the segol of meh and the singular forms avonenu and chatatenu. What is striking is the tone: this is not the sneering defiance of chapter 17 but a sincere request for the charge sheet, from people who say laHashem Eloheinu with complete assurance. Chapter 11 had counted the gods by towns and the altars by streets, and a sin distributed that evenly becomes invisible to those living inside it.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื ยท Verse 11

Hebrew:

ื•ึฐืึธืžึทืจึฐืชึผึธึฃ ืึฒืœึตื™ื”ึถึ—ื ืขึทืœึฉ ืึฒืฉืึถืจึพืขึธื–ึฐื‘ึจื•ึผ ืึฒื‘ื•ึนืชึตื™ื›ึถึคื ืื•ึนืชึดื™ึ™ ื ึฐืึปืึพื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ”ื” ื•ึทื™ึผึตืœึฐื›ึ—ื•ึผ ืึทึฝื—ึฒืจึตื™ึ™ ืึฑืœึนื”ึดึฃื™ื ืึฒื—ึตืจึดึ”ื™ื ื•ึทื™ึผึทืขึทื‘ึฐื“ึ–ื•ึผื ื•ึทื™ึผึดืฉืึฐืชึผึทื—ึฒื•ึฃื•ึผ ืœึธื”ึถึ‘ื ื•ึฐืึนืชึดึฃื™ ืขึธื–ึธึ”ื‘ื•ึผ ื•ึฐืึถืชึพืชึผื•ึนืจึธืชึดึ–ื™ ืœึนึฅื ืฉืึธืžึธึฝืจื•ึผืƒ

English:

say to them, โ€œBecause your ancestors deserted Meโ€”declares GODโ€”and followed other gods and served them and worshiped them; they deserted Me and did not keep My Instruction.

The answer is not a fresh indictment but a genealogy: because your fathers forsook Me and went after other gods and served them and bowed to them, v'oti azavu v'et torati lo shamaru. Metzudat David reads those last words as a single movement - they did not believe in Me in their hearts, and therefore did not keep My Torah - making unbelief the root and non-observance the symptom rather than two separate charges. The reply to meh avoneinu thus begins by pointing somewhere the questioners were not looking, at an inheritance rather than an act.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื‘ ยท Verse 12

Hebrew:

ื•ึฐืึทืชึผึถึ›ื ื”ึฒืจึตืขึนืชึถึฅื ืœึทืขึฒืฉื‚ึ–ื•ึนืช ืžึตืึฒื‘ึฝื•ึนืชึตื™ื›ึถึ‘ื ื•ึฐื”ึดื ึผึฐื›ึถึฃื ื”ึนืœึฐื›ึดึ—ื™ื ืึดึšื™ืฉื ืึทึฝื—ึฒืจึตื™ึ™ ืฉืึฐืจึดืจึฃื•ึผืช ืœึดื‘ึผึฝื•ึนึพื”ึธืจึธึ”ืข ืœึฐื‘ึดืœึฐืชึผึดึ–ื™ ืฉืึฐืžึนึฅืขึท ืึตืœึธึฝื™ืƒ

English:

And you have acted worse than your ancestors, every one of you following the willfulness of their own evil heart and paying no heed to Me.

And then the trap closes: v'atem hare'otem la'asot me'avoteichem, you have done worse than your fathers, each walking after the stubbornness of his own evil heart. Metzudat David glosses hare'otem as you did evil still more than your fathers did, and on lebilti shmoa elai he makes the sharpest observation in the chapter - the whole substance of the desire is not to listen to Me, so that the appetite is not for the idol but for the absence of the commanding voice. Radak supplies the juridical frame that keeps the generational argument just: pokeid avon avot al banim applies only kesheochazin maaseh avoteihem biyedeihem, when the sons are holding their fathers' deeds in their own hands. You asked what your sin is; your sin is that you are the next instalment of theirs, and a worse one.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื’ ยท Verse 13

Hebrew:

ื•ึฐื”ึตื˜ึทืœึฐืชึผึดึฃื™ ืึถืชึฐื›ึถึ—ื ืžึตืขึทืœึ™ ื”ึธืึธึฃืจึถืฅ ื”ึทื–ึผึนึ”ืืช ืขึทืœึพื”ึธืึธึ•ืจึถืฅ ืึฒืฉืึถืจึ™ ืœึนึฃื ื™ึฐื“ึทืขึฐืชึผึถึ”ื ืึทืชึผึถึ–ื ื•ึทืึฒื‘ื•ึนืชึตื™ื›ึถึ‘ื ื•ึทืขึฒื‘ึทื“ึฐืชึผึถืึพืฉืึธึžื ืึถืชึพืึฑืœึนื”ึดึคื™ื ืึฒื—ึตืจึดื™ืึ™ ื™ื•ึนืžึธึฃื ื•ึธืœึทึ”ื™ึฐืœึธื” ืึฒืฉืึถึ›ืจ ืœึนืึพืึถืชึผึตึฅืŸ ืœึธื›ึถึ–ื ื—ึฒื ึดื™ื ึธึฝื”ืƒย {ืค}

English:

Therefore I will hurl you out of this land to a land that neither you nor your ancestors have known, and there you will serve other gods, day and night; for I will show you no mercy.โ€

V'hetalti etchem - Radak glosses hetalti as hishlachti, I will hurl - off this land onto a land neither you nor your fathers have known, va'avadtem sham et elohim acherim yomam valaylah. Rashi and Radak both follow the Targum in reading the clause as serving there the nations who worship idols, day and night, rather than idolatry freely chosen. Metzudat David draws out the measure-for-measure in the final word: because I will not give you chen in the eyes of the nations, you will serve them day and night and find no rest, and Radak reads chaninah as rachamim, meaning the enemies will show you no mercy but work you harshly. Men who wanted gods they could make will be given masters they cannot put down.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื•ืขื‘ื“ืชื ืฉื ืืช ืืœื”ื™ื ืื—ืจื™ื. ืชืจื’ื ื™ื•ื ืชืŸ ื•ืชืคืœื—ื•ืŸ ืชืžืŸ ืœืขืžืžื™ื ืคืœื—ื™ ื˜ืขื•ื•ืชื:
and you will serve there other gods Jonathan paraphrases: And you will serve there nations that worship idols day and night.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื“ ยท Verse 14

Hebrew:

ืœึธื›ึตึ›ืŸ ื”ึดื ึผึตื”ึพื™ึธืžึดึฅื™ื ื‘ึผึธืึดึ–ื™ื ื ึฐืึปืึพื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ‘ื” ื•ึฐืœึนืึพื™ึตืึธืžึตึฅืจ ืขื•ึนื“ึ™ ื—ึทื™ึพื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ”ื” ืึฒืฉืึถึงืจ ื”ึถืขึฑืœึธึ›ื” ืึถืชึพื‘ึผึฐื ึตึฅื™ ื™ึดืฉื‚ึฐืจึธืึตึ–ืœ ืžึตืึถึฅืจึถืฅ ืžึดืฆึฐืจึธึฝื™ึดืืƒ

English:

Assuredly, a time is comingโ€”declares GODโ€”when it shall no more be said, โ€œAs GOD lives who brought the Israelites out of the land of Egypt,โ€

With no transition at all the chapter turns: lachen hinei yamim ba'im, and the oath by which Israel swears will change - v'lo yei'amer od chai Hashem asher he'elah et bnei Yisrael me'eretz Mitzrayim. Rashi's first word is the key, that lachen here is a language of oath: although you betrayed Me, I hold an oath in My hand that I will redeem you. He then cites the Gemara's reading, that the exodus is not uprooted from its place but that the final redemption becomes the principal thing and the exodus secondary to it. Metzudat David supplies the proportion - because the troubles will be so very many, the later deliverance will be weightier - and Radak notes that the prophet was given this consolation immediately after the punishment so that they should not say avdah tikvateinu, our hope is lost.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืœื›ืŸ. ืœืฉื•ืŸ ืฉื‘ื•ืขื” ืืฃ ืขืœ ืคื™ ืฉื‘ื’ื“ืชื ื‘ื™ ืฉื‘ื•ืขื” ื”ื™ื ื‘ื™ื“ื™ ืฉืื’ืื•ืœ ืืชื›ื: ื•ืœื ื™ืืžืจ ืขื•ื“ ื•ื’ื•'. ืจื‘ื•ืชื™ื ื• ื“ืจืฉื• (ื‘ืจื›ื•ืช ื™ื‘) ืœื ืฉืชืขืงืจ ื™ืฆื™ืืช ืžืฆืจื™ื ืžืžืงื•ืžื” ืืœื ื’ืื•ืœื” ืื—ืจื•ื ื” ืขื™ืงืจ ื•ื™ืฆื™ืืช ืžืฆืจื™ื ื˜ืคืœ ืœื”:
Therefore An expression of an oath. Although you betrayed Me, I have an oath that I will redeem you. and it shall no longer be said Our Rabbis expounded: Not that the departure from Egypt shall be uprooted from its place, but the final redemption will be the most important and the departure from Egypt secondary to it.

ืคืกื•ืง ื˜ืดื• ยท Verse 15

Hebrew:

ื›ึผึดึฃื™ ืึดืึพื—ึทื™ึพื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ—ื” ืึฒืฉืึถึจืจ ื”ึถืขึฑืœึธึœื” ืึถืชึพื‘ึผึฐื ึตึคื™ ื™ึดืฉื‚ึฐืจึธืึตืœึ™ ืžึตืึถึฃืจึถืฅ ืฆึธืคึ”ื•ึนืŸ ื•ึผืžึดื›ึผึนืœึ™ ื”ึธืึฒืจึธืฆึ”ื•ึนืช ืึฒืฉืึถึฅืจ ื”ึดื“ึผึดื™ื—ึธึ–ื ืฉืึธึ‘ืžึผึธื” ื•ึทื”ึฒืฉืึดึฝื‘ึนืชึดื™ืึ™ ืขึทืœึพืึทื“ึฐืžึธืชึธึ”ื ืึฒืฉืึถึฅืจ ื ึธืชึทึ–ืชึผึดื™ ืœึทืึฒื‘ื•ึนืชึธึฝืืƒย {ืค}

English:

but rather, โ€œAs GOD lives who brought the Israelites out of the northland, and out of all the lands to which they had been banished.โ€ For I will bring them back to their land, which I gave to their ancestors.

The new oath formula is stated: chai Hashem asher he'elah et bnei Yisrael me'eretz tzafon umikol ha'aratzot asher hidicham shamah. Metzudat David explains why the oath shifts - that redemption will be the more weighty one, and men will invoke it instead - and notes a small grammatical elegance, that vahashivotim is God speaking of Himself while the people swearing will naturally say v'heshiv otam. Radak reads hidicham as the work of the kings of the nations who exiled them, and reports the machloket among Chazal openly: some hold that the exodus will not be mentioned at all, others that it will be mentioned but that the subjugation under the kingdoms will be the principal thing and Egypt the appendix to it. Hold the claim steady, because it is one of the largest in the Nevi'im: the founding event of Israel's existence is to become the lesser story.

ืคืกื•ืง ื˜ืดื– ยท Verse 16

Hebrew:

ื”ึดื ึฐื ึดึจื™ ืฉืึนืœึตึœื—ึท (ืœื“ื•ื’ื™ื) [ืœึฐื“ึทื™ึผึธื’ึดึฅื™ื] ืจึทื‘ึผึดึ›ื™ื ื ึฐืึปืึพื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ–ื” ื•ึฐื“ึดื™ื’ึ‘ื•ึผื ื•ึฐืึทื—ึฒืจึตื™ึพื›ึตึ—ืŸ ืึถืฉืึฐืœึทื—ึ™ ืœึฐืจึทื‘ึผึดึฃื™ื ืฆึทื™ึผึธื“ึดึ”ื™ื ื•ึฐืฆึธื“ึžื•ึผื ืžึตืขึทึคืœ ื›ึผื‡ืœึพื”ึทืจึ™ ื•ึผืžึตืขึทึฃืœ ื›ึผื‡ืœึพื’ึผึดื‘ึฐืขึธึ”ื” ื•ึผืžึดื ึผึฐืงึดื™ืงึตึ–ื™ ื”ึทืกึผึฐืœึธืขึดึฝื™ืืƒ

English:

Lo, I am sending for many fishermen โ€”declares GODโ€” And they shall haul them out; And after that I will send for many hunters, And they shall hunt them Out of every mountain and out of every hill And out of the clefts of the rocks.

V'shalachti l'dayagim rabim unediggum, and afterward hunters who will hunt them from every mountain and hill and out of the clefts of the rocks. Rashi unpacks the two-stage figure: as the fisherman takes the fish from the place where it grew, so will these seize them inside the city, and as a fish dies in the catching, so will I bring killers upon them - and only afterward hunters, for the survivors who fled the sword into the hills, to hunt them into captivity. Radak states the same distinction as a rule, the fish standing for those who die by the sword and the hunted beast for the exiles, since a hunter takes his quarry alive. Metzudat David adds the net that gathers all of them in one haul and reads nekikei haselaim as those who hid in the rock-clefts. The sequence is the argument: slaughter in the city, then a sweep of the hill country for whoever ran, and nowhere that counts as outside.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื•ื“ื™ื’ื•ื. ืžื” ื”ื“ื™ื™ื’ ืฉื•ืœื”ื• ืžืชื•ืš ืžืงื•ื ื’ื“ื•ืœื• ืืฃ ืืœื• ื™ืœื›ื“ื• ืื•ืชื ื‘ืชื•ืš ื”ืขื™ืจ ื•ืžื” ืขืกืงื• ืฉืœ ื“ื’ ืžืฉื ืœื›ื“ ื”ื•ื ืžืช ื›ืš ืื‘ื™ื ืขืœื™ื”ื ื”ื•ืจื’ื™ื ื•ืื—"ื› ืืฉืœื— ืฆื™ื“ื™ื ืœื ืฉืืจื™ื ื•ืœื‘ื•ืจื—ื™ื ืžืŸ ื”ื—ืจื‘ ืขืœ ื”ื”ืจื™ื ื•ื”ื’ื‘ืขื•ืช ื•ืฆื“ื•ื ืœื”ื’ืœื•ืชื ื‘ืฉื‘ื™:
and they will fish them Just as the fisher takes - it i.e., - the fish from its habitat, so will these capture them within the city, and just as the manner of a fish, that when he is caught he dies, so will I bring killers upon them, and afterwards I will send hunters for the survivors and for those who flee from the sword to the mountains and the hills, and they will hunt them to exile them in captivity.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื– ยท Verse 17

Hebrew:

ื›ึผึดึคื™ ืขึตื™ื ึทื™ึ™ ืขึทืœึพื›ึผื‡ืœึพื“ึผึทืจึฐื›ึตื™ื”ึถึ”ื ืœึนึฅื ื ึดืกึฐืชึผึฐืจึ–ื•ึผ ืžึดืœึผึฐืคึธื ึธึ‘ื™ ื•ึฐืœึนึฝืึพื ึดืฆึฐืคึผึทึฅืŸ ืขึฒื•ึบื ึธึ–ื ืžึดื ึผึถึฅื’ึถื“ ืขึตื™ื ึธึฝื™ืƒ

English:

For My eyes are on all their ways, They are not hidden from My presence, Their iniquity is not concealed from My sight.

Ki einai al kol darcheihem, lo nistru milfanai v'lo nitzpan avonam mineged einai. Radak's comment is only a handful of words and they carry the whole verse: this is not as they say, that the Lord does not see us. Metzudat David reads the triple statement as deliberate repetition for emphasis. Placed here the verse answers the question of verse 10 from a different angle - the people who asked what their iniquity was had been assuming it was hidden, and are told that the question was never about information.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื— ยท Verse 18

Hebrew:

ื•ึฐืฉืึดืœึผึทืžึฐืชึผึดึฃื™ ืจึดืืฉืื•ึนื ึธึ—ื” ืžึดืฉืึฐื ึตึคื” ืขึฒื•ึบื ึธืึ™ ื•ึฐื—ึทื˜ึผึธืืชึธึ”ื ืขึทึ–ืœ ื—ึทืœึผึฐืœึธึฃื ืึถืชึพืึทืจึฐืฆึดึ‘ื™ ื‘ึผึฐื ึดื‘ึฐืœึทึคืช ืฉืึดืงึผึฝื•ึผืฆึตื™ื”ึถืึ™ ื•ึฐืชื•ึนืขึฒื‘ึฃื•ึนืชึตื™ื”ึถึ”ื ืžึธืœึฐืึ–ื•ึผ ืึถืชึพื ึทื—ึฒืœึธืชึดึฝื™ืƒย {ืค}

English:

I will pay them in full โ€” Nay, doubly for their iniquity and their sinsโ€” Because they have defiled My land With the corpses of their abominations, And have filled My own possession With their abhorrent things.

V'shilamti rishonah mishneh avonam v'chatatam al chalelam et artzi. Rashi reads mishneh as the doubling of the sin itself, because they repeated their iniquity by taking up their fathers' iniquities, and notes that the Targum instead renders it as a double payment, al chad trein; Metzudat David takes rishonah as before the redemption, so that the recompense precedes the days that are coming. Radak's comment here is the richest in the chapter: the land itself is the injured party, artzi and nachalati meaning the land fit for Me to rest My Presence in, a pure land they have defiled, and he argues from velo taki ha'aretz etchem that even the nations who were never commanded were vomited out, since reason alone suffices to recoil from serving wood and stone. The phrase that does the work is bnivlat shikutzeihem, the carcasses of their abominations - they filled the land with the corpses of idols, and verse 4 has already said what will be spread on the land in return.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืžืฉื ื” ืขื•ื ื. ืืช ืฉืฉื ื• ืขืœ ืขื•ื ื ืœืขืฉื•ืช ืขื•ื ื•ืช ืื‘ื•ืชื™ื”ื ื•ื™ื•ื ืชืŸ ืชื™ืจื’ื ื›ืŸ ื•ืืฉืœื ืœืชื ื™ื™ื ื™ืŸ ื›ืงื“ืžืื™ืŸ ืขืœ ื—ื“ ืชืจื™ืŸ:
the doubling of their iniquity Because they repeated their iniquity to do the iniquities of their fathers. And Jonathan renders in this manner: And I will recompense the second ones like the first ones double.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื˜ ยท Verse 19

Hebrew:

ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึžื” ืขึปื–ึผึดึงื™ ื•ึผืžึธืขึปื–ึผึดึ›ื™ ื•ึผืžึฐื ื•ึผืกึดึ–ื™ ื‘ึผึฐื™ึฃื•ึนื ืฆึธืจึธึ‘ื” ืึตืœึถึ—ื™ืšึธ ื’ึผื•ึนื™ึดึคื ื™ึธื‘ึนึ™ืื•ึผึ™ ืžึตึฝืึทืคึฐืกึตื™ึพืึธึ”ืจึถืฅ ื•ึฐื™ึนืืžึฐืจึ—ื•ึผ ืึทืšึฐึพืฉืึถึ™ืงึถืจึ™ ื ึธื—ึฒืœึฃื•ึผ ืึฒื‘ื•ึนืชึตึ”ื™ื ื•ึผ ื”ึถึ–ื‘ึถืœ ื•ึฐืึตึฝื™ืŸึพื‘ึผึธึฅื ืžื•ึนืขึดึฝื™ืœืƒ

English:

O ETERNAL One, my strength and my stronghold, My refuge in a day of trouble, To You nations shall come From the ends of the earth and say: Our ancestors inherited utter delusions, Things that are futile and worthless.

Hashem uzi uma'uzi umnusi b'yom tzarah - the prophet speaks in his own voice, and Metzudat David hears a man with nowhere else to run: when trouble comes I flee to You to escape, which is to say, then I will trust in You. Radak hears it more pointedly as Yirmiyahu speaking against the very people he has been rebuking, who will not turn from their way. Out of that loneliness comes the widest horizon in the book so far: elecha goyim yavo'u me'afsei aretz, and they will say ach sheker nachalu avoteinu, hevel v'ein bam moil. Rashi states it plainly, that in the end the nations will return and serve Him shechem echad, with one shoulder; Radak sets it in yemot haMashiach and catches the precise word nachalu, since they served idols dor achar dor, an inheritance handed from fathers to sons. That is the chapter's most devastating symmetry - verse 11 indicted Israel for exactly this inheritance, and here the gentiles look at the same thing and renounce it.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื”' ืขื•ื–ื™ ื•ืžืขื•ื–ื™ ื•ืžื ื•ืกื™. ืื ื˜ื™ืคื•ื™ื™ืžืื "ื˜ ื‘ืœืขื– ื•ืžื ื—ื ื—ื‘ืจื• ืœ' ืคืœื ื›ืžื• ื ืชืช ืœื™ืจืื™ืš ื ืก ืœื”ืชื ื•ืกืก (ืชื”ื™ืœื™ื ืกืณ:ื•ืณ) ื•ื›ืŸ ื”' ื ืกื™ (ืฉืžื•ืช ื–) ื•ื“ื•ื ืฉ ืคืชืจ ืื•ืชื• ืœ' ืžื ื•ืก ืžืžืฉ: ืืœื™ืš ื’ื•ื™ื ื™ื‘ืื•. ืกื•ืฃ ื”ืื•ืžื•ืช ืœืฉื•ื‘ ืืœื™ืš ื•ืœืขื‘ื“ืš ืฉื›ื ืื—ื“ ื•ืขืžืš ืื™ืš ืขืฉื• ืœื”ื ืืœื”ื™ื ื•ื”ืžื” ืœื ืืœื”ื™ื: ืžืืคืกื™. ื›ืžื• ืžืงืฆื”: ื ื—ืœื•. ืœ' ื ื—ืœื”: ืžื•ืขื™ืœ. ืœ' ืชื•ืขืœืช:
and my refuge (mon vantement in French), my boast. And Menahem (Machbereth p. 123) classified it as an expression of a wonder. Cf. (Psalms 60:6) "You have given those who fear You a wonder to be wondrous (ื ึตืก ืœึฐื”ึดืชึฐื ื•ึนืกึตืก)." to You nations will come Eventually, the heathens will come to you and worship You of one accord, and they will say, "How did they make gods for themselves, and they are no gods?" from the ends of Like ืžึดืงึฐืฆึตื”, from the end of. handed down an expression of an inheritance. avail an expression of use (ืชึผื•ึนืขึถืœึถืช).

ืคืกื•ืง ื›ืณ ยท Verse 20

Hebrew:

ื”ึฒื™ึทืขึฒืฉื‚ึถื”ึพืœึผึฅื•ึน ืึธื“ึธึ–ื ืึฑืœึนื”ึดึ‘ื™ื ื•ึฐื”ึตึ–ืžึผึธื” ืœึนึฅื ืึฑืœึนื”ึดึฝื™ืืƒ

English:

Can mortals make gods for themselves? No-gods are they!

Hayaaseh lo adam elohim v'hemah lo elohim - shall a man make gods for himself, and they are no gods? Metzudat David's reading is almost mathematical: is it fitting that a man should make himself gods by the work of his own hands, when men themselves are not gods, and how should the work of their hands be better than the hands that made it? Radak adds that they will not act as gods act, answering those who call and rescuing them from trouble, and imagines the nations arriving, confessing their sin and marveling eich haytah olah al daatam zot ha'emunah, how did this belief ever enter our minds. Against the bewildered question of verse 10, the nations are the ones who finally ask the right one.

ืคืกื•ืง ื›ืดื ยท Verse 21

Hebrew:

ืœึธื›ึตืŸึ™ ื”ึดื ึฐื ึดึฃื™ ืžึฝื•ึนื“ึดื™ืขึธึ”ื ื‘ึผึทืคึผึทึฃืขึทื ื”ึทื–ึผึนึ”ืืช ืื•ึนื“ึดื™ืขึตึฅื ืึถืชึพื™ึธื“ึดึ–ื™ ื•ึฐืึถืชึพื’ึผึฐื‘ื•ึผืจึธืชึดึ‘ื™ ื•ึฐื™ึธื“ึฐืขึ–ื•ึผ ื›ึผึดึฝื™ึพืฉืึฐืžึดึฅื™ ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึฝื”ืƒย {ืก} ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย 

English:

Assuredly, I will teach them, Once and for all I will teach them My power and My might. And they shall learn that My name is GOD.

The chapter closes with an act rather than an argument: lachen hin'ni modiam bapaam hazot, odiem et yadi v'et gevurati v'yad'u ki shmi Hashem. Radak reads it as addressed back to those who will not turn - this time I will make them know My hand - while Rashi glosses shmi Hashem kemashmao, according to its plain sense, moshel v'shalit, ruler and sovereign, to fulfil My decree. Metzudat David adds that the Name indicates absolute capability, and that then they will no longer be nevuchim badavar, confused in the matter, as they had been. The chapter that began by taking a wife and children from one man ends with the whole earth knowing the Name, and the two ends are a single argument: the prophet is the sign, and the sign is made of absence.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื›ื™ ืฉืžื™ ื”'. ื›ืžืฉืžืขื• ืžื•ืฉืœ ื•ืฉืœื™ื˜ ืœืงื™ื™ื ื’ื–ืจืชื™:
that My name is the Lord As its apparent meaning, a ruler and a sovereign to fulfill My decree.

โ† Jeremiah 15 | Jeremiah 17 โ†’

Back to Jeremiah | Back to Nach Yomi