Skip to main contentSkip to Content

Jeremiah 15

ื™ืจืžื™ื”ื• ืคืจืง ื˜ืดื•

Section: ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ยท ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ืื—ืจื•ื ื™ื | Book: Jeremiah | Chapter: 15 of 52 | Day: 228 of 742

Date: September 27, 2026


ืงืœืื•ื“ ืขืœ ื”ื ืดืš

Chapter 15 is the answer to chapter 14, and the answer is no. Yirmiyahu had just finished one of the most elaborate intercessions in Nach - the drought liturgy, the confession mikveh Yisrael moshio bโ€™et tzarah, the plea lo titosh otanu, do not abandon us - and what comes back is the most crushing sentence God ever speaks to a prophet about his people: im yaamod Moshe uShmuel lefanai ein nafshi el haโ€™am hazeh, though Moshe and Shmuel stood before Me, My soul would not be toward this people. Radak frames the verse as a direct retort to the praying that has just ended - why do you multiply prayer before Me, when even those greater than you would not be heard - and explains the choice of these two names with precision: both were Levites, both were prophets, and Shmuel was the greatest of the neviโ€™im after Moshe, as Tehillim pairs them, Moshe vโ€™Aharon bโ€™chohanav uShmuel bโ€™korei shmo. Rashi goes further and finds in the pairing not a compliment but a method. Both men did beg mercy for Israel, he says, but neither imagined he could turn away the wrath before he had first turned the people around: Moshe said simu ish charbo and ground the calf into the water, and only then said eโ€™eleh el Hashem ulai achaprah; Shmuel at Mitzpah first had Israel remove the Baalim, and only then said kivtzu et kol Yisrael haMitzpatah vโ€™etpallel. The conclusion Rashi draws is the real verdict of the verse: you cannot bring them back to Me, therefore do not pray for them. The prohibition on intercession that chapter 7 issued and chapter 11 repeated is here given its reason. Prayer was never a lever for moving God around an unrepentant people; it was the second half of a process whose first half has failed. Metzudat David reads the pairing as an either-or, Moshe or Shmuel, meaning that even one such voice would suffice under any other circumstance and does not suffice now. And then the cold imperative: shalach meโ€™al panai vโ€™yetzeโ€™u, send them out of My sight and let them go. Radak notices how strange it is that the command is addressed to Yirmiyahu at all, and hears in it a bitter reassignment - if it is in your power to send them away, better that you send them than that you pray for them. The intercessor has been handed an eviction notice and told to serve it.

What follows in verses 2 through 4 is the shape of the refusal, built as fourfold catalogues that narrow as they go. First the answer to the question anah netze, to what shall we go forth: asher lamavet lamavet, those for death to death, those for the sword to the sword, those for famine to famine, those for captivity to captivity. Rashi and Radak both transmit the teaching of Chazal that the list is ordered by increasing severity - the sword is worse than plague because it disfigures and the bed does not, famine is worse than the sword because it tortures and the sword does not, as Eichah says tovim hayu chalelei cherev mechalelei raโ€™av, and captivity is worst of all because kulhu itnehu bah, all of them are contained within it. The verse reads like a census clerk assigning destinations, and that bureaucratic calm is its horror. Then verse 3, vโ€™hifkadti aleihem arba mishpachot, and I will appoint over them four families - Metzudat David and Radak both gloss mishpachot as four kinds of punishment, a metaphorical usage, while Rashi notes that pโ€™kidah here is the language of appointment and commission, as of officers given a post. The four posts are a descending scale of indignity: the sword to slay, the dogs to drag, the birds of the heaven and the beasts of the earth to devour and destroy. Metzudat David divides the last pair with grim care, the birds to eat the corpses and the animals to ruin them by trampling underfoot, and Radak notes that dogs habitually drag a carcass along while they eat it. The sword kills a person; everything after the sword happens to what is left, and the catalogue is really a description of a body no one will bury. Then verse 4 names the cause, and the name startles: bigelal Menasheh ven Yechizkiyahu melech Yehudah al asher asah bโ€™Yerushalayim. Menasheh has been dead for decades. Radak explains the charge in two parts - he led Yehudah into evil deeds, and he shed innocent blood until he filled Yerushalayim with corpses - and Metzudat David sharpens it into something more uncomfortable for the living: the meaning is that they have held fast to the deeds of Menasheh, and because he did what he did publicly, in the open in Yerushalayim, they learned from him and took hold of it. The generation is not being punished for an ancestorโ€™s sin; it is being punished for still committing it. And the sentence is lizvaah lโ€™chol mamlechot haโ€™aretz, a thing of shuddering, which Rashi derives from lo kam vโ€™lo za in Esther and glosses with devastating economy: whoever hears the evil that has come upon you will shudder. From verse 5 the oracle turns and speaks to the city as a woman, and the register changes from sentencing to lament, which is stranger and more painful than the sentencing was. Ki mi yachmol alayich Yerushalayim umi yanud lach umi yasur lishโ€™ol lโ€™shalom lach: who will pity you, who will turn aside to ask after your welfare? Rashi reads yanud as yekonen, who will compose a lament, and explains yasur as turning off oneโ€™s road to reach you. Radak reconstructs the whole social scene behind the verb - the comforters of a mourner come wandering in from here and from there to sit with him and recount his troubles with him - and then delivers the reason no one is coming: ki at garamt churbanech shenatasht oti, you caused your own ruin, for you abandoned Me. That is verse 6. At natasht oti neโ€™um Hashem, achor telechi, you have forsaken Me, you go backward; vaโ€™at et yadi alayich vaโ€™ashchitech, and then four of the most terrible words in the book, nilโ€™eiti hinachem, I am weary of relenting. Rashiโ€™s gloss is the theology of the chapter in one sentence: many times I planned to destroy and I relented of the evil; now I am weary of relenting. Radak says the same - how many times have I relented of the evil I spoke to do to them and did not do it; I have grown weary of this, I can relent no longer. What has broken is not Godโ€™s mercy but the mechanism by which mercy kept postponing judgment. The thirteen attributes include nicham al haraโ€™ah; here the attribute itself reports exhaustion. Then the images of the ending: vaโ€™ezrem bโ€™mizreh bโ€™shaโ€™arei haโ€™aretz, I winnowed them with a winnowing fork in the gates of the land, which Rashi explains with homely precision as a sieve, like one who winnows barley, so that they should not all be exiled to one place. Exile is not transport but dispersal, engineered so that no two grains land together. Shikalti ibadti et ami midarcheihem lo shavu - Metzudat David hears the logic as concessive, that even though I bereaved them and destroyed them they still did not turn from their ways and took no lesson, and Radak applies the clause historically to the ten tribes already gone, whose visible ruin taught Yehudah nothing. Then the widows, atzmu li almenotav mechol yamim, more numerous than the sand of the seas - and Metzudat David will not let that be read as triumph: I am not acting toward them as one who takes revenge, so that it would all count as little in My eyes; on the contrary, it counts before Me as much, and there is no joy in it for Me. Radak anchors the phrase in a real catastrophe, the day Pekach ben Remalyahu killed a hundred and twenty thousand men of Yehudah and left their wives widows. And over the mother, al em bachur shoded batzaharayim, Rashi identifies the em as Yerushalayim, which is an ir vโ€™em bโ€™Yisrael, and reads batzaharayim with chilling practicality: everything will be exposed before him, all their hidden treasures. The destroyer comes at noon not because noon is dramatic but because daylight is better for looting. Verse 9 closes the oracle with the figure who haunts the chapter: umlelah yoledet hashivโ€™ah, she who bore seven languishes, nafโ€™chah nafshah, ba shimshah bโ€™od yomam, her sun went down while it was yet day. Rashi and Metzudat David both identify her as Shomron and the northern kingdom, which produced seven royal dynasties - Yaravam ben Nevat and his house, Basha, Omri, Yehu, Menachem, Pekach, Hoshea - all already cut off and exiled, while Rashi reports the alternative of the Midrash Tanchuma which reads her as Yerushalayim and counts seven wicked kings of Yehudah instead. Radak takes shivโ€™ah as simple plenitude, many children, as in ad akarah yaldah shivโ€™ah. And bโ€™od yomam, Rashi says out of Gittin, means before their time; they hurried to fall. A woman whose sun sets at noon is a woman who has outlived every reason she had to live.

Then verse 10 breaks the frame entirely, and what had been an oracle about a nation becomes the third and rawest of Yirmiyahuโ€™s confessions. Oy li imi ki yelidtini ish riv vโ€™ish madon lโ€™chol haโ€™aretz. Woe is me, my mother, that you bore me, a man of strife and a man of contention to the whole earth. Metzudat David catches the gesture exactly: Yirmiyahu turned his speech toward his mother and said it to her, which is to say he has no one else to say it to, and so he addresses the one person implicated in his existence. Rashi states the cause plainly - he was lamenting over himself, that the people of his city hated him on account of his rebukes. And then the strangest argument in the verse, the one that shows how deep the wound is: lo nashiti vโ€™lo nashu vi kuloh mekalelavni, I have not lent and I have not borrowed, yet everyone curses me. Rashi and Metzudat David both unfold the logic of ordinary life behind it. Sometimes men quarrel with a lender because he presses for his money, and sometimes with a borrower because he will not repay; money is the normal reason a man is hated in his town. But I have lent to no one and borrowed from no one, and still every one of them curses me. Radak adds that there is nothing whatever of this, only that they hate me because I rebuke them for their own good. The complaint is not that he suffers but that his suffering has no transactional explanation; he is hated for the one service he renders, and Radakโ€™s etymology of mekalelavni catches even the texture of it, a word compounded from two roots, kalal and kalah, from cursing and from contempt, two wrongs fused into a single unparalleled form because the language needed a shorter way to say both at once. Against this God answers in verses 11 through 14, and the answer is at first oblique. Metzudat David hears it as consolation in the form of an oath: what do you care about their curse, behold I swear that I will leave you over for good, and all who curse you will die or go into captivity while you remain. Rashi records both the reading of Menachem, that sheritich is from sheโ€™erit, a remnant left over, and that of Dunash, that it is from the Aramaic mashre kitrin, untying knots, a release - in which case the promise is fulfilled precisely in chapter 40, hineh pitachtich hayom min haโ€™azikim asher al yadecha, behold I have loosed you today from the chains on your hand. And hifgaโ€™ti vecha, Rashi says, means that when the evil comes they will come begging you to seek mercy for them, as Tzidkiyahu will, derosh na baโ€™adenu et Hashem. Then verse 12, the hardest line in the chapter to construe: hayaroโ€™a barzel barzel mitzafon unchoshet. Rashiโ€™s reading turns it into an answer to verse 10 - Israel was compared to iron, holchei rachil nechoshet uโ€™varzel, and Yirmiyahu in chapter 1 was made amud barzel vโ€™chomot nechoshet, and his iron is stronger than theirs, so can their iron break yours? Metzudat David reads it as addressed to the nation and as a military taunt, do you imagine you can prevail against Nevuchadnetzar, whose northern iron is alloyed with bronze and harder still, and Radak gives the same, noting that Bavel is north of Eretz Yisrael, mitzafon tiftach haraโ€™ah. Either way the metallurgy is the point: the prophet has been forged out of the same material as the empire, which is why he will outlast the people he is sent to. Verses 13 and 14 finish the oracle against the nation - cheilcha vโ€™otzrotecha labaz eten lo vimchir, your wealth and your treasures I give as spoil without price, which Radak explains to mean that the looters will be so many that nothing will be sold or priced at all, each man simply seizing for himself - and then the fire kindled in My anger that burns against you.

Verse 15 is the heart of the chapter. Atah yadata, Hashem zochreni ufokdeni vโ€™hinakem li merodfai: You know - remember me, visit me, avenge me of my persecutors. Then al lโ€™erech apecha tikacheni, which Rashi renders after the Targum as lo titen archa lโ€™ulvani, do not grant a reprieve to my humiliation; do not take my case and leave it lying in Your longsuffering, but hurry and avenge me. Radak reads it still more darkly: if You are going to be patient with them, then at least do not take me, do not let me die, so that I may see Your vengeance on them. The prophet is asking not to be made a casualty of Godโ€™s own patience. And then da seโ€™eiti alecha cherpah, know that I have borne reproach for Your sake, which Metzudat David glosses as the reproach he bears on account of prophesying in Your name, and which Radak turns outward into a demand: show them that You knew and that it was not hidden from You. Verse 16 then gives the most beautiful description of prophetic experience in Nach, and its placement, wedged between a demand for vengeance and an accusation of betrayal, is what makes it almost unbearable. Nimtzeโ€™u devarecha vaโ€™ochlem, Your words were found and I ate them, vayhi devarcha li lโ€™sason ulsimchat levavi ki nikra shimcha alai. Radak explains ochlem plainly: when Your words were found to me in prophecy I received them willingly, the way a person eats food that is sweet to him - and he identifies exactly what the joy consisted of: in this I rejoiced greatly, that they would say of me, a prophet of Hashem, while the other prophets are called prophets of the Baโ€™al. And Rashi, with four words, sets a time-stamp on it that breaks the verse open: latavah mitechilah, eagerly, at the beginning - and they were a joy to me, ki dimiti sheyishmeโ€™u elai atah, for I imagined that now they would listen to me. The joy is reported in the past tense and explained as a misunderstanding. He ate the words gladly because he thought they would work. Verse 17 is the cost of that eating: lo yashavti bโ€™sod mesachakim vaโ€™eโ€™eloz, I did not sit in the circle of the merrymakers and rejoice; mipnei yadecha badad yashavti ki zaโ€™am mileitani. Rashi reads yadecha as the prophecy that came to him from You, and says he sat alone and stunned, in mourning, because You filled me with a prophecy of fury about the destruction of Your house. Radak draws the contrast that organizes the verse: Your word was the gladness of my heart, and by levavi he means the gladness of the intellect, but the other gladness, the gladness of the body, of sitting in their company while they laugh and laughing with them, that I never had; I had not even their companionship, but sat alone, secluded in my house. The man who ate the word found that it fed him and isolated him in the same motion, and Radak offers a second reading of mipnei yadecha, as Your blow rather than Your prophecy, the beatings and the contempt that were the peopleโ€™s answer to the words he had swallowed with such appetite. Which brings us to verse 18, where a prophet says what no prophet should be able to say. Lamah hayah cheโ€™evi netzach umakati anushah meโ€™anah herafei, why is my pain perpetual and my wound incurable, refusing to be healed? Rashi takes anushah as mortally sick, on the model of vayeiโ€™anash said of the child of Bat Sheva. Radak hears netzach as unending and daily, notes that a wound refusing to be healed is the language of poetry since a wound has no will of its own, and then lets the real question surface: lamah hayah zeh, mah avon yesh bi, why is this, what sin is there in me? And then the accusation. Hayo tihyeh li kโ€™mo achzav mayim lo neโ€™emanu, will You be to me as a deceitful thing, as waters that fail? Rashi glosses achzav as a spring that stops, the Old French faylayne, failing, and says it is like a man whose confidence has been cut off from him, for You leave me to suffer at their hands. Metzudat David reads it the same way, a source of water that is cut off and abandons, water that does not keep faith, meaning that You withdrew from me the help and rescue from those who rise against me. Radak sees exactly what the image is aimed at and names the target: the comparison is directed against God because of what He said to Yirmiyahu at the beginning of his prophecy, vโ€™ani hineh netaticha hayom lโ€™ir mivtzar ulโ€™amud barzel ulchomot nechoshet, and here they are, reproaching me and striking me. Radak concedes that chapter 1 had also said vโ€™nilchamu elecha, they will fight against you, but Yirmiyahu had assumed the fighting would be temporary and have an end, and when he saw that it had no end he complained against God. That is the charge in full: not that God is cruel but that God is unreliable, a wadi in the Negev that runs in the spring and is dry stone by the time the traveler who counted on it arrives. No one else in Tanakh accuses God of being an intermittent stream.

The answer in verses 19 through 21 is the reason this chapter matters more than almost any other in the book, because it is not a rebuke and not a consolation but a re-commissioning. Lachen koh amar Hashem im tashuv vaโ€™ashivecha lefanai taโ€™amod. Radak hears God answer the accusation head on: you spoke against Me words that are not right when you said hayo tihyeh li kโ€™mo achzav, and in this you sinned against Me; and now, if you return in teshuvah and regret what you said, I will bring you back and forgive you, and you will stand before Me as at first. And Radak adds the observation that seals the chapterโ€™s architecture: standing before Hashem means prayer and thanksgiving and the receiving of prophecy, and this idiom is used only of a prophet - the same amidah as in verse 1, im yaamod Moshe uShmuel lefanai. The chapter opened by telling him that the two greatest men ever to stand before God could not help this people, and it closes by telling him that he himself may stand there. Rashi and Metzudat David read im tashuv differently and beautifully, as addressed through Yirmiyahu to Israel - if you bring Israel back, I will bring them back through you - and vโ€™im totzi yakar mizolel kโ€™fi tihyeh, if you bring forth the precious out of the vile, if you can extract a fit man from a wicked one and turn him to repentance, then you shall be as My mouth. Rashiโ€™s gloss on kโ€™fi tihyeh is the boldest sentence in the commentaries on this chapter: sheโ€™ani gozer gezerah vโ€™atah mevatlah, that I decree a decree and you annul it. The man who a moment ago accused God of failing him is told that his word will carry the force of Godโ€™s own, and Radak cites the proof text about Shmuel, vโ€™lo hipil mikol devarav artzah - the second invocation of Shmuel in the chapter, this time not as an intercessor who would fail but as a prophet whose words never fell to the ground. Then the warning that protects him: yashuvu hemah elecha vโ€™atah lo tashuv aleihem, they shall return to you and you shall not return to them. Radakโ€™s reading is pastoral and precise, guard yourself that you not turn to their wickedness in the course of working on them, lest they lead you astray with the abundance of their arguments; labor to bring them to you and be careful not to go over to them. Metzudat David hears in it a release from Yirmiyahuโ€™s own fear, that he need not dread going out among them on his mission lest he learn from their deeds, because he can be secure in this. Then verse 20, the full restoration of the call: unetaticha laโ€™am hazeh lโ€™chomat nechoshet betzurah, I will make you to this people a fortified wall of bronze, vโ€™nilchamu elecha vโ€™lo yuchlu lach ki itcha ani lโ€™hoshiacha ulhatzilecha. Radak reads the verse as Godโ€™s direct rebuttal of achzav - I will not be like a man who deceives; rather, as I said to you at the beginning, so I will do - and then explains the mistake in Yirmiyahuโ€™s reading of chapter 1 with great care. I never said their war against you would last only a season; you did not understand My words well. What I promised was that they would not prevail over you, lo yuchlu lach lahamitecha, they will not be able to kill you; but they will indeed fight you, with words and with blows and with contempt, for as long as you rebuke them, and all this labor you will bear in order to bring them back to Me. And Radak finishes with the arithmetic of prophetic hope: even if you do not bring all of them back, it is impossible that you will not bring back some of them, as we saw when they wanted to kill him and the officers said ein laโ€™ish hazeh mishpat mavet ki bโ€™shem Hashem Elokeinu diber eleinu. Verse 21 closes it, vโ€™hitzaltich miyad raโ€™im ufditich mikaf aritzim, and Metzudat David names the raโ€™im without hesitation: they are the men of Anatot. The chapter has come all the way around. It began with the refusal of the two greatest prayers in Israelโ€™s history and ends with the renewal of one broken manโ€™s commission; it began with shalach meโ€™al panai, send them from My presence, and ends with lefanai taโ€™amod, you shall stand before Me. Nothing has been promised about the people. Everything has been promised about the prophet, and what he is promised is not relief but endurance - the wall of bronze was never a shelter, it was a position, and the only thing God undertakes is that it will hold.


ืคืจืง ื˜ืดื• ยท Chapter 15

ืคืกื•ืง ืืณ ยท Verse 1

Hebrew:

ื•ึทื™ึผึนึคืืžึถืจ ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธื”ึ™ ืึตืœึทึ”ื™ ืึดืึพื™ึทืขึฒืžึนึจื“ ืžึนืฉืึถึคื” ื•ึผืฉืึฐืžื•ึผืึตืœึ™ ืœึฐืคึธื ึทึ”ื™ ืึตึฅื™ืŸ ื ึทืคึฐืฉืึดึ–ื™ ืึถืœึพื”ึธืขึธึฃื ื”ึทื–ึผึถึ‘ื” ืฉืึทืœึผึทึฅื— ืžึตืขึทืœึพืคึผึธื ึทึ–ื™ ื•ึฐื™ึตืฆึตึฝืื•ึผืƒ

English:

GOD said to me, โ€œEven if Moses and Samuel were to intercede with Me, I would not be won over to that people. Dismiss them from My presence, and let them go forth!

Chapter 14's long intercession is answered with a refusal: im yaamod Moshe uShmuel lefanai ein nafshi el ha'am hazeh, though Moshe and Shmuel stood before Me, My soul would not be toward this people. Radak explains the pairing - both were Levites and prophets, and Shmuel was the greatest of the nevi'im after Moshe - and reads the whole verse as a retort to Yirmiyahu's praying: why multiply prayer, when those greater than you would not be heard? Rashi finds in the pairing a method rather than a compliment: each of those two first brought the people to repentance and only then prayed, Moshe after simu ish charbo and Shmuel after Israel removed the Baalim at Mitzpah - so the real verdict is that you cannot bring them back, therefore do not pray for them. Radak notes that the startling command shalach me'al panai is addressed to Yirmiyahu himself: if it is in your power to send them away, better that you send them than that you pray for them.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืžืฉื” ื•ืฉืžื•ืืœ. ืฉื ื™ื”ื ื ื–ืงืงื• ืœื‘ืงืฉ ืจื—ืžื™ื ืขืœ ื™ืฉืจืืœ ื•ืžืชื—ืœื” ื”ื—ื–ื™ืจื•ื ืœืžื•ื˜ื‘ ื•ืื—"ื› ื”ืชืคืœืœื• ืขืœื™ื”ื ื•ืœื ืขืœื” ื‘ืœื‘ื ืœื”ืฉื™ื‘ ืืคื™ ืขื“ ืฉื”ื—ื–ื™ืจื•ื ืœืžื•ื˜ื‘, ืžืฉื” ืฉื™ืžื• ืื™ืฉ ื—ืจื‘ื• ื•ื’ื•' (ืฉืžื•ืช ืœืดื‘:ืœืณ) ื•ื™ื–ืจ ืขืœ ืคื ื™ ื”ืžื™ื ื•ื’ื•' (ืฉื) ื•ืื—"ื› ืืขืœื” ืืœ ื”' ืื•ืœื™ ืื›ืคืจื”, ืฉืžื•ืืœ ื‘ืžืฆืคื” ื•ื™ืกื™ืจื• ื‘ื ื™ ื™ืฉืจืืœ ืืช ื”ื‘ืขืœื™ื (ืฉืžื•ืืœ ื ื–ืณ:ื”ืณ) ื•ืื—"ื› ืงื‘ืฆื• ืืช ื›ืœ ื™ืฉืจืืœ ื”ืžืฆืคืชื” ื•ืืชืคืœืœ ืขืœื™ื›ื (ืฉื) ืืชื” ืื™ื ืš ื™ื›ื•ืœ ืœื”ืฉื™ื‘ื ืืœื™ ืœื›ืš ืืœ ืชืชืคืœืœ ืขืœื™ื”ื: ื ืคืฉื™. ืจืฆื•ื ื™:
Moses and Samuel Both were needed to beg mercy for Israel, but first they induced them to repent, and afterwards they prayed on their behalf, but they had no idea of turning away My wrath until they had induced them to repent. Moses said (Exodus 32:27), "Let each man put his sword..." (v. 20) "and he scattered it on the surface of the water, etc." And afterwards (v. 30), "I will ascend to the Lord, perhaps I will atone." Samuel in Mizpah (I Samuel 7:4,5) "And the children of Israel removed the Baalim," and afterwards, "'Gather all Israel to Mizpah, and I shall pray to the Lord on your behalf (sic).'" But you cannot bring them back to Me, therefore do not pray for them. desire Heb. ื ึทืคึฐึนืฉึดื™ lit., My soul.

ืคืกื•ืง ื‘ืณ ยท Verse 2

Hebrew:

ื•ึฐื”ึธื™ึธึ›ื” ื›ึผึดื™ึพื™ึนืืžึฐืจึฅื•ึผ ืึตืœึถึ–ื™ืšึธ ืึธึฃื ึธื” ื ึตืฆึตึ‘ื ื•ึฐืึธืžึทืจึฐืชึผึธึจ ืึฒืœึตื™ื”ึถึœื ื›ึผึนื”ึพืึธืžึทึฃืจ ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ—ื” ืึฒืฉืึถึจืจ ืœึทืžึผึธึคื•ึถืช ืœึทืžึผึธึ™ื•ึถืชึ™ ื•ึทืึฒืฉืึถึคืจ ืœึทื—ึถึ™ืจึถื‘ึ™ ืœึทื—ึถึ”ืจึถื‘ ื•ึทืึฒืฉืึถึคืจ ืœึธืจึธืขึธื‘ึ™ ืœึธืจึธืขึธึ”ื‘ ื•ึทืึฒืฉืึถึฅืจ ืœึทืฉืึผึฐื‘ึดึ–ื™ ืœึทืฉืึผึถึฝื‘ึดื™ืƒ

English:

And if they ask you, โ€˜To what shall we go forth?โ€™ answer them, โ€˜Thus said GOD: Those destined for the plague, to the plague; Those destined for the sword, to the sword; Those destined for famine, to famine; Those destined for captivity, to captivity.

To the question anah netze, to what shall we go forth, the answer is a clerk's manifest: those for death to death, those for the sword to the sword, those for famine to famine, those for captivity to captivity. Rashi and Radak both transmit the teaching of Chazal that each item is harsher than the one before it - the sword disfigures where death in bed does not, famine tortures where the sword does not, as Eichah says tovim hayu chalelei cherev mechalelei ra'av - and that captivity is worst of all, kulhu itnehu bah, because all of them are contained within it. Metzudat David reads the assignments as exactly fitted to desert, each one punished by the thing appropriate to him.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืืฉืจ ืœืžื•ืช ื•ื’ื•'. ื›ืœ ื”ืžืื•ื—ืจ ื‘ืค' ืงืฉื” ืžื—ื‘ื™ืจื• ื—ืจื‘ ืงืฉื” ืžืžื•ืช ืžื™ืชืช ื—ืจื‘ ืžื ื•ื•ืœืช ื•ืžื™ืชื” ืขืœ ืžื˜ืชื• ืื™ื ื” ืžื ื•ื•ืœืช ื•ื›ืŸ ื”ื•ื ืื•ืžืจ (ืชื”ื™ืœื™ื ืงื˜ืดื–:ื˜ืดื•) ื™ืงืจ ื‘ืขื™ื ื™ ื”' ื”ืžื•ืชื” ืœื—ืกื™ื“ื™ื• ืจืขื‘ ืงืฉื” ืžื—ืจื‘ ืฉื–ื” ืžืฆื˜ืขืจ ื•ื–ื” ืื™ื ื• ืžืฆื˜ืขืจ ื•ื›ืŸ ื”ื•ื ืื•ืžืจ ื˜ื•ื‘ื™ื ื”ื™ื• ื—ืœืœื™ ื—ืจื‘ ืžื—ืœืœื™ ืจืขื‘ ืฉื‘ื™ ื›ื•ืœื”ื• ืื™ืชื ื”ื• ื‘ื’ื•ื”:
Such as are for death, to death Each calamity mentioned later in this verse is harsher than the one preceding it. The sword is harsher than death. Death by the sword is defacing, whereas death in bed is not defacing. And so he says (Psalms 116:15): "Precious in the eyes of the Lord is the death of His Saints." Famine is harsher than the sword, for this one is agonizing whereas the other is not agonizing. And so Scripture states (Lam. 4:9): "Better are those who die from the sword than those who die from famine." Captivity - all sorts of death are in it.

ืคืกื•ืง ื’ืณ ยท Verse 3

Hebrew:

ื•ึผืคึธืงึทื“ึฐืชึผึดึจื™ ืขึฒืœึตื™ื”ึถึœื ืึทืจึฐื‘ึผึทึคืข ืžึดืฉืึฐืคึผึธื—ื•ึนืชึ™ ื ึฐืึปืึพื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ”ื” ืึถืชึพื”ึทื—ึถึฃืจึถื‘ ืœึทื”ึฒืจึนึ”ื’ ื•ึฐืึถืชึพื”ึทื›ึผึฐืœึธื‘ึดึ–ื™ื ืœึดืกึฐื—ึนึ‘ื‘ ื•ึฐืึถืชึพืขึงื•ึนืฃ ื”ึทืฉืึผึธืžึทึ›ื™ึดื ื•ึฐืึถืชึพื‘ึผึถื”ึฑืžึทึฅืช ื”ึธืึธึ–ืจึถืฅ ืœึถืึฑื›ึนึฅืœ ื•ึผืœึฐื”ึทืฉืึฐื—ึดึฝื™ืชืƒ

English:

And I will appoint over them four kinds [of punishment]โ€”declares GODโ€”the sword to slay, the dogs to drag, the birds of the sky, and the beasts of the earth to devour and destroy.

Four destroyers are commissioned: the sword to slay, the dogs to drag, the birds of the heaven and the beasts of the earth to devour and destroy. Rashi notes that p'kidah here is the language of appointment and commission, as of officers given a post, while Metzudat David and Radak gloss mishpachot metaphorically as four kinds of punishment. Radak observes that dogs habitually drag a carcass along as they eat it, and Metzudat David divides the last pair with grim care - the birds to eat the corpses, the beasts to ruin them by trampling underfoot. Only the first of the four actually kills; the remaining three are what happens to a body that no one will bury.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื•ืคืงื“ืชื™. ืœืฉื•ืŸ ืžื™ื ื•ื™ ื•ืคืงื™ื“ื•ืช: ืœืกื—ื•ื‘. ืœื’ืจืจ ื•ื›ืŸ ืื ืœื ื™ืกื—ื‘ื•ื (ืœืงืžืŸ ืžื˜):
And I will appoint an expression of appointment and designation. to drag to drag. Cf. (infra. 49: 20) "If the young of the sheep do not drag them (ื™ึดืกึฐื—ึธื‘ื•ึผื)."

ืคืกื•ืง ื“ืณ ยท Verse 4

Hebrew:

ื•ึผื ึฐืชึทืชึผึดึฃื™ื (ืœื–ื•ืขื”) [ืœึฐื–ึทืขึฒื•ึธึ”ื”] ืœึฐื›ึนึ–ืœ ืžึทืžึฐืœึฐื›ึฃื•ึนืช ื”ึธืึธึ‘ืจึถืฅ ื‘ึผึดึ ื’ึฐืœึทึ ืœ ืžึฐื ึทืฉืึผึถึคื” ื‘ึถืŸึพื™ึฐื—ึดื–ึฐืงึดื™ึผึธึ™ื”ื•ึผึ™ ืžึถึฃืœึถืšึฐ ื™ึฐื”ื•ึผื“ึธึ”ื” ืขึทึฅืœ ืึฒืฉืึถืจึพืขึธืฉื‚ึธึ–ื” ื‘ึผึดื™ืจื•ึผืฉืึธืœึธึฝอึดืืƒ

English:

I will make them a horror to all the kingdoms of the earth, on account of King Manasseh son of Hezekiah of Judah, and of what he did in Jerusalem.โ€™โ€

The cause is named, and the name startles: bigelal Menasheh ven Yechizkiyahu melech Yehudah, on account of Menasheh son of Chizkiyahu king of Yehudah, for what he did in Yerushalayim - a king dead for decades. Radak states the charge in two parts, that he led Yehudah into evil deeds and shed innocent blood until he filled Yerushalayim with corpses. Metzudat David shifts the weight onto the living: the meaning is that they have held fast to the deeds of Menasheh, and because he acted publicly and in the open in Yerushalayim they learned from him and took hold of it. Rashi derives lizvaah from lo kam v'lo za in Esther and glosses it with economy - whoever hears the evil that has come upon you will shudder.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืœื–ืขื•ื”. ืžื’ื–ืจืช ืœื ืงื ื•ืœื ื–ืข (ืืกืชืจ ื”ืณ:ื˜ืณ) ื•ื›ืžื•ื”ื• ื’ืื•ื” ืžื’ื–ืจืช ื’ื ืžืื“ (ื™ืฉืขื™ื” ื˜ื•): ืœื›ืœ ืžืžืœื›ื•ืช ื”ืืจืฅ. ื›ืœ ื”ืฉื•ืžืข ืจืขื” ืฉื‘ืื” ืขืœื™ื”ื ื™ื–ื•ืข:
a horror from the same root as (Esther 5:9), "And he neither rose nor quaked (ื–ึธืข)." Similarly, ื’ึผึทืึฒื•ึธื” pride, from the root (Isa. 16:6) "Have become very proud (ื’ึผึตื)." to all the kingdoms of the earth Anyone who hears the evil that has befallen you will shudder.

ืคืกื•ืง ื”ืณ ยท Verse 5

Hebrew:

ื›ึผึดึ ื™ ืžึดึฝื™ึพื™ึทื—ึฐืžึนึคืœ ืขึธืœึทึ™ื™ึดืšึฐึ™ ื™ึฐืจึฃื•ึผืฉืึธืœึทึ”อึดื ื•ึผืžึดึ–ื™ ื™ึธื ึฃื•ึผื“ ืœึธึ‘ืšึฐ ื•ึผืžึดึฃื™ ื™ึธืกึ”ื•ึผืจ ืœึดืฉืึฐืึนึฅืœ ืœึฐืฉืึธืœึนึ–ื ืœึธึฝืšึฐืƒ

English:

But who will pity you, O Jerusalem, Who will console you? Who will turn aside to inquire About your welfare?

The oracle now turns and addresses the city as a woman, and the register shifts from sentencing to lament: who will pity you, Yerushalayim, who will turn aside to ask after your welfare? Rashi reads yanud as yekonen, who will compose a lament, and explains yasur as turning off one's road to reach you. Radak reconstructs the whole social scene behind the verb - the comforters of a mourner come wandering in from here and from there to sit with him and recount his troubles with him - and then supplies the reason no one is coming: ki at garamt churbanech shenatasht oti, you caused your own ruin, for you abandoned Me.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื™ื ื•ื“. ื™ืงื•ื ืŸ: ื•ืžื™ ื™ืกื•ืจ. ืืœื™ืš ืœื ื˜ื•ืช ืžื“ืจื›ื• ืืœื™ืš ืœืฉืื•ืœ ืœืš ืœืฉืœื•ื:
will lament Heb. ื™ึธื ื•ึผื“. and who will turn aside to you, to turn aside from his road to you, to ask of your welfare?

ืคืกื•ืง ื•ืณ ยท Verse 6

Hebrew:

ืึทึฃืชึผึฐ ื ึธื˜ึทึฅืฉืึฐืชึผึฐ ืึนืชึดึ›ื™ ื ึฐืึปืึพื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ–ื” ืึธื—ึฃื•ึนืจ ืชึผึตืœึตึ‘ื›ึดื™ ื•ึธืึทึจื˜ ืึถืชึพื™ึธื“ึดึคื™ ืขึธืœึทึ™ื™ึดืšึฐึ™ ื•ึธึฝืึทืฉืึฐื—ึดื™ืชึตึ”ืšึฐ ื ึดืœึฐืึตึ–ื™ืชึดื™ ื”ึดื ึผึธื—ึตึฝืืƒ

English:

You cast Me off โ€”declares GODโ€” You go ever backward. So I have stretched out My hand to destroy you; I cannot relent.

At natasht oti, you have forsaken Me, says the Lord, achor telechi, you go backward - and therefore I stretched out My hand against you and destroyed you. The verse ends with four of the most terrible words in the book, nil'eiti hinachem, I am weary of relenting, and Rashi's gloss is the theology of the chapter in one sentence: many times I planned to destroy and relented of the evil, and now I am weary of relenting. Radak and Metzudat David say the same, that the decree of destruction had been issued again and again and withdrawn each time. What has broken is not God's mercy but the mechanism by which mercy kept postponing judgment.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื ืœืืชื™ ื”ื ื—ื. ื›ืžื” ืคืขืžื™ื ื—ืฉื‘ืชื™ ืœื”ืฉื—ื™ืช ื•ื ื—ืžืชื™ ืขืœ ื”ืจืขื” ืขืชื” ื ืœืื™ืชื™ ื”ื ื—ื, ื”ื ื—ื ื“ืคื•ืจืคื ืฉื™"ืจ ื‘ืœืขื–:
I am weary of repenting Many times I planned to destroy but repented of the evil. Now I am weary of repenting. ื”ึดื ึธื—ึตื (Dporpnser in O.F.)

ืคืกื•ืง ื–ืณ ยท Verse 7

Hebrew:

ื•ึธืึถื–ึฐืจึตึฅื ื‘ึผึฐืžึดื–ึฐืจึถึ–ื” ื‘ึผึฐืฉืึทืขึฒืจึตึฃื™ ื”ึธืึธึ‘ืจึถืฅ ืฉืึดื›ึผึทึคืœึฐืชึผึดื™ ืึดื‘ึผึทึ™ื“ึฐืชึผึดื™ึ™ ืึถืชึพืขึทืžึผึดึ”ื™ ืžึดื“ึผึทืจึฐื›ึตื™ื”ึถึ–ื ืœื•ึนืึพืฉืึธึฝื‘ื•ึผืƒ

English:

I will scatter them as with a winnowing fork Through the settlements of the earth. I will bereave, I will destroy My people, For they would not turn back from their ways.

I winnowed them with a winnowing fork in the gates of the land. Rashi explains the image with homely precision - a sieve, like one who winnows barley, so that they should not all be exiled to one place - which makes exile not transport but engineered dispersal. Metzudat David hears shikalti ibadti as concessive: even though I bereaved them and destroyed them, still they did not turn from their ways and took no lesson. Radak applies the clause historically to the ten tribes already gone, whose visible ruin taught the men of Yehudah who watched it nothing at all.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื‘ืžื–ืจื”. ื ืคื” ืฉืงื•ืจื™ืŸ ื•ื•"ืŸ ื‘ืœืขื– ื›ื–ื” ืฉื”ื•ื ื–ื•ืจื” ืฉืขื•ืจื™ืŸ ืฉืœื ื™ื”ื• ื›ื•ืœืŸ ื’ื•ืœื™ืŸ ืœืžืงื•ื ืื—ื“:
with a sieve A sieve called (van in French), like one who winnows barley, so that they should not all be exiled to one place.

ืคืกื•ืง ื—ืณ ยท Verse 8

Hebrew:

ืขึธึฝืฆึฐืžื•ึผึพืœึดึคื™ ืึทืœึฐืžึฐื ื•ึนืชึธื•ึ™ ืžึตื—ึฃื•ึนืœ ื™ึทืžึผึดึ”ื™ื ื”ึตื‘ึตึจืืชึดื™ ืœึธื”ึถึฅื ืขึทืœึพืึตึ›ื ื‘ึผึธื—ึ–ื•ึผืจ ืฉืึนื“ึตึฃื“ ื‘ึผึทึฝืฆึผื‡ื”ึณืจึธึ‘ื™ึดื ื”ึดืคึผึทึคืœึฐืชึผึดื™ ืขึธืœึถึ™ื™ื”ึธึ™ ืคึผึดืชึฐืึนึ”ื ืขึดึ–ื™ืจ ื•ึผื‘ึถื”ึธืœึฝื•ึนืชืƒ

English:

Their widows shall be more numerous Than the sands of the seas. I will bring against themโ€” Young men and mothers together โ€” A destroyer at noonday. I will bring down suddenly upon them Alarm and terror.

Their widows grew more numerous before Me than the sand of the seas. Metzudat David refuses to let that be read as triumph: I am not acting toward them as one who takes vengeance, so that it would all count as little in My eyes; on the contrary, it counts before Me as much, and there is no joy in it for Me. Radak anchors the line in a specific catastrophe, the day Pekach ben Remalyahu killed a hundred and twenty thousand men of Yehudah and left their wives widows. Rashi identifies the em as Yerushalayim, an ir v'em b'Yisrael, and reads shoded batzaharayim with chilling practicality - everything will be exposed before him, all their hidden treasures; the destroyer comes at noon because daylight is better for looting.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืขืฆืžื• ืœื™. ืจื‘ื• ืœืคื ื™ ืืœืžื ื•ืชื™ื•: ืขืœ ืื. ืขืœ ื™ืจื•ืฉืœื™ื ืฉื”ื™ืชื” ืขื™ืจ ื•ืื ื‘ื™ืฉืจืืœ: ื•ื‘ืฆื”ืจื™ื. ื”ื›ืœ ื™ื”ื ื’ืœื•ื™ ืœืคื ื™ื• ื›ืœ ื’ื ื–ื™ ืžื˜ืžื•ื ื: ื”ืคืœืชื™ ืขืœื™ื” ืคืชืื•ื ืขื™ืจ. ื”ืฉื›ื ืชื™ ืขืœื™ื”ื ืคืชืื•ื ื’ื™ื™ืกื•ืช ืฉืœ ืขื™ืจ ื•ื‘ื”ืœื•ืช ืจื‘ื•ืช, ื•ื™ืฉ ืคื•ืชืจื™ื ืขื™ืจ ืœ' ืฉื•ื ื ื›ืžื• ื•ื™ื”ื™ ืขืจื™ืš (ืฉืžื•ืืœ ื ื›ืดื—:ื˜ืดื–) ื•ืคืฉืจื™' ืœืขืจืš (ื“ื ื™ืืœ ื’):
are to Me more numerous His widows are more to Me. upon a mother Upon Jerusalem, which is a city and a mother in Israel. at midday Everything will be exposed before him, all their hidden treasures. I have cast upon her suddenly a city I caused the troops of a city and many terrors to rest upon her. Some interpret ืขึดื™ืจ as 'an enemy.' Cf. (I Sam. 28:16), "And has become [the supporter of] your adversary (ืขึธืจึถืšึธ)" (see also Dan. 4:16).

ืคืกื•ืง ื˜ืณ ยท Verse 9

Hebrew:

ืึปืžึฐืœึฐืœึธึžื” ื™ึนืœึถึฃื“ึถืช ื”ึทืฉืึผึดื‘ึฐืขึธึ—ื” ื ึธืคึฐื—ึธึฅื” ื ึทืคึฐืฉืึธึ›ื”ึผ (ื‘ืื”) [ื‘ึผึธึฅื] ืฉืึดืžึฐืฉืึธึ›ื”ึผ ื‘ึผึฐืขึนึฅื“ ื™ื•ึนืžึธึ–ื ื‘ึผึฃื•ึนืฉืึธื” ื•ึฐื—ึธืคึตึ‘ืจึธื” ื•ึผืฉืึฐืึตืจึดื™ืชึธึ—ื ืœึทื—ึถึงืจึถื‘ ืึถืชึผึตึ›ืŸ ืœึดืคึฐื ึตึฅื™ ืึนื™ึฐื‘ึตื™ื”ึถึ–ื ื ึฐืึปืึพื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึฝื”ืƒย {ืก} ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย 

English:

She who bore seven is forlorn, Utterly disconsolate; Her sun has set while it is still day, She is shamed and humiliated. The remnant of them I will deliver to the sword, To the power of their enemies โ€”declares GOD.

Umlelah yoledet hashiv'ah, she who bore seven languishes, her sun going down while it was yet day. Rashi and Metzudat David both identify her as Shomron and the northern kingdom, which produced seven royal dynasties - Yaravam ben Nevat, Basha, Omri, Yehu, Menachem, Pekach and Hoshea, each with his house - all already cut off and exiled, while the remnant to be given to the sword is Yehudah and part of Binyamin. Rashi also reports the Midrash Tanchuma reading her as Yerushalayim and counting seven wicked kings of Yehudah instead, and notes from Gittin that b'od yomam means before their time: they hurried to fall. Radak takes shiv'ah as simple plenitude, many children, as in ad akarah yaldah shiv'ah.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืืžืœืœื” ื™ื•ืœื“ืช ื”ืฉื‘ืขื”. ืฉื•ืžืจื•ืŸ ื•ื›ื ืกื™ื™ื” ืฉืœ ืขืฉืจืช ืฉื‘ื˜ื™ื ืฉืขืžื“ื• ืžื”ื ื–' ืžืฉืคื—ื•ืช ื›ื‘ืจ ืื•ืžืœืœื” ื•ื’ืœืชื”: ื•ืฉืืจื™ืชื. ืืœื• ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ื•ืงืฆืช ื‘ื ื™ืžืŸ ืฉื ืฉืชื™ื™ืจื• ื‘ื™ืฉืจืืœ ืœื—ืจื‘ ืืชืŸ ืืœื• ื”ืŸ ืฉื‘ืข ืžืฉืคื—ื•ืช ื™ืจื‘ืขื ื‘ืŸ ื ื‘ื˜ ื•ื‘ื™ืชื• ื‘ืขืฉื ื•ื‘ื™ืชื• ืขืžืจื™ ื•ื‘ื™ืชื• ื™ื”ื•ื ื•ื‘ื™ืชื• ืžื ื—ื ื•ื‘ื™ืชื• ืคืงื— ื•ื‘ื™ืชื• ื”ื•ืฉืข ื•ื‘ื™ืชื•: ื ืคื—ื” ื ืคืฉื”. ืœ' ื“ืื‘ื” ื ืคืฉื” ืžืชืจื’ืžื™ื ืŸ ื•ื“ืื‘ื•ืŸ ื ืคืฉ (ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ื›ืดื—:ืกืดื”) ื•ืžืคื—ืŸ ื ืคืฉ: ื‘ืขื•ื“ ื™ื•ืžื. ื‘ืœื ื–ืžื ื ืžื”ืจื• ืœื™ืคื•ืœ ื›ืš ื ื“ืจืฉ ื‘ืžืก' ื’ื™ื˜ื™ืŸ, ื•ื‘ืžื“ืจืฉ ืจื‘ื™ ืชื ื—ื•ืžื ื“ืจืฉื• ื›ืœืคื™ ื™ืจื•ืฉืœื™ื ื•ืžื•ื ื” ืฉื‘ืขื” ืจืฉืขื™ื ื™ื”ื•ืจื ื™ื”ื•ืืฉ ืื—ื– ืžื ืฉื” ืืžื•ืŸ ื™ื”ื•ื™ืงื™ื ืฆื“ืงื™ื”ื• ืืš ื™ืฉ ืœืžื ื•ืช ืขื•ื“ ืจื—ื‘ืขื ืื‘ื™ื” ืืžืฆื™ื” ืื—ื–ื™ื”: ื•ื—ืคืจื”. ืœ' ื‘ื•ืฉืช:
She who bore seven Samaria and the nation of the Ten Tribes, from whom rose seven dynasties of wicked kings, has already been cut off and exiled. and their remnant These are Judah and part of Benjamin, who remained in Israel. I shall deliver them to the sword. These are the seven dynasties: Jeroboam son of Nebat and his dynasty, Baasha and his dynasty, Omri and his dynasty, Jehu and his dynasty, Menahem and his dynasty, Pekah and his dynasty, Hoshea and his dynasty. her soul grieves an expression of 'her soul grieves.' We translate (Deut. 28:65) "And grieving of the soul (ื•ึฐื“ึทืึฒื‘ื•ึนืŸ ื ึถืคึนึถืฉ)" as ื•ึผืžึทืคึผึฐื—ึทืŸ ื ึฐืคึนึธืฉ. when it is still day Before its time, they hastened to fall. In this manner it is expounded in Tractate Gittin. [See Gittin 88a]. And in the Midrash of Rabbi Tanhuma (Tanhuma Buber, Vayetze p. 153) it is expounded as referring to Jerusalem, and he counts seven wicked men: Jehoram, Jehoash, Ahaz, Manasseh, Amon, Jehoiakim, and Zedekiah. But there are yet to count Rehoboam, Abijah, Amaziah, and Ahaziah. and confounded an expression of shame.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืณ ยท Verse 10

Hebrew:

ืึฝื•ึนื™ึพืœึดึฃื™ ืึดืžึผึดึ”ื™ ื›ึผึดึฃื™ ื™ึฐืœึดื“ึฐืชึผึดึ—ื ึดื™ ืึดึฅื™ืฉื ืจึดึ›ื™ื‘ ื•ึฐืึดึฅื™ืฉื ืžึธื“ึ–ื•ึนืŸ ืœึฐื›ื‡ืœึพื”ึธืึธึ‘ืจึถืฅ ืœึนึฝืึพื ึธืฉืึดึฅื™ืชึดื™ ื•ึฐืœึนืึพื ึธึฝืฉืื•ึผึพื‘ึดึ–ื™ ื›ึผึปืœึผึนึฅื” ืžึฐืงึทึฝืœึฐืœึทึฝื•ึฐื ึดื™ืƒย {ืก} ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย 

English:

Woe is me, my mother, that you ever bore meโ€” A man of conflict and strife with all the land! I have not lent, And I have not borrowed; Yet everyone curses me.

This is the third and rawest of Yirmiyahu's confessions: oy li imi ki yelidtini, woe is me, my mother, that you bore me, a man of strife and contention to the whole earth. Metzudat David catches the gesture exactly, that Yirmiyahu turned his speech toward his mother and said it to her - which is to say he has no one else to say it to. Rashi states the cause plainly, that he was lamenting over himself because the people of his city hated him on account of his rebukes. The strangest argument is the last: Rashi and Metzudat David both explain lo nashiti v'lo nashu vi as a denial of the ordinary reasons men quarrel, since sometimes a lender is hated for pressing his claim and sometimes a borrower for refusing to pay, and Radak adds that there is nothing whatever of this - they hate him only because he rebukes them for their own good.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืื•ื™ ืœื™ ืืžื™. ื™ืจืžื™ื” ื”ื™ื” ืžืชืื•ื ืŸ ืขืœ ืขืฆืžื• ืฉื”ื™ื• ืฉื•ื ืื™ืŸ ืื•ืชื• ื‘ื ื™ ืขื™ืจื• ืขืœ ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืชื•ื›ื—ื•ืชื™ื•: ื•ืื™ืฉ ืžื“ื•ืŸ. ืื™ืฉ ืžืจื™ื‘ื” ื›ืžื• ืœื ื™ื“ื•ืŸ ืจื•ื—ื™ (ื‘ืจืืฉื™ืช ื•ืณ:ื’ืณ): ืœื ื ืฉื™ืชื™. ื›ืžื• ืœื ืชื”ื™ื” ืœื• ื›ื ื•ืฉื” (ืฉืžื•ืช ื›ืดื‘:ื›ืดื“): ื›ืœื” ืžืงืœืœื•ื ื™. ืื™ื ื™ ืจื‘ ืขืžื”ื ืขืœ ืขืกืงื™ ืžืžื•ืŸ ืฉื™ืฉ ืœื™ ืขืœื™ื”ื ื•ืœื ืœื”ื ืขืœื™ ื•ื”ืจื™ ื›ืœ ื”ืขื ืžืงืœืœื ื™:
Woe is to me, my mother Jeremiah was complaining about himself, that his townsmen hated him because of his castigations. and a man of contention a man of quarrel, Cf. (Gen. 6:3) "Let My spirit not contend (ื™ึธื“ื•ึนืŸ)." I have not lent Cf. (Exodus 22:24) "You shall not be to him as a creditor (ื›ึผึฐื ึนึนึนืฉึถื”)." they curse me I do not quarrel with them concerning matters of money that I claim from them, neither have they made any claim on me, yet all the people curse me.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื ยท Verse 11

Hebrew:

ืึธืžึทึฃืจ ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ”ื” ืึดืึพืœึนึฅื (ืฉืจื•ืชืš) [ืฉืึตืจึดื™ืชึดึ–ื™ืšึธ] ืœึฐื˜ึ‘ื•ึนื‘ ืึดืึพืœึฃื•ึนืโ€‰ื€ ื”ึดืคึฐื’ึผึทึฃืขึฐืชึผึดึฝื™ ื‘ึฐืšึธึ— ื‘ึผึฐืขึตึฅืช ืจึธืขึธึ›ื” ื•ึผื‘ึฐืขึตึฅืช ืฆึธืจึธึ–ื” ืึถืชึพื”ึธืึนื™ึตึฝื‘ืƒ

English:

GOD said: Surely, a mere remnant of you Will I spare for a better fate! By the enemy from the north In a time of distress and a time of disaster, Surely, I will have you struck down!

God's first answer is oblique and takes the form of an oath. Metzudat David hears it as consolation: what do you care about their curse - behold I swear that I will leave you over for good, while all who curse you will die or go into captivity. Rashi preserves two readings of sheritich, that of Menachem taking it from she'erit, a remnant left over, and that of Dunash taking it from the Aramaic mashre kitrin, untying knots, in which case the promise is fulfilled in chapter 40, hineh pitachtich hayom min ha'azikim, behold I have loosed you today from the chains on your hand. Rashi and Metzudat David both read hifga'ti vecha as the enemy and the people coming to beg him at the time of trouble - Tzidkiyahu's derosh na ba'adenu et Hashem, and Nevuzaradan's invitation to come with him to Bavel.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืฉืจื™ืชื™ืš. ื”ืฉืืจืชื™ืš ืœ' ืฉืืจื™ืช ื•ื›ืŸ ืคืชืจื• ืžื ื—ื ืื‘ืœ ื“ื•ื ืฉ ืคืชืจ ืื•ืชื• ืœ' ื”ืชืจื” ื•ืฉืจื™ืชื™ืš ื›ืžื• (ื“ื ื™ืืœ ื”ืณ:ื™ืดื‘) ืžืฉืจื™ ืงื˜ืจื™ืŸ ื•ืคืชืจื•ืŸ ืฉืจื™ืชื™ืš ื›ืŸ ื”ื•ื ืฉื ืืžืจ ื”ื ื” ืคืชื—ืชื™ืš ื”ื™ื•ื ืžืŸ ื”ืื–ื™ืงื™ื (ืœืงืžืŸ ืž) ื›ืœื•ืžืจ ื‘ื™ื•ื ืืฉืจ ื”ืงื™ื ื”' ืืช ื“ื‘ืจื• ื ืืžืจ ืœื• ื•ืขืชื” ื”ื ื” ืคืชื—ืชื™ืš ื”ื™ื•ื ืžืŸ ื”ืื–ื™ืงื™ื ืืฉืจ ืขืœ ื™ื“ื™ืš ืื ื˜ื•ื‘ ื‘ืขื™ื ื™ืš ืœื‘ื•ื ืืชื™ ื‘ื‘ืœื”, ื•ื’ื ื™ืฉืจืืœ ื‘ืงืฉื• ืžืžื ื• ืฉื™ืชืคืœืœ ื‘ืฉื‘ื™ืœื ื›ืืฉืจ ื ืืžืจ ืœื• ื”ืชืคืœืœ ื‘ืขื“ื™ื ื• ืืœ ื”' ืืœื”ื™ื ื• ื›ื™ ื ืฉืืจื ื• ืžืขื˜ ืžื”ืจื‘ื” (ืœืงืžืŸ ืžื‘): ืื ืœื. ืœ' ืฉื‘ื•ืข': ื”ืคื’ืขืชื™ ื‘ืš ื‘ืขืช ืจืขื”. ืืช ื”ืื•ื™ื‘ ื›ืฉืชื‘ื ืขืœื™ื”ื ื”ืจืขื” ื™ืคื’ืขื• ื‘ืš ืฉืชื‘ืงืฉ ืจื—ืžื™ื ืขืœื™ื”ื ื›ื’ื•ืŸ ืฆื“ืงื™ื” ืืžืจ ืœื• ื“ืจืฉ ื ื ื‘ืขื“ื ื• ืืช ื”' ื•ื’ื•' ื“"ื ื ื‘ื•ื–ืจืื“ืŸ ื™ื‘ืงืฉ ืžืืชืš ืื ื˜ื•ื‘ ื‘ืขื™ื ื™ืš ืœื‘ื ืืชื™ ื‘ื‘ืœื” (ืœืงืžืŸ ืž):
1 leave you over I leave you over, an expression of a remnant. In this manner, Menahem (Machbereth p. 181) interpreted it, but Dunash (Teshuvoth Dunash p. 36) interpreted it as an expression of release. And ืฉึตืจึดื™ืชึดื™ืšึธ is like (Dan. 5:12) "And untying (ื•ึผืžึนึฐืฉึธืจึตื) knots," and the interpretation of ืฉึตืจึดื™ืชึดื™ืšึธ is so, as it is stated (below 40:4): "Behold I have released you from the chains that are on your hand." That is to say, on that day that the Lord fulfilled His word, it was said to him, "And now, behold I have released you today from the chains that are on your hand, if it pleases you to come with me to Babylon." And also, Israel begged him to pray for them, as it was said to him (below 42:4): "Pray on our behalf to the Lord our Cod, for we remain few from many." Verily I will lit., if not, an expression of an oath. I will cause [them] to beg you in time of evil with the enemy. When evil befalls them, they will beg you to supplicate God for mercy upon them, for example, Zedekiah said to him, (below 21:2) "Beseech God now on our behalf, etc." Another explanation. Nebuzaradan will beg you (below 40:4), "If it pleases you to come with me to Babylon."

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื‘ ยท Verse 12

Hebrew:

ื”ึฒื™ึธืจึนึจืขึท ื‘ึผึทืจึฐื–ึถึงืœโ€‰ื€โ€‰ื‘ึผึทืจึฐื–ึถึ›ืœ ืžึดืฆึผึธืคึ–ื•ึนืŸ ื•ึผื ึฐื—ึนึฝืฉืึถืชืƒ

English:

Can iron break iron and bronze?

Hayaro'a barzel barzel mitzafon unchoshet, can iron break iron from the north, and bronze? Rashi says the iron that comes from the north is harder than other iron, and reads the verse as a reply to verse 10: Israel was likened to iron, holchei rachil nechoshet u'varzel, while Yirmiyahu in chapter 1 was made an amud barzel and chomot nechoshet - so can their iron break yours? Metzudat David and Radak read it instead as a taunt addressed to the nation, that the northern iron alloyed with bronze is Nevuchadnetzar, who will far outmatch them in war, and Radak notes that Bavel lies north of Eretz Yisrael, mitzafon tiftach hara'ah. Either way the metallurgy is the point: the prophet is forged of the same material as the empire.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื”ื™ืจื•ืข ื‘ืจื–ืœ ื‘ืจื–ืœ ืžืฆืคื•ืŸ. ืื•ืžืจ ืื ื™ ื‘ืจื–ืœ ื”ื‘ื ืžืฆืคื•ืŸ ืงืฉื” ืžืฉืืจ ื‘ืจื–ืœ ื•ื›ืŸ ืคืชืจื•ื ื• ื”ื ื ืžืฉืœื• ืœื‘ืจื–ืœ ื”ื•ืœื›ื™ ืจื›ื™ืœ ื ื—ืฉืช ื•ื‘ืจื–ืœ (ืœืขื™ืœ ื•) ื•ื‘ื™ืจืžื™ื” ื ืืžืจ ื ืชืชื™ืš ืœืขืžื•ื“ ื‘ืจื–ืœ ื•ืœื—ื•ืžืช ื ื—ืฉืช (ืœืขื™ืœ ื) ื•ืฉืœื• ื—ื–ืง ืžืฉืœื”ื ื›ื™ ื ื‘ื•ื›ื“ื ืฆืจ ืžืฆืคื•ืŸ ื™ื‘ื ื›ื“ื‘ืจื™ื• ืขืœื™ื”ื: ื”ื™ืจื•ืข. ื”ื™ืจื•ืฆืฅ ื‘ืจื–ืœ ืฉืœื”ื ืืช ืฉืœืš, ื“"ื ื”ื™ืจื•ืฆืฅ ืคืจืขื” ื”ื‘ื ื‘ืขื–ืจืชื›ื ืฉื”ื•ื ืงืฉื” ื›ื‘ืจื–ืœ ืืช ื ื‘ื•ื›ื“ื ืฆืจ ืฉื”ื•ื ื‘ืจื–ืœ ื”ื‘ื ืžืฆืคื•ืŸ ื•ื ื—ืฉืช ื•ืชืจื’ื•ื ื™ื•ื ืชืŸ ื ื•ื˜ื” ืœืฆื“ ื–ื”:
Will iron break iron from the north I say that iron that comes from the north is harder than other iron, and this is its interpretation: They were compared to iron (above 6:28), "Going tale bearing like copper and iron." And concerning Jeremiah it is stated (above 1:18): "I have made you... into an iron pillar and into copper walls," and his is stronger than theirs, for Nebuchadnezzar will come upon them according to his words. Willโ€ฆbreak Will their iron break yours? Another explanation: Will Pharaoh who comes in your aid, who is as hard as iron, break Nebuchadnezzar, who is iron that comes from the north and copper? Targum Jonathan is inclined toward this direction.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื’ ยท Verse 13

Hebrew:

ื—ึตื™ืœึฐืšึธึง ื•ึฐืื•ึนืฆึฐืจื•ึนืชึถึ›ื™ืšึธ ืœึธื‘ึทึฅื– ืึถืชึผึตึ–ืŸ ืœึนึฃื ื‘ึดืžึฐื—ึดึ‘ื™ืจ ื•ึผื‘ึฐื›ื‡ืœึพื—ึทื˜ึผึนืื•ืชึถึ–ื™ืšึธ ื•ึผื‘ึฐื›ื‡ืœึพื’ึผึฐื‘ื•ึผืœึถึฝื™ืšึธืƒ

English:

I will hand over your wealth and your treasures As a spoil, free of charge, Because of all your sins throughout your territory.

Your wealth and your treasures I will give as spoil, lo vimchir, without price. Radak explains the phrase to mean that the plunderers will be so many that nothing will be sold or valued at all - each man will simply seize for himself - and Metzudat David adds that the conqueror will not spare the land in exchange for the treasure he takes, since he takes it as plunder rather than as payment. Rashi notes that it is Israel being addressed here, and that the closing words ubechol gevulecha mean that there was no place within your borders where you did not sin, since you set up idols in all of them.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื—ื™ืœืš. ืœ' ืžืžื•ืŸ: ื•ืื•ืฆืจื•ืชื™ืš ืœื™ืฉืจืืœ ื”ื•ื ืื•ืžืจ: ื•ื‘ื›ืœ ื—ื˜ืืชื™ืš. ื•ืœืžืขืŸ ื›ืœ ื—ื˜ืืชื™ืš ืชื”ื™ ื–ืืช ืœืš: ื•ื‘ื›ืœ ื’ื‘ื•ืœื™ืš. ืืฉืจ ื”ืขืžื“ืช ืืœื™ืœื™ื ื‘ื›ื•ืœืŸ:
Your wealth An expression of money. and your treasures He is addressing Israel. and for all your sins And because of all your sins, this will befall you. and throughout all your boundaries For you erected idols in all of them.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื“ ยท Verse 14

Hebrew:

ื•ึฐื”ึทึฝืขึฒื‘ึทืจึฐืชึผึดื™ึ™ ืึถืชึพืึนึฃื™ึฐื‘ึถึ”ื™ืšึธ ื‘ึผึฐืึถึ–ืจึถืฅ ืœึนึฃื ื™ึธื“ึธึ‘ืขึฐืชึผึธ ื›ึผึดื™ึพืึตึ›ืฉื ืงึธื“ึฐื—ึธึฅื” ื‘ึฐืึทืคึผึดึ–ื™ ืขึฒืœึตื™ื›ึถึฅื ืชึผื•ึผืงึธึฝื“ืƒย {ืก} ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย 

English:

And I will bring your enemies By way of a land you have not known. For a fire has flared in My wrath, It blazes against you.

And I will bring your enemies by way of a land you have not known, for a fire has kindled in My anger and burns against you. Metzudat David reads the verb as moving Yirmiyahu's people out of their own land to go with their enemies into a land unknown to them from of old, and takes the fire as the outpouring of wrath upon them. Radak notes the textual question, that the careful manuscripts read v'ha'avarti with a resh, while Yonatan's Aramaic appears to reflect v'ha'avadti with a dalet, meaning you shall be enslaved to your enemies - and that the parallel passage in chapter 17 does read with a dalet.

ืคืกื•ืง ื˜ืดื• ยท Verse 15

Hebrew:

ืึทืชึผึธึงื” ื™ึธื“ึทึฃืขึฐืชึผึธ ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ—ื” ื–ื‡ื›ึฐืจึตึคื ึดื™ ื•ึผืคื‡ืงึฐื“ึตึ™ื ึดื™ึ™ ื•ึฐื”ึดื ึผึธึคืงึถื ืœึดื™ึ™ ืžึตืจึนึฃื“ึฐืคึทึ”ื™ ืึทืœึพืœึฐืึถึฅืจึถืšึฐ ืึทืคึผึฐืšึธึ– ืชึผึดืงึผึธื—ึตึ‘ื ึดื™ ื“ึผึทึ•ืข ืฉื‚ึฐืึตืชึดึฅื™ ืขึธืœึถึ–ื™ืšึธ ื—ึถืจึฐืคึผึธึฝื”ืƒ

English:

O ETERNAL One, you knowโ€” Remember me and take thought of me, Avenge me on those who persecute me; Do not yield to Your patience, Do not let me perish! Consider how I have borne insult On Your account.

Atah yadata, You know - remember me and visit me and avenge me of my persecutors. Metzudat David supplies the object of yadata from the end of chapter 11, the evil that the men of Anatot are doing to him. The middle clause is the strangest: al l'erech apecha tikacheni, which Rashi renders after the Targum as lo titen archa l'ulvani, do not grant a reprieve to my humiliation - do not take up my case only to leave it lying in Your longsuffering, but hurry and avenge me - while Radak reads it more darkly still, that if You mean to be patient with them then at least do not take me, do not let me die, so that I may live to see Your vengeance. And da se'eiti alecha cherpah, which Metzudat David glosses as the reproach he bears for prophesying in Your name, Radak turns outward into a demand: show them that You knew and that it was not hidden from You.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืืœ ืœืืจืš ืืคืš ืชืงื—ื ื™. ืชืจื’ื•ื ื™ื•ื ืชืŸ ืœื ืชืชืŸ ืืจื›ื ืœืขื•ืœื‘ื ื™ ืืœ ืชืงื— ืืช ืจื™ื‘ื™ ืœื”ื ื™ื—ื• ืœืืจืš ืืคืš ืืœื ืžื”ืจ ื•ื”ื ืงื ืœื™: ืฉืืชื™. ื›ืžื• ืกื‘ืœืชื™: ืขืœื™ืš. ื‘ืฉื‘ื™ืœืš:
Take me not to Your long suffering Jonathan renders. Do not grant a reprieve for my humiliation. Do not take my cause to leave it for Your long suffering, but hasten and avenge me. I bore like ืกึธื‘ึทืœึฐืชึผึดื™ bore. for Your sake for You.

ืคืกื•ืง ื˜ืดื– ยท Verse 16

Hebrew:

ื ึดืžึฐืฆึฐืึคื•ึผ ื“ึฐื‘ึธืจึถึ™ื™ืšึธึ™ ื•ึธืึนึฃื›ึฐืœึตึ”ื ื•ึทื™ึฐื”ึดึคื™ (ื“ื‘ืจื™ืš) [ื“ึฐื‘ึธึฝืจึฐืšึธึ™] ืœึดึ”ื™ ืœึฐืฉื‚ึธืฉื‚ึ–ื•ึนืŸ ื•ึผืœึฐืฉื‚ึดืžึฐื—ึทึฃืช ืœึฐื‘ึธื‘ึดึ‘ื™ ื›ึผึดึฝื™ึพื ึดืงึฐืจึธึคื ืฉืึดืžึฐืšึธึ™ ืขึธืœึทึ”ื™ ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ–ื” ืึฑืœึนื”ึตึฅื™ ืฆึฐื‘ึธืึฝื•ึนืชืƒย {ืก} ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย 

English:

When Your words were offered, I devoured them; Your word brought me the delight and joy Of knowing that Your name is attached to me, O ETERNAL One, God of Hosts.

Nimtze'u devarecha va'ochlem - Your words were found and I ate them, and Your word was to me the joy and rejoicing of my heart, for Your name is called upon me. Radak explains the eating plainly, that when the words were found to him in prophecy he received them willingly the way a person eats food that is sweet to him, and identifies what the joy consisted of: that they would say of him, a prophet of Hashem, while the other prophets are called prophets of the Ba'al. Metzudat David says the same, that his gladness was in the shefa of prophecy descending upon him. Rashi then sets a time-stamp on the verse that breaks it open - latavah mitechilah, eagerly, at the beginning, and they were a joy to me ki dimiti sheyishme'u elai atah, for I imagined that now they would listen to me. The joy is in the past tense and is explained as a misunderstanding.
โ–ถCommentaries (2)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื ืžืฆืื• ื“ื‘ืจื™ืš ื•ืื•ื›ืœื. ืœืชืื•ื” ืžืชื—ืœื” ื•ื”ื™ื• ืœืฉืฉื•ืŸ ื›ื™ ื“ืžื™ืชื™ ืฉื™ืฉืžืขื• ืืœื™ ืขืชื”:
Your words were found and I ate them eagerly at the beginning, and they were a joy for me, for I thought that now they would listen to me.
ืจื“ืดืงRadak
ื ืžืฆืื•. ื›ืฉื ืžืฆืื• ืœื™ ื“ื‘ืจื™ืš ื‘ื ื‘ื•ืื” ืงื‘ืœืชื™ื ื‘ืจืฆื•ืŸ ื›ืžื• ืฉืื•ื›ืœ ืื“ื ื”ื“ื‘ืจ ื”ืขืจื‘ ืœื• ืœืคื™ื›ืš ืืžืจ ื•ืื›ืœื: ื›ื™ ื ืงืจื ืฉืžืš ืขืœื™. ื‘ื–ื” ืื ื™ ืฉืžื— ืžืื“ ืฉื™ืืžืจื• ืขืœื™ ื ื‘ื™ื ื”ืฉื ื•ืฉืืจ ื”ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื™ืงืจืื• ื ื‘ื™ืื™ ื”ื‘ืขืœ: ื•ื™ื”ื™ ื“ื‘ืจื™ืš. ื›ืชื•ื‘ ื‘ื™ื•"ื“ ื•ืงืจื™ ื“ื‘ืจืš ื‘ืœื ื™ื•"ื“ ืœืฉื•ืŸ ื™ื—ื™ื“ ื›ืžื• ืฉืืžืจ ื•ื™ื”ื™ ื•ื”ื›ืชื•ื‘ ื“ืจืš ืคืจื˜ ื•ื”ืงืจื™ ื“ืจืš ื›ืœืœ:
Found. When your words in my prophecy were found to accept you as willingly as a human being, this evening he told him and ate them: 2 Because your name is called Ali. In this I am very happy to be told by the Prophet of the Name and the other Prophets will read the Prophets of the Baal: 3 And so be your words. Write in the text and read your speech without a single language, as he said, and it should be written in detail and read in general:

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื– ยท Verse 17

Hebrew:

ืœึนืึพื™ึธืฉืึทึฅื‘ึฐืชึผึดื™ ื‘ึฐืกื•ึนื“ึพืžึฐืฉื‚ึทื—ึฒืงึดึ–ื™ื ื•ึธืึถืขึฐืœึนึ‘ื– ืžึดืคึผึฐื ึตึคื™ ื™ึธึฝื“ึฐืšึธึ™ ื‘ึผึธื“ึธึฃื“ ื™ึธืฉืึทึ”ื‘ึฐืชึผึดื™ ื›ึผึดื™ึพื–ึทึ–ืขึทื ืžึดืœึผึตืืชึธึฝื ึดื™ืƒ

English:

I have not sat in the company of revelers And made merry! I have sat lonely because of Your hand upon me, For You have filled me with gloom.

This is the cost of verse 16: I did not sit in the circle of revelers and make merry; because of Your hand I sat alone, for You filled me with indignation. Rashi reads mipnei yadecha as the prophecy that came to him from You, and describes him sitting solitary and stunned in mourning, because You filled me with a prophecy of fury about the destruction of Your house. Radak draws the contrast that organizes the verse: Your word was the gladness of my heart, and by levavi he means the gladness of the intellect, but the other gladness, the gladness of the body, of sitting in their company while they laugh and laughing with them - that he never had, not even their companionship, for he sat alone, secluded in his house. Radak offers a second reading of yadecha as Your blow rather than Your prophecy, the beatings and contempt that were their answer to his words.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืžืคื ื™ ื™ื“ืš. ืžืคื ื™ ื ื‘ื•ืื” ื”ื‘ืื” ืœื™ ืžืืชืš: ื™ืฉื‘ืชื™. ื™ื—ื™ื“ื™ ื•ืžืฉืชื•ืžื ื‘ืื‘ื™ืœื•ืช ื›ื™ ื ื‘ื•ืืช ื–ืขื ืžืœืืชื ื™ ื‘ื—ื•ืจื‘ืŸ ื‘ื™ืชืš:
because of Your hand Because of the prophecy that came to me from You. I sat alone and bewildered by mourning, for You filled me with a prophecy of fury concerning the destruction of Your House.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื— ยท Verse 18

Hebrew:

ืœึธึฃืžึผึธื” ื”ึธื™ึธึคื” ื›ึฐืึตื‘ึดื™ึ™ ื ึถึ”ืฆึทื— ื•ึผืžึทื›ึผึธืชึดึ–ื™ ืึฒื ื•ึผืฉืึธึ‘ื” ืžึตึฝืึฒื ึธื”ึ™ ื”ึตืจึธืคึตึ”ื ื”ึธื™ึจื•ึน ืชึดื”ึฐื™ึถึฅื” ืœึดื™ึ™ ื›ึผึฐืžึฃื•ึน ืึทื›ึฐื–ึธึ”ื‘ ืžึทึ–ื™ึดื ืœึนึฅื ื ึถืึฑืžึธึฝื ื•ึผืƒย {ืก} ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย 

English:

Why must my pain be endless, My wound incurable, Resistant to healing? You have been to me like a spring that fails, Like waters that cannot be relied on.

Here a prophet says what no prophet should be able to say. Lamah hayah che'evi netzach, why is my pain perpetual and my wound anushah, which Rashi takes as mortally sick, on the model of vayei'anash said of the child of Bat Sheva. Radak hears netzach as unending and daily, notes that a wound me'anah herafei, refusing to be healed, is the language of poetry since a wound has no will of its own, and lets the real question surface - mah avon yesh bi, what sin is there in me? Then the accusation: hayo tihyeh li k'mo achzav, will You be to me as a deceitful brook, as waters that fail? Rashi glosses achzav as a spring that stops, and says it is like a man whose confidence has been cut off from him, for You leave me to suffer at their hands; Metzudat David reads the same, that You withdrew the help and rescue from those who rise against me. Radak names the target exactly - the comparison is aimed at God because of what He promised at the start, l'ir mivtzar ul'amud barzel ulchomot nechoshet; Yirmiyahu had assumed the war foretold in chapter 1 would have an end, and when it did not, he complained.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืื ื•ืฉื”. ื—ื•ืœื” ื›ืžื• ื•ื™ืื ืฉ ื•ื™ื—ืœื” ื‘ื‘ื ื” ืฉืœ ื‘ืช ืฉื‘ืข: ื”ื™ื• ืชื”ื™ื” ืœื™. ืืชื” ื”ื•ื•ื” ืœื™ ื›ืžื• ืื›ื–ื‘. ื›ืื“ื ืฉืžื‘ื˜ื—ื• ื ืคืกืง ืžืžื ื• ืฉืืชื” ืžื ื™ื—ื ื™ ืœื”ืฆื˜ืขืจ ื‘ื™ื“ื, ืื›ื–ื‘ ืžืงื•ืจ ืคื•ืกืง ืคื™ื™ืœื™ื™ื "ืฅ ื‘ืœืขื–: ืžื™ื ืœื ื ืืžื ื•. ืœืกืžื•ืš ืขืœื™ื”ื:
grievous sick. Comp. (II Sam. 12:15) "And he became mortally ill (ื•ึทื™ึผึตืึธื ึนึทืฉ)." mentioned concerning Bath-sheba's son. You are to me Heb. ื”ึธื™ื•ึน ืชึดื”ึฐื™ึถื”. as a failing spring Like a man whose trust has been cut off from him, for you allow me to suffer at their hands. ืึทื›ึฐื–ึธื‘ is a spring that stops (faylayne in O. F:), failing. water that is not faithful to rely upon it.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื˜ ยท Verse 19

Hebrew:

ืœึธื›ึตึžืŸ ื›ึผึนื”ึพืึธืžึทึฃืจ ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ—ื” ืึดืึพืชึผึธืฉืึคื•ึผื‘ ื•ึทืึฒืฉืึดึฝื™ื‘ึฐืšึธึ™ ืœึฐืคึธื ึทึฃื™ ืชึผึทืขึฒืžึนึ”ื“ ื•ึฐืึดืึพืชึผื•ึนืฆึดึฅื™ื ื™ึธืงึธึ›ืจ ืžึดื–ึผื•ึนืœึตึ–ืœ ื›ึผึฐืคึดึฃื™ ืชึดึฝื”ึฐื™ึถึ‘ื” ื™ึธืฉืึปึคื‘ื•ึผ ื”ึตึ™ืžึผึธื”ึ™ ืึตืœึถึ”ื™ืšึธ ื•ึฐืึทืชึผึธึ–ื” ืœึนืึพืชึธืฉืึฅื•ึผื‘ ืึฒืœึตื™ื”ึถึฝืืƒ

English:

Assuredly, thus said GOD: If you turn back, I shall take you back And you shall stand before Me; If you produce what is noble Out of the worthless, You shall be My spokesman. They shall come back to you, Not you to them.

The answer is not a rebuke but a re-commissioning. Radak hears God reply to the accusation head on: you spoke against Me words that were not right when you said hayo tihyeh li k'mo achzav, and in this you sinned - but if you return in teshuvah and regret what you said, I will bring you back and forgive you and you will stand before Me as at first; and he notes that standing before Hashem, the same amidah as in verse 1, means prayer and thanksgiving and the receiving of prophecy, an idiom used only of a prophet. Rashi and Metzudat David read im tashuv as addressed through Yirmiyahu to Israel - if you bring them back, I will bring them back through you - and both explain totzi yakar mizolel as extracting a fit man from a wicked one by turning him to repentance. Rashi's gloss on k'fi tihyeh is the boldest line in the commentaries here: she'ani gozer gezerah v'atah mevatlah, that I decree a decree and you annul it. Radak reads the closing warning pastorally - labor to bring them to you, but guard yourself against being led over to them by the abundance of their arguments.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืœื›ืŸ. ื‘ืขื‘ื•ืจ ืฉืื ื™ ืกื•ื‘ืœ ื”ืฆืจื•ืช ื”ืืœื”: ื›ื” ืืžืจ ื”'. ืœื™: ืื ืชืฉื•ื‘. ืืชื” ื™ืฉืจืืœ ืข"ื™ ื•ืืฉื™ื‘ืš ืื ื™ ืืœื™ื• ืืžืจ ืœื™ ืœืคื ื™ ืชืขืžื•ื“: ื•ืื ืชื•ืฆื™ื ื™ืงืจ ืžื–ื•ืœืœ. ืื ืชื•ืฆื™ื ืื“ื ื”ื’ื•ืŸ ืžืื“ื ืจืฉืข ืฉืชื—ื–ื™ืจื ื• ืœืžื•ื˜ื‘: ื›ืคื™ ืชื”ื™ื”. ืฉืื ื™ ื’ื•ื–ืจ ื’ื–ื™ืจื” ื•ืืชื” ืžื‘ื˜ืœื”: ื™ืฉื•ื‘ื• ื”ืžื” ืืœื™ืš ื•ืืชื” ืœื ืชืฉื•ื‘ ืืœื™ื”ื. ื™ืชื•ื‘ื•ืŸ ืื™ื ื•ืŸ ืœืคืชื’ืžืš ื•ืืช ืœื ืชืชื•ื‘ ืœืžื˜ืขื™ ื‘ืชืจื™ื”ื•ืŸ:
Therefore Because I suffer from these troubles. so said the Lord to me. If you return You, Israel, through me, and I will return you to Him, He said to Me, "You will stand before Me." and if you take precious out of the vile If you take a pious man from a wicked man, i.e., if you bring him to repentance. You shall be as my mouth For I make a decree and you annul it. Let them return to you, but you shall not return to them Let them return to your word, but you shall not return to stray after them.

ืคืกื•ืง ื›ืณ ยท Verse 20

Hebrew:

ื•ึผื ึฐืชึทืชึผึดึœื™ืšึธ ืœึธืขึธึฃื ื”ึทื–ึผึถึ—ื” ืœึฐื—ื•ึนืžึทึคืช ื ึฐื—ึนึ™ืฉืึถืชึ™ ื‘ึผึฐืฆื•ึผืจึธึ”ื” ื•ึฐื ึดืœึฐื—ึฒืžึฅื•ึผ ืึตืœึถึ–ื™ืšึธ ื•ึฐืœึนืึพื™ึฃื•ึผื›ึฐืœื•ึผ ืœึธึ‘ืšึฐ ื›ึผึดึฝื™ึพืึดืชึผึฐืšึธึฅ ืึฒื ึดึ›ื™ ืœึฐื”ื•ึนืฉืึดื™ืขึฒืšึธึฅ ื•ึผืœึฐื”ึทืฆึผึดื™ืœึถึ–ืšึธ ื ึฐืึปืึพื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึฝื”ืƒ

English:

Against this people I will make you As a fortified wall of bronze: They will attack you, But they shall not overcome you, For I am with you to deliver and save you โ€”declares GOD.

I will make you to this people a fortified wall of bronze; they shall fight against you but shall not prevail, for I am with you to save and deliver you - the promise of chapter 1 renewed after he has broken. Radak reads the verse as God's direct rebuttal of achzav: I will not be like a man who deceives, but as I said to you at the beginning, so I will do. He then corrects Yirmiyahu's reading of the original call with great care - I never said their war against you would last only a season; you did not understand My words well. What was promised is lo yuchlu lach lahamitecha, that they will not be able to kill you, not that they will not fight; they will fight with words and blows and contempt for as long as you rebuke them, and all that labor you will bear in order to bring them back to Me. And Radak adds the arithmetic of prophetic hope: even if you do not bring all of them back, it is impossible that you will not bring back some.

ืคืกื•ืง ื›ืดื ยท Verse 21

Hebrew:

ื•ึฐื”ึดืฆึผึทืœึฐืชึผึดึ–ื™ืšึธ ืžึดื™ึผึทึฃื“ ืจึธืขึดึ‘ื™ื ื•ึผืคึฐื“ึดืชึดึ–ื™ืšึธ ืžึดื›ึผึทึฅืฃ ืขึธืจึดืฆึดึฝื™ืืƒย {ืก} ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย 

English:

I will save you from the hands of the wicked And rescue you from the clutches of the violent.

The chapter closes with the promise of rescue from the hands of the wicked and the grasp of the ruthless. Metzudat David names the ra'im without hesitation - they are the men of Anatot, Yirmiyahu's own townsmen and kin from chapter 11 - and reads aritzim as those stronger than he in sheer force of arm, the second phrase doubling the first for emphasis. Radak adds simply that they are the ones who want to kill him. The chapter that began with shalach me'al panai, send them from My presence, ends with lefanai ta'amod and a guarantee of survival: nothing has been promised about the people, and everything about the prophet.

โ† Jeremiah 14 | Jeremiah 16 โ†’

Back to Jeremiah | Back to Nach Yomi