Skip to main contentSkip to Content

Jeremiah 13

ื™ืจืžื™ื”ื• ืคืจืง ื™ืดื’

Section: ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ยท ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ืื—ืจื•ื ื™ื | Book: Jeremiah | Chapter: 13 of 52 | Day: 226 of 742

Date: September 25, 2026


ืงืœืื•ื“ ืขืœ ื”ื ืดืš

Chapter 13 is where Yirmiyahuโ€™s prophecy stops being spoken and starts being worn. Until now the book has worked by word and vision - the almond rod, the seething pot, the covenant read aloud in the streets of Yerushalayim. Here, for the first time, the prophetโ€™s own body becomes the text. Haloch vโ€™kanita lโ€™cha ezor pishtim vโ€™samto al motneicha uvamayim lo tโ€™viehu: go buy yourself a linen waistcloth, put it on your loins, and do not bring it into water. Rashi and Metzudat David read that last clause with the same practical cruelty - do not wash it when it grows thick with sweat, so that it will rot the faster. The ezor is an undergarment, the innermost thing a man wears, the one article of clothing that touches him and nothing else. Yirmiyahu is told to buy a new one, wear it until it is filthy, then carry it away and bury it in a cleft of the rock at Perat, and then, mikeitz yamim rabim, after many days, to go back and dig it up. What he finds is the chapterโ€™s first and bleakest verdict: vโ€™hineh nishchat haโ€™ezor lo yitzlach lakol - the waistcloth was ruined, it was not good for anything. Rashi glosses lo yitzlach lakol in four words, eino raโ€™ui lโ€™chlum, it is not fit for a thing, and Radak draws the grammatical parallel to kol melachah lo taโ€™aseh - not merely unsuited to some purposes but to any purpose whatsoever. A ruined garment has no residual value. You cannot cut it down, repurpose it, or sell it for rags. That total uselessness is the point of the sign, and it is the harshest thing said about Yehudah in the book so far.

Whether any of this happened is a question the commentators raise with admirable honesty, and it deserves to be stated plainly rather than smoothed over. Radak opens his comment on verse 1 by laying out both options: efshar shehayah mamash, it is possible that the matter of the ezor was literal and Yirmiyahu actually did what God commanded him - but the Rambam, whom Radak calls hechacham hagadol moreh tzedek, wrote that this entire act took place in a prophetic dream. The difficulty that drives the question is geographic. If Perat is the Euphrates, the prophet walked hundreds of miles to bury a belt and hundreds of miles back to retrieve it, twice, on an errand whose only purpose was to produce a sermon illustration. Metzudat David simply identifies pโ€™ratah as lโ€™nahar Pโ€™rat, to the Euphrates river, without flinching at the distance. Radak, for his part, explains why the Euphrates and not somewhere closer: because it is the boundary of Eretz Yisrael, meaning that when they go out from the land of Israel to Bavel their pride will be ruined. The destination is not incidental; it is the map of the exile drawn in advance. The garment is buried where the people will be buried. Radak also confesses, with a candor rare in commentary, that the clause uvamayim lo tโ€™viehu defeats him - lo eida bo taam adayin, I do not yet know its reason - and then argues against Rashiโ€™s reading on grounds of language: if the point were simply that he should not launder it, Scripture should have said lo techabsโ€™hu. That unresolved detail is worth sitting with. A sign act is not an allegory in which every element decodes neatly. Something in it resists, the way the real world resists, and the honest reader lets it resist. The interpretation, when it comes in verses 9 through 11, turns the sign inside out. Kachah ashchit et gโ€™on Yehudah vโ€™et gโ€™on Yerushalayim harav - so will I ruin the pride of Yehudah and the great pride of Yerushalayim. Rashi is careful about the referent: gโ€™onam yihyeh kaโ€™ezor hazeh hanirkav, their pride will be like this rotted belt, and Radak makes the same identification grammatically, that vโ€™yehi kaโ€™ezor refers back to the gโ€™on of the preceding verse. What rots is not the people but their self-regard. And then the extraordinary positive statement buried inside the threat: ki kaโ€™asher yidbak haโ€™ezor el motnei ish, ken hidbakti elai et kol beit Yisrael vโ€™et kol beit Yehudah - as a waistcloth clings to a manโ€™s loins, so I made the whole house of Israel and the whole house of Yehudah cling to Me, lihyot li lโ€™am ulโ€™shem vโ€™litโ€™hilah ulโ€™tifโ€™aret, to be for Me a people, and a name, and a praise, and a glory. Metzudat David reads that fourfold purpose as the good name that was to accrue to them, and reads the closing vโ€™lo shameu as the hinge - they did not listen, and therefore they will be ruined like this waistcloth. The metaphor has been chosen with terrible precision. An ezor is not an ornament worn at a distance; it is the one garment pressed against the skin, and the image is of an intimacy so close that there is no air between God and Israel. But the same closeness is what makes the ruin possible. The belt rotted because it was worn, because it absorbed sweat, because it was never washed. Nothing that stays at a distance decays that way. Yehudahโ€™s corruption is not the corruption of a stranger; it is the specific rot of the thing held closest.

The second sign, in verses 12 through 14, needs no journey at all, only a proverb. Kol nevel yimalei yayin - every jar is filled with wine. Rashi identifies the nevel as an earthenware vessel made for holding wine, and the peopleโ€™s response is an eye-roll: hayadoa lo neda, do we not already know that every jar gets filled with wine? Radak explains why this banality is a prophecy by finding two metaphors inside the single image. First, as a jar is filled with wine until the wine soaks into its very walls, so they will be filled with shikaron, drunkenness, from every side - and the drunkenness is a figure for the sheer density of troubles, because just as the drunk has no understanding and does not know what to do, so one whom troubles have overwhelmed is stunned and bewildered and does not know what to do. Second, and worse, when a man strikes one jar against another both shatter, which is why Scripture uses the verb of nipputz with jars - and so there will be strife among them in their troubles, fathers against sons, vโ€™nipatztim ish el achiv, and they will be ruined both by their enemies and by themselves. Metzudat David names the victims precisely: the kings who sit for David on his throne, and hakohanim, the priests of the Baal, and haneviโ€™im, the false prophets. The oracle fills the whole hierarchy with stupor and then smashes it against itself, and Godโ€™s refusal is unqualified: lo echmol vโ€™lo achus vโ€™lo arachem mehashchitam. Rashiโ€™s image for nipatztim is of striking one vessel against another until they break into small fragments - the same verb Tehillim uses for a potterโ€™s vessel. A jar, unlike a belt, cannot even be said to rot. It simply ceases to be a jar.

And then, in verses 15 through 17, the oracle breaks open and the prophetโ€™s own voice comes through, and these three verses are why this chapter is one of the most humanly bearable in the book. Shimu vโ€™haโ€™azinu al tigbahu ki Hashem diber: hear and give ear, do not be proud, for the Lord has spoken. Radak hears in al tigbahu a very specific arrogance - do not think that instruction and wisdom are already yours and that you have no need to hear Godโ€™s discipline through His prophets. Then tenu laHashem Eloheichem kavod bโ€™terem yachshich, give glory to the Lord your God before it grows dark, before your feet stumble on harei nashef, the mountains of gloom - which Rashi reads as harei choshech, the dark mountains on which they will walk into exile. And the unbearable reversal: vโ€™kivitem lโ€™or vโ€™samah lโ€™tzalmavet, you will hope for light and He will set it to the shadow of death. Radakโ€™s reading sharpens it into politics: the light they are hoping for is Egypt, the alliance that will save them, and it is precisely that hope that will be turned into darkness. Then the prophet stops speaking for God and speaks for himself. Vโ€™im lo tishmauha, bamistarim tivkeh nafshi mipnei gevah, vโ€™damoa tidma vโ€™teirad eini dimah, ki nishbah eder Hashem. If you will not hear it, my soul will weep in secret places because of your pride, and my eye will run down with tears, because the flock of the Lord is taken captive. Radak divides the weeping with great delicacy: nafshi tivkeh bamistarim, my soul weeps in hiding, which he identifies as inward dread, vโ€™eini tidma bโ€™galui, and my eye sheds tears openly. The hidden grief and the public tears are two different acts. Rashi reads mipnei gevah in two ways - because of your greatness that is to be annulled, or because of the pride of the kingdom of Heaven that will be handed over to the idols of the Kasdim - and Metzudat David takes it as the pride still in them, their refusal to bend. Metzudat David also catches the tense of the thing: tivkeh nafshi bamistarim, in the chambers of the body, ki roโ€™eh ani haraโ€™ah hamotzeit etchem, because I see the evil that is finding you. The prophet is weeping for something that has not happened yet. That is the whole condition of his life. From verse 18 the chapter turns to the throne and never lifts its eyes again. Emor lamelech vโ€™lagโ€™virah hashpilu shevu - say to the king and the queen mother, sit low, ki yarad marโ€™ashoteichem ateret tifโ€™artchem, for the crown of your glory has come down from your heads. Rashi names them: Yehoyachin and his mother, pointing to the verse in Melachim where Yehoyachin came out to Nevuchadnetzar, he and his mother and his servants, and all of them were led into exile. Radak adds the detail that completes the humiliation - even in exile they were not treated as royalty, for Yehoyachin was put in prison like any commoner. Metzudat David reads hashpilu shevu literally: sit in a low place, bent to the ground, and do not sit on thrones. Then the land itself closes: arei hanegev sugru vโ€™ein poteach, the cities of the south are shut and there is none to open. Metzudat David explains the bleak logic - they are ruined, and therefore shut, and there is no one to open them, for since no one is there, who would open the city gates? The commentators divide over hoglat shโ€™lomim: Metzudat David reads it as galut shโ€™leimah, a complete exile, contrasting Yehoyachinโ€™s deportation which left many of the princes and the common people behind with Tzidkiyahuโ€™s, in which all of them would go; Rashi offers both that Yehoyachin went out peaceably rather than fighting, and, following the Targum, that shโ€™lomim means recompense, the full payment of their sins received. Then the address sharpens into interrogation. Seu eineichem urโ€™u habaโ€™im mitzafon - lift your eyes and see those coming from the north - ayeh haโ€™eder nitan lach, tzon tifโ€™artech? Where is the flock that was given you, the sheep of your glory? Metzudat David puts the question to the king and the queen mother directly: where is the people of Yehudah that was given you to be their shepherd and king? A shepherd is asked to account for his flock, and the accounting is the verdict. Then mah tomri ki yifkod alayich - what will you say when He visits upon you? - and the answer is that the punishment was self-administered. Vโ€™at limadt otam alayich alufim lโ€™rosh, you yourself taught them to be chiefs over you. Rashi reads it as the embassies sent to the Kasdim to fetch their idols, and alternatively as Chizkiyahu showing the envoys of Merodach Baladan his entire treasure house; Metzudat David follows the second reading and draws out its consequence, that the display of the treasury inflamed Bavelโ€™s appetite and set them coming back again and again to take it; Radak reads the verb differently again, pointing to Achaz sending to the king of Ashur the words avdecha uvincha ani, I am your servant and your son, come up and save me. On every reading the indictment is the same: the empire that is coming to destroy you is the empire you invited in. And then halo chavalim yochezuch kโ€™mo eshet leidah, will not pangs seize you like a woman in childbirth - an image Radak notes is reversed here, since the order of things is overturned.

Verse 23 is the verse this chapter is remembered for, and it deserves to be read as the theological problem it is. Im yahafoch Kushi oro vโ€™namer chavarburotav, gam atem tuchlu lโ€™heitiv limudei hareโ€™a - can a Kushi change his skin, or a leopard his spots? So can you do good, who are schooled in evil. Rashi explains chavarburotav as the leopardโ€™s markings and says flatly that it is impossible for them to change. Radak presses the logic harder: blackness in the Kushi is a natural property, not an accident, and will never depart from him, and so too the leopardโ€™s spots - so wickedness cannot depart from you, as though it were natural in you, kol kach lamadtem vโ€™hirgaltem atzmechem bโ€™maaseh hara ad sheshav etzlechem davar tivโ€™i, so thoroughly have you learned and habituated yourselves to evil action that it has become for you a natural thing. The word limudei carries the whole argument: Radak glosses it as murgal, habituated. Nothing here is congenital. What began as practice has hardened into something that behaves like nature, and that is a description of habit, not of creation. Metzudat David is the one who refuses to let the verse close the door. After giving the same reading - you cannot do good because of the evil habit you have become accustomed to, until it became like a natural thing in you - he adds the decisive qualification: vโ€™hu inyan guzma vโ€™haflagah, this is a matter of hyperbole and overstatement, meaning bโ€™koshi rav tishtanu mimaaseichem, that only with great difficulty will you change from your deeds. That is not a small gloss. It is the difference between a verse that forecloses teshuvah and a verse that measures how expensive teshuvah has become. Yirmiyahu is not preaching determinism; he is describing the price of a habit held so long that changing it will feel like changing the color of oneโ€™s skin. Difficult is not impossible. But a prophet who says difficult to a people who believe themselves fine has said the more frightening thing.

The chapter ends in the starkest imagery in the book, and the right response to it is gravity rather than commentary. Vaโ€™afitzem kโ€™kash over lโ€™ruach midbar - I will scatter them like chaff passing before the desert wind, which Metzudat David explains is a wind with nothing standing in its way to stop it. Zeh goralech mโ€™nat midayich meโ€™iti, this is your lot, the portion of your measures from Me; Rashi reduces it to three words, midah kโ€™neged midah, measure for measure, and Metzudat David completes the equation - because you forgot Me and trusted in Egypt, which is falsehood, therefore I too will forget you. Radak spells out the symmetry: in the measure you measured, I measured to you; you turned Me the neck and not the face, and I hid My face from you. Then the shaming. Vโ€™gam ani chasafti shulayich al panayich vโ€™nirโ€™ah kโ€™lonech - I too have stripped your skirts over your face, and your disgrace is seen. The image has already appeared at verse 22, where nigโ€™lu shulayich nechmesu akevayich was said, and both Rashi and Metzudat David read it there as the public humiliation of a woman taken in adultery, her garment turned up from below. Radakโ€™s reading lifts it out of the physical entirely: shulei habeged are the lower parts, and when they are turned up the wearer is exposed - and this is a mashal for kโ€™neset Yisrael, who was nistaret, sheltered under the wings of God and honored in her own land, and now she is exiled and her covering is removed from her and her shame is uncovered before every eye in the lands of strangers. That is what the image means. It is the language of exposure, of a nation stripped of the protection that made it dignified and paraded in front of the world; Radakโ€™s single word nistaret is the whole of what was lost. The closing verse names the charge - niโ€™ufayich umitzhalotayich zimat zโ€™nutech, your adulteries and your neighings and the lewdness of your harlotry - and Radak states at the outset what should govern the reading of all of it: kvar peirashnu ki kol inyan haniโ€™uf hu mashal laโ€™avodah zarah, we have already explained that the whole matter of adultery is a figure for idolatry. Rashi hears the mitzhalot as the neighing of lustful horses; Metzudat David reads them as raised voices of frivolous joy, and al gโ€™vaot basadeh as the hilltop shrines where the shikutzim stood. Then the last line, and it is a question, not a sentence: oy lach Yerushalayim lo titโ€™hari, acharei matai od. Metzudat David reads lo titโ€™hari as a refusal rather than an incapacity - you do not want to become pure after you have been defiled, because separating from the defilement is hard for you - and hears in acharei matai od a bitter retort to the excuse: and if you say you will purify yourself, when? after you have already gone into exile? Radak reads it the same way and adds the Targumโ€™s rendering, which grants her arca yomin sagiin, a long extension of days. Every other oracle in the chapter ended in a declarative: I will ruin, I will smash, I will scatter. This one ends with a question mark, and the question is addressed to someone still standing there to answer it. The ezor was lo yitzlach lakol, good for nothing, and the jars were smashed past repair, and the leopard cannot change his spots. And then the very last words of the chapter ask how much longer - which is not a thing you ask of a ruined garment or a broken jar. It is a thing you ask of a person who could still answer.


ืคืจืง ื™ืดื’ ยท Chapter 13

ืคืกื•ืง ืืณ ยท Verse 1

Hebrew:

ื›ึผึนื”ึพืึธืžึทึจืจ ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึœื” ืึตืœึทึ—ื™ ื”ึธืœึžื•ึนืšึฐ ื•ึฐืงึธื ึดึคื™ืชึธ ืœึผึฐืšึธึ™ ืึตื–ึฃื•ึนืจ ืคึผึดืฉืึฐืชึผึดึ”ื™ื ื•ึฐืฉื‚ึทืžึฐืชึผึ–ื•ึน ืขึทืœึพืžื‡ืชึฐื ึถึ‘ื™ืšึธ ื•ึผื‘ึทืžึผึทึ–ื™ึดื ืœึนึฅื ืชึฐื‘ึดืึตึฝื”ื•ึผืƒ

English:

Thus GOD said to me: โ€œGo buy yourself a loincloth of linen, and put it around your loins, but do not dip it into water.โ€

The first of Yirmiyahu's great symbolic acts begins with a purchase: buy yourself a linen ezor, wear it on your loins, and do not bring it into water. Rashi and Metzudat David both read the prohibition on water as deliberate sabotage - do not launder it when it fills with sweat, so that it will rot the faster - and Metzudat David adds that wearing it is itself part of the design, so that it will become saturated and decay. Radak raises the question the whole sign turns on: it is possible this was literally done, but the Rambam held that the entire act took place in a prophetic dream; Radak also admits frankly that the clause about water defeats him, and objects that if laundering were the point Scripture would have said lo techabs'hu.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืื–ื•ืจ. ืคื•ืจืฆื™ื "ื˜ ื‘ืœืขื–: ื•ื‘ืžื™ื ืœื ืชื‘ื™ืื”ื•. ืœื›ื‘ืกื• ื›ืฉื™ื”ื ืžืœื ื–ื™ืขื” ื›ื“ื™ ืฉื™ืžื”ืจ ืœื™ืจืงื‘:
a girdle (pourceint in O.F.). and do not put it in water to wash it when it will be soaked with sweat, in order that it hasten to decay.

ืคืกื•ืง ื‘ืณ ยท Verse 2

Hebrew:

ื•ึธืึถืงึฐื ึถึฅื” ืึถืชึพื”ึธืึตื–ึ–ื•ึนืจ ื›ึผึดื“ึฐื‘ึทึฃืจ ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ‘ื” ื•ึธืึธืฉื‚ึดึ–ื ืขึทืœึพืžื‡ืชึฐื ึธึฝื™ืƒย {ืค}

English:

So I bought the loincloth in accordance with GODโ€™s command, and put it about my loins.


ืคืกื•ืง ื’ืณ ยท Verse 3

Hebrew:

ื•ึทื™ึฐื”ึดึงื™ ื“ึฐื‘ึทืจึพื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ›ื” ืึตืœึทึ–ื™ ืฉืึตื ึดึฅื™ืช ืœึตืืžึนึฝืจืƒ

English:

And the word of GOD came to me a second time:

The word of Hashem comes a second time, and Metzudat David notes simply what the second word concerns - bidvar ha'ezor, the matter of the waistcloth. The staged structure matters: the sign is not delivered as a single instruction but unfolds in separate commands over a long stretch of time, so that Yirmiyahu lives inside the parable rather than merely narrating it.

ืคืกื•ืง ื“ืณ ยท Verse 4

Hebrew:

ืงึทึงื— ืึถืชึพื”ึธืึตื–ึ›ื•ึนืจ ืึฒืฉืึถึฅืจ ืงึธื ึดึ–ื™ืชึธ ืึฒืฉืึถึฃืจ ืขึทืœึพืžื‡ืชึฐื ึถึ‘ื™ืšึธ ื•ึฐืงื•ึผืึ™ ืœึตึฃืšึฐ ืคึผึฐืจึธึ”ืชึธื” ื•ึฐื˜ื‡ืžึฐื ึตึฅื”ื•ึผ ืฉืึธึ–ื ื‘ึผึดื ึฐืงึดึฅื™ืง ื”ึทืกึผึธึฝืœึทืขืƒ

English:

โ€œTake the loincloth that you bought, which is about your loins, and go at once to Perath and cover it up there in a cleft of the rock.โ€

Now the second instruction: take the ezor you bought, the one on your loins, and go to Perat and hide it there binkik hasela, in a cleft of the rock. Metzudat David identifies p'ratah plainly as l'nahar P'rat, to the Euphrates river, and reads vetamnehu as concealing it in a crevice of the rock. Radak on verse 1 explains the choice of destination - the Euphrates is the boundary of the land, so that the burial site maps the exile in advance: when they go out from Eretz Yisrael to Bavel, their pride will be ruined there.

ืคืกื•ืง ื”ืณ ยท Verse 5

Hebrew:

ื•ึธืึตืœึตึ•ืšึฐ ื•ึธืึถื˜ึฐืžึฐื ึตึ–ื”ื•ึผ ื‘ึผึดืคึฐืจึธึ‘ืช ื›ึผึทืึฒืฉืึถึ›ืจ ืฆึดื•ึผึธึฅื” ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ–ื” ืื•ึนืชึดึฝื™ืƒ

English:

I went and buried it at Perath, as GOD had commanded me.

Yirmiyahu reports the bare obedience: I went and buried it at Perat as Hashem commanded me. Metzudat David glosses bifrat as etzel nahar P'rat, beside the Euphrates river. If the journey was literal, this single clause covers hundreds of miles on an errand whose only product was a sermon illustration - which is exactly the difficulty that led the commentators to debate whether the act was performed in deed or in prophetic vision.

ืคืกื•ืง ื•ืณ ยท Verse 6

Hebrew:

ื•ึทื™ึฐื”ึดึ•ื™ ืžึดืงึผึตึ–ืฅ ื™ึธืžึดึฃื™ื ืจึทื‘ึผึดึ‘ื™ื ื•ึทื™ึผึนึจืืžึถืจ ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึœื” ืึตืœึทึ—ื™ ืงึšื•ึผื ืœึตึฃืšึฐ ืคึผึฐืจึธึ”ืชึธื” ื•ึฐืงึทึคื— ืžึดืฉืึผึธืึ™ ืึถืชึพื”ึธึฃืึตื–ึ”ื•ึนืจ ืึฒืฉืึถึฅืจ ืฆึดื•ึผึดื™ืชึดึ–ื™ืšึธ ืœึฐื˜ื‡ืžึฐื ื•ึนึพืฉืึธึฝืืƒ

English:

Then, after a long time, GOD said to me, โ€œGo at once to Perath and take there the loincloth that I commanded you to bury there.โ€


ืคืกื•ืง ื–ืณ ยท Verse 7

Hebrew:

ื•ึธืึตืœึตึฃืšึฐ ืคึผึฐืจึธึ”ืชึธื” ื•ึธืึถื—ึฐืคึผึนึ—ืจ ื•ึธึฝืึถืงึผึทื—ึ™ ืึถืชึพื”ึธึฃืึตื–ึ”ื•ึนืจ ืžึดืŸึพื”ึทืžึผึธืงึ–ื•ึนื ืึฒืฉืึถืจึพื˜ึฐืžึทื ึฐืชึผึดึฃื™ื• ืฉืึธึ‘ืžึผึธื” ื•ึฐื”ึดื ึผึตื”ึ™ ื ึดืฉืึฐื—ึทึฃืช ื”ึธืึตื–ึ”ื•ึนืจ ืœึนึฅื ื™ึดืฆึฐืœึทึ–ื— ืœึทื›ึผึนึฝืœืƒย {ืค}

English:

So I went to Perath and dug up the loincloth from the place where I had buried it; and found the loincloth ruined; it was not good for anything.

After many days he returns, digs, and retrieves the belt, and the verdict is total: v'hineh nishchat ha'ezor lo yitzlach lakol. Metzudat David explains that he had to dig because the belt was covered over with earth, and reads nishchat as nitkalkel v'nirkav, spoiled and rotted. Rashi reduces lo yitzlach lakol to eino ra'ui l'chlum, not fit for a thing, and Radak presses the grammar of lakol by comparison with kol melachah lo ta'aseh - not merely unsuited to some purposes but to any purpose at all. A ruined garment has no salvage value, and that total uselessness is the whole force of the sign.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืœื ื™ืฆืœื— ืœื›ืœ. ืื™ื ื• ืจืื•ื™ ืœื›ืœื•ื:
it was of no use for anything It was not fit for anything.

ืคืกื•ืง ื—ืณ ยท Verse 8

Hebrew:

ื•ึทื™ึฐื”ึดึฅื™ ื“ึฐื‘ึทืจึพื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ–ื” ืึตืœึทึฅื™ ืœึตืืžึนึฝืจืƒ

English:

The word of GOD came to me:


ืคืกื•ืง ื˜ืณ ยท Verse 9

Hebrew:

ื›ึผึนึ–ื” ืึธืžึทึฃืจ ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ‘ื” ื›ึผึธึ ื›ึธื” ืึทืฉืึฐื—ึดึžื™ืช ืึถืชึพื’ึผึฐืึงื•ึนืŸ ื™ึฐื”ื•ึผื“ึธึ›ื” ื•ึฐืึถืชึพื’ึผึฐืึฅื•ึนืŸ ื™ึฐืจื•ึผืฉืึธืœึทึ–อึดื ื”ึธืจึธึฝื‘ืƒ

English:

Thus said GOD: Even so will I ruin the overweening pride of Judah and Jerusalem.

The interpretation arrives: kachah ashchit et g'on Yehudah v'et g'on Yerushalayim harav, so will I ruin the pride of Yehudah and the great pride of Yerushalayim. Metzudat David makes the equation explicit - just as the belt was ruined, so will I ruin their pride - and reads harav as hameruba me'od, the exceedingly abundant. Note what is targeted: not the people as such but their g'on, the self-regard that made them think they needed no warning.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืณ ยท Verse 10

Hebrew:

ื”ึธืขึธืึฉ ื”ึทื–ึผึถึจื” ื”ึธืจึธึœืข ื”ึทึฝืžึผึตืึฒื ึดึฃื™ืโ€‰ื€ ืœึดืฉืึฐืžึฃื•ึนืขึท ืึถืชึพื“ึผึฐื‘ึธืจึทึ—ื™ ื”ึทื”ึนึฝืœึฐื›ึดื™ืึ™ ื‘ึผึดืฉืึฐืจึดืจึฃื•ึผืช ืœึดื‘ึผึธึ”ื ื•ึทื™ึผึตืœึฐื›ึ—ื•ึผ ืึทึฝื—ึฒืจึตื™ึ™ ืึฑืœึนื”ึดึฃื™ื ืึฒื—ึตืจึดึ”ื™ื ืœึฐืขื‡ื‘ึฐื“ึธึ–ื ื•ึผืœึฐื”ึดืฉืึฐืชึผึทื—ึฒื•ึบึฃืช ืœึธื”ึถึ‘ื ื•ึดื™ื”ึดื™ึ™ ื›ึผึธืึตื–ึฃื•ึนืจ ื”ึทื–ึผึถึ”ื” ืึฒืฉืึถึฅืจ ืœึนึฝืึพื™ึดืฆึฐืœึทึ–ื— ืœึทื›ึผึนึฝืœืƒย {ืก} ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย 

English:

This wicked people who refuse to heed My bidding, who follow the willfulness of their own hearts, who follow other gods and serve them and worship them, shall become like that loincloth, which is not good for anything.

The indictment names the grounds: this evil people who refuse to hear My words, who walk in the stubbornness of their heart and have gone after other gods to serve them - they shall be like this waistcloth that is good for nothing. Rashi and Radak both keep the referent precise, that what will be like the rotted belt is their g'on, the pride of the previous verse; Metzudat David reads bishrirut libam as whatever their heart shows them and desires. The sequence is cause and effect: the refusal to listen is what reduces the thing to rot.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื•ื™ื”ื™ ื›ืื–ื•ืจ ื”ื–ื”. ื’ืื•ื ื ื™ื”ื™ื” ื›ืื–ื•ืจ ื”ื–ื” ื”ื ืจืงื‘:
and it shall be like this girdle Their pride shall be like this rotten girdle.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื ยท Verse 11

Hebrew:

ื›ึผึดึกื™ ื›ึผึทืึฒืฉืึถืจึฉ ื™ึดื“ึฐื‘ึผึทึจืง ื”ึธืึตื–ึœื•ึนืจ ืึถืœึพืžื‡ืชึฐื ึตื™ึพืึดึ—ื™ืฉื ื›ึผึตึฃืŸ ื”ึดื“ึฐื‘ึผึทึฃืงึฐืชึผึดื™ ืึตึ ืœึทึ ื™ ืึถืชึพื›ึผื‡ืœึพื‘ึผึตึจื™ืช ื™ึดืฉื‚ึฐืจึธืึตึœืœ ื•ึฐืึถืชึพื›ึผื‡ืœึพื‘ึผึตึคื™ืช ื™ึฐื”ื•ึผื“ึธื”ึ™ ื ึฐืึปืึพื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ”ื” ืœึดึฝื”ึฐื™ึฅื•ึนืช ืœึดื™ึ™ ืœึฐืขึธึ”ื ื•ึผืœึฐืฉืึตึฅื ื•ึฐืœึดืชึฐื”ึดืœึผึธึ–ื” ื•ึผืœึฐืชึดืคึฐืึธึ‘ืจึถืช ื•ึฐืœึนึ–ื ืฉืึธืžึตึฝืขื•ึผืƒ

English:

For as a loincloth clings close to a manโ€™s loins, so I brought close to Me the whole House of Israel and the whole House of Judahโ€”declares GODโ€”that they might be My people, for fame, and praise, and splendor. But they would not obey.

Here the sign discloses its tenderness. Ki ka'asher yidbak ha'ezor el motnei ish, ken hidbakti elai et kol beit Yisrael v'et kol beit Yehudah - as a waistcloth clings to a man's loins, so I made the whole house of Israel and the whole house of Yehudah cling to Me, lihyot li l'am ul'shem v'lit'hilah ul'tif'aret. Metzudat David explains that this is precisely why they were compared to a belt, since a belt sits pressed against a man's loins, and reads the fourfold purpose as the good name that was to accrue to them. He also makes v'lo shameu the hinge of the whole sign: they did not listen to My words, and therefore they will be ruined like this waistcloth. The very closeness that was the blessing is what made the rot possible.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื‘ ยท Verse 12

Hebrew:

ื•ึฐืึธืžึทืจึฐืชึผึธึจ ืึฒืœึตื™ื”ึถึœื ืึถืชึพื”ึทื“ึผึธื‘ึธึฃืจ ื”ึทื–ึผึถึ—ื”ย {ืก} ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ื›ึผึนึฝื”ึพืึธืžึทึคืจ ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธื”ึ™ ืึฑืœึนื”ึตึฃื™ ื™ึดืฉื‚ึฐืจึธืึตึ”ืœ ื›ึผื‡ืœึพื ึตึ–ื‘ึถืœ ื™ึดืžึผึธึฃืœึตื ื™ึธึ‘ื™ึดืŸ ื•ึฐืึธืžึฐืจึฃื•ึผ ืึตืœึถึ”ื™ืšึธ ื”ึฒื™ึธื“ึนึ™ืขึทึ™ ืœึนึฃื ื ึตื“ึทึ”ืข ื›ึผึดึฅื™ ื›ื‡ืœึพื ึตึ–ื‘ึถืœ ื™ึดืžึผึธึฅืœึตื ื™ึธึฝื™ึดืŸืƒ

English:

And speak this word to them: Thus said the ETERNAL, the God of Israel: โ€œEvery jar should be filled with wine.โ€ And when they say to you, โ€œDonโ€™t we know that every jar should be filled with wine?โ€

The second sign needs no journey, only a proverb: kol nevel yimalei yayin, every jar is filled with wine - and the people's predictable retort, do we not already know that? Rashi identifies the nevel as an earthenware vessel made for holding wine, and Metzudat David paraphrases the retort as mockery at the obvious. Radak explains why a banality is a prophecy by finding two metaphors in the one image: a jar is filled until the wine soaks into its very walls, so they will be filled with drunkenness from every side, the stupor being a figure for troubles so dense that a man no longer knows what to do - and, worse, when one jar is struck against another both shatter, which is why Scripture uses the verb of nipputz with jars.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื ื‘ืœ. ื›ืœื™ ื—ืจืก ื”ื•ื ื•ืขืฉื•ื™ ืœื”ื›ื ื™ืก ื‘ื• ื™ื™ืŸ:
bottle Heb. ื ื‘ืœ. This is an earthenware vessel, and it is used to hold wine.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื’ ยท Verse 13

Hebrew:

ื•ึฐืึธืžึทืจึฐืชึผึธึจ ืึฒืœึตื™ื”ึถึœื ื›ึผึนึฝื”ึพืึธืžึทึฃืจ ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ—ื” ื”ึดื ึฐื ึดึฃื™ ืžึฐืžึทืœึผึตึฃื ืึถืชึพื›ึผื‡ืœึพื™ึนืฉืึฐื‘ึตึฃื™ ื”ึธืึธึชืจึถืฅ ื”ึทื–ึผึนึŸืืช ื•ึฐืึถืชึพื”ึทืžึผึฐืœึธื›ึดึฃื™ื ื”ึทื™ึผึนืฉืึฐื‘ึดื™ืึฉ ืœึฐื“ึธื•ึดึจื“ ืขึทืœึพื›ึผึดืกึฐืึœื•ึน ื•ึฐืึถืชึพื”ึทื›ึผึนื”ึฒื ึดึฃื™ื ื•ึฐืึถืชึพื”ึทื ึผึฐื‘ึดืึดึ—ื™ื ื•ึฐืึตึ›ืช ื›ึผื‡ืœึพื™ึนืฉืึฐื‘ึตึฅื™ ื™ึฐืจื•ึผืฉืึธืœึธึ–อึดื ืฉืึดื›ึผึธืจึฝื•ึนืŸืƒ

English:

say to them, โ€œThus said GOD: I am going to fill with drunkenness all the inhabitants of this land, and the kings who sit on the throne of David, and the priests and the prophets, and all the inhabitants of Jerusalem.

The proverb is cashed out: I am filling all the inhabitants of this land, and the kings who sit for David on his throne, and the priests and the prophets, and all the inhabitants of Yerushalayim, with shikaron. Metzudat David spells out the metaphor - as a jar is fit to hold wine, so I will fill them with drunkenness, meaning they will be confounded by troubles the way a drunk is confounded by his wine - and names the targets with uncomfortable precision: the kohanim are the priests of the Baal, and the nevi'im are the false prophets. The whole hierarchy is listed, throne to sanctuary, and no rung of it is exempt.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื“ ยท Verse 14

Hebrew:

ื•ึฐื ึดืคึผึทืฆึฐืชึผึดื™ืึฉ ืึดึจื™ืฉื ืึถืœึพืึธื—ึดึœื™ื• ื•ึฐื”ึธืึธื‘ึงื•ึนืช ื•ึฐื”ึทื‘ึผึธื ึดึ›ื™ื ื™ึทื—ึฐื“ึผึธึ–ื• ื ึฐืึปืึพื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ‘ื” ืœึนึฝืึพืึถื—ึฐืžึงื•ึนืœ ื•ึฐืœึนืึพืึธื—ึ›ื•ึผืก ื•ึฐืœึนึฅื ืึฒืจึทื—ึตึ–ื ืžึตื”ึทืฉืึฐื—ึดื™ืชึธึฝืืƒ

English:

And I will smash them one against the other, parents and children alikeโ€”declares GOD; no pity, compassion, or mercy will stop Me from destroying them.โ€

And then the smashing: v'nipatztim ish el achiv, and I will dash them one against another, fathers and sons together, lo echmol v'lo achus v'lo arachem mehashchitam. Rashi explains the verb with the image of striking one vessel against another until they break into small fragments, citing the potter's vessel of Tehillim, and notes that the fathers and sons are dashed against each other too. Metzudat David reads ish el achiv as shattering each one against the one beside him. The triple refusal of pity is the bleakest clause in the chapter, and it says that the ruin will be internal - not only what the enemy does to them but what they do to one another under the weight of it.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื•ื ืคืฆืชื™ื ืื™ืฉ ืืœ ืื—ื™ื•. ืื›ื” ื–ื” ืขืœ ื–ื” ืขื“ ืฉื™ืฉื‘ืจื• ื—ืชื™ื›ื•ืช ื“ืงื•ืช ื›ืžื• ื›ื›ืœื™ ื™ื•ืฆืจ ืชื ืคืฆื (ืชื”ืœื™ื ื‘) ื•ื ืคืฅ ืืช ืขื•ืœืœื™ืš (ืฉื ืงืœื–) ื•ื›ืŸ ื›ืœ ื ื™ืคื•ืฅ ืฉื‘ืžืงืจื: ื•ื”ืื‘ื•ืช ื•ื”ื‘ื ื™ื. ืื ืคืฅ ื–ื” ืืฆืœ ื–ื”:
And I will dash them one against the other I will dash one against the other until they break into small pieces. Cf (Psalms 2:9) "Like a potter's vessel shall you shatter them (ืชื ืคืฆื)" (ibid. 137: 9). "And dash ื•ื ืคืฅ your babes"; and so is every expression of ื ืคื•ืฅ in Scripture. and the fathers and the sons I will dash one against the other.

ืคืกื•ืง ื˜ืดื• ยท Verse 15

Hebrew:

ืฉืึดืžึฐืขึฅื•ึผ ื•ึฐื”ึทืึฒื–ึดึ–ื™ื ื•ึผ ืึทืœึพืชึผึดื’ึฐื‘ึผึธึ‘ื”ื•ึผ ื›ึผึดึฅื™ ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ–ื” ื“ึผึดื‘ึผึตึฝืจืƒ

English:

Attend and give ear; be not haughty, For GOD has spoken.

The tone shifts abruptly from verdict to plea: shimu v'ha'azinu al tigbahu ki Hashem diber. Metzudat David reads al tigbahu as a warning against being high of heart so as not to submit to the Omnipresent. Radak sharpens the arrogance into something very specific - do not suppose that instruction and wisdom are already your own possession and that you have no need to hear God's discipline through His prophets. The pride being named is not political vanity but the intellectual self-sufficiency that makes a prophet unnecessary.

ืคืกื•ืง ื˜ืดื– ยท Verse 16

Hebrew:

ืชึผึฐื ื•ึผึฉ ืœึทื™ื”ึนื•ึธึจื” ืึฑืœึนื”ึตื™ื›ึถึคื ื›ึผึธื‘ื•ึนื“ึ™ ื‘ึผึฐื˜ึถึฃืจึถื ื™ึทื—ึฐืฉืึดึ”ืšึฐ ื•ึผื‘ึฐื˜ึถึ›ืจึถื ื™ึดึฝืชึฐื ึทื’ึผึฐืคึฅื•ึผ ืจึทื’ึฐืœึตื™ื›ึถึ–ื ืขึทืœึพื”ึธึฃืจึตื™ ื ึธึ‘ืฉืึถืฃ ื•ึฐืงึดื•ึผึดื™ืชึถึคื ืœึฐืื•ึนืจึ™ ื•ึฐืฉื‚ึธืžึธึฃื”ึผ ืœึฐืฆึทืœึฐืžึธึ”ื•ึถืช (ื™ืฉื™ืช) [ื•ึฐืฉืึดึ–ื™ืช] ืœึทืขึฒืจึธืคึถึฝืœืƒ

English:

Give honor to the ETERNAL your God Before darkness descends, Before your feet stumble On the mountains in shadowโ€” When you hope for light, And it is turned to darkness And becomes deep gloom.

Tenu laHashem Eloheichem kavod b'terem yachshich - give glory to the Lord your God before it grows dark, before your feet stumble on harei nashef, the mountains of gloom, when you hope for light and He turns it to the shadow of death. Rashi reads harei nashef as harei choshech, the dark mountains on which they will walk into exile, and yitnagfu as stumbling. Metzudat David takes b'terem yachshich as the daylight going dark from the sheer weight of troubles. Radak sharpens the reversal into politics: the light they are hoping for is Egypt, the alliance that was to rescue them, and it is precisely that hope that will be set to tzalmavet. The word b'terem is the pivot of the verse - everything still depends on a window that has not yet closed.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื™ืชื ื’ืคื•. ื™ื›ืฉืœื• ืืฆื•ืคื™"ืจ ื‘ืœืขื–: ื”ืจื™ ื ืฉืฃ. ื”ืจื™ ื—ืฉืš ื‘ืœื›ืชื ื‘ื’ื•ืœื”: ื•ืฉื™ืช ืœืขืจืคืœ. ื›ืžื• ื•ืœืฉื™ืช ืืช ื”ืื•ืจ ืœืขืจืคืœ:
and before your feet stumble Heb. ื™ืชื ื’ืคื• (achopper in French), to stumble. the dark mountains Heb. ื ืฉืฃ, the dark mountains when they go into exile. and making it into a thick cloud Heb. ื•ืฉื™ืช, like ื•ืœืฉื™ืช, and to make the light into a thick cloud.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื– ยท Verse 17

Hebrew:

ื•ึฐืึดืึ™ ืœึนึฃื ืชึดืฉืึฐืžึธืขึ”ื•ึผื”ึธ ื‘ึผึฐืžึดืกึฐืชึผึธืจึดึฅื™ื ืชึผึดื‘ึฐื›ึผึถึฝื”ึพื ึทืคึฐืฉืึดึ–ื™ ืžึดืคึผึฐื ึตึฃื™ ื’ึตื•ึธึ‘ื” ื•ึฐื“ึธืžึนึจืขึท ืชึผึดื“ึฐืžึทึœืข ื•ึฐืชึตืจึทึคื“ ืขึตื™ื ึดื™ึ™ ื“ึผึดืžึฐืขึธึ”ื” ื›ึผึดึฅื™ ื ึดืฉืึฐื‘ึผึธึ–ื” ืขึตึฅื“ึถืจ ื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึฝื”ืƒย {ืก} ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย 

English:

For if you will not give heed, My inmost self must weep, Because of your arrogance; My eye must stream and flow With copious tears, Because GODโ€™s flock Is taken captive.

This is one of the most moving verses in the book, where the prophet's own grief breaks through the oracle: if you will not hear it, bamistarim tivkeh nafshi mipnei gevah, my soul will weep in secret places because of your pride, and my eye will run down with tears, ki nishbah eder Hashem. Radak divides the weeping with real delicacy - nafshi tivkeh bamistarim is inward dread, hidden, while v'eini tidma b'galui is the tears shed openly - so the hidden grief and the public tears are two distinct acts. Rashi offers two readings of mipnei gevah, the greatness of theirs that is to be annulled, or the pride of the kingdom of Heaven that will be handed over to the idols of the Kasdim; Metzudat David takes it as the pride still in them, their refusal to bend, and catches the tense of the thing - he weeps because he already sees the evil that is finding them. The prophet is grieving for something that has not happened yet.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืžืคื ื™ ื’ื•ื”. ืžืคื ื™ ื’ื“ื•ืœื” ืฉืœื›ื ืฉืชืชื‘ื˜ืœ ื“"ื ืžืคื ื™ ื’ืื•ืชื” ืฉืœ ืžืœื›ื•ืช ืฉืžื™ื ืฉืชื ืชืŸ ืœืืœื™ืœื™ื ืฉืœ ื›ืฉื“ื™ื:
because of your pride Because of your greatness which will be curtailed. Another explanation: Because of the pride of the kingdom of Heaven that will be given over to the idols of Babylon.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื— ยท Verse 18

Hebrew:

ืึฑืžึนึฅืจ ืœึทืžึผึถึ›ืœึถืšึฐ ื•ึฐืœึทื’ึผึฐื‘ึดื™ืจึธึ–ื” ื”ึทืฉืึฐืคึผึดึฃื™ืœื•ึผ ืฉืึตึ‘ื‘ื•ึผ ื›ึผึดึคื™ ื™ึธืจึทื“ึ™ ืžึทืจึฐืึฒืฉืึฃื•ึนืชึตื™ื›ึถึ”ื ืขึฒื˜ึถึ–ืจึถืช ืชึผึดึฝืคึฐืึทืจึฐืชึผึฐื›ึถึฝืืƒ

English:

Say to the king and the queen mother, โ€œSit in a lowly spot; For your diadems are abased, Your glorious crowns.โ€

The address turns to the throne: emor lamelech v'lag'virah hashpilu shevu, say to the king and the queen mother, sit low, ki yarad mar'ashoteichem ateret tif'artchem. Rashi identifies them as Yehoyachin and his mother, pointing to the account in Melachim where Yehoyachin went out to Nevuchadnetzar with his mother and his servants and all of them were led into exile; Metzudat David reads hashpilu shevu literally as sitting in a low place bent to the ground rather than on thrones, and takes mar'ashoteichem as their greatness. Radak adds the detail that completes the humiliation - even in exile they were not treated as royalty, since Yehoyachin was put in prison like any commoner.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืœืžืœืš ื•ืœื’ื‘ื™ืจื”. ื™ื”ื•ื™ื›ื™ืŸ ื•ืืžื•: ื™ืจื“ ืžืจืืฉื•ืชื™ื›ื. ื•ื•ืฉื˜ืจื™ ืงืื™"ืฅ ื‘ืœืขื– ืขืœื™ื™ืชื›ื ื›ืžื• ืฉื ืืžืจ (ืžืœื›ื™ื ื‘ ื›ื—) ื•ื™ืฆื ืืœื™ื• ื™ื”ื•ื™ื›ื™ืŸ ื”ื•ื ื•ืืžื• ื•ืขื‘ื“ื™ื• ื•ื›ื•ืœื ื”ื•ืœื™ื›ื ื‘ื’ื•ืœื”:
to the king and to the queen mother Jehoiachin and his mother. your greatness has come down Heb. ืžืจืืฉืชื™ื›ื (vostremijevec in O.F.), your ascent, as it is stated: (II Kings 24:12) "And Jehoiachin... came out to him (sic), he and his mother and his servants," and he led all of them in exile.

ืคืกื•ืง ื™ืดื˜ ยท Verse 19

Hebrew:

ืขึธืจึตึฅื™ ื”ึทื ึผึถึ›ื’ึถื‘ ืกึปื’ึผึฐืจึ–ื•ึผ ื•ึฐืึตึฃื™ืŸ ืคึผึนืชึตึ‘ื—ึท ื”ื‡ื’ึฐืœึธึงืช ื™ึฐื”ื•ึผื“ึธึ›ื” ื›ึผึปืœึผึธึ–ื”ึผ ื”ื‡ื’ึฐืœึธึฅืช ืฉืึฐืœื•ึนืžึดึฝื™ืืƒย {ืก} ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย 

English:

The cities of the Negeb are shut, There is no one to open them; Judah is exiled completely, All of it exiled.

Arei hanegev sugru v'ein poteach - the cities of the south are shut and there is none to open them; Yehudah is carried away captive, all of it. Metzudat David reads the shutting as the desolation of ruin: since nobody is left there, who would open the city gates? Radak makes the same point from the other side, that a ruined city has no one going out and no one coming in. The commentators divide over hoglat sh'lomim: Metzudat David takes it as galut sh'leimah, a complete exile, contrasting Yehoyachin's deportation which left many of the princes and the common people behind with Tzidkiyahu's in which all would go; Rashi offers both that Yehoyachin went out peaceably rather than fighting, and, following the Targum, that sh'lomim means recompense - the full payment of their sins received.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืขืจื™ ื”ื ื’ื‘ ืกื’ืจื•. ืœืคื ื™ ื”ื‘ืื™ืŸ ืขืœื™ื”ื ืžืŸ ื”ืฆืคื•ืŸ ืขืจื™ ื"ื™ ืกื’ื•ืจื•ืช ืžืื™ืžืช ื ื‘ื•ื›ื“ื ืฆืจ: ื”ื’ืœืช ืฉืœื•ืžื™ื. ืœื ื™ืœื—ื ื™ื”ื•ื™ื›ื™ืŸ ื›ื™ ืœืฉืœื•ื ื™ืฆื ื•ื™ื’ืœื”ื•, ืœ"ื ืฉืœื•ืžื™ื ื’ืจื“ื•ื ืืžื™ื "ืฅ ื‘ืœืขื– ื›ืœื•ืžืจ ืชืฉืœื•ื ืขื•ื•ื ื ื•ื›ืŸ ืช"ื™ ืื™ืชืงื‘ืœื• ืชื•ืฉืœืžืช ื—ื•ื‘ื™ื”ื•ืŸ:
The cities of the South are shut up before those coming upon them from the north [i.e.,] the cities of Eretz Israel are shut up because of fear of Nebuchadnezzar. she was exiled peacefully Jehoiachin will not wage war, but he will come out peacefully, and he will exile them. Another interpretation. ืฉืœื•ืžื™ื (gueredon in O.F.), reprisal. That is to say: she was exiled as the recompense for their iniquity. And Jonathan rendered in this manner: the recompense of their sins was received.

ืคืกื•ืง ื›ืณ ยท Verse 20

Hebrew:

(ืฉืื™) [ืฉื‚ึฐืึคื•ึผ] ืขึตึฝื™ื ึตื™ื›ึถืึ™ (ื•ืจืื™) [ื•ึผืจึฐืึ”ื•ึผ] ื”ึทื‘ึผึธืึดึ–ื™ื ืžึดืฆึผึธืคึ‘ื•ึนืŸ ืึทื™ึผึตึ—ื” ื”ึธืขึตึ™ื“ึถืจึ™ ื ึดืชึผึทืŸึพืœึธึ”ืšึฐ ืฆึนึ–ืืŸ ืชึผึดืคึฐืึทืจึฐืชึผึตึฝืšึฐืƒ

English:

Raise your eyes and behold Those who come from the north: Where are the sheep entrusted to you, The flock you took pride in?

Seu eineichem ur'u haba'im mitzafon - lift your eyes and see those coming from the north - ayeh ha'eder nitan lach, tzon tif'artech? Rashi says this will be said to Yerushalayim after they are exiled. Metzudat David addresses the question directly to the king and the queen mother of the previous verse: where is the people of Yehudah that was given you to be their shepherd and king, and where are the sheep of your glory - have they not gone into exile? Radak reads it the same way, that the command is to the king and the queen mother and to the great officers exiled with Yehoyachin, since they too were among the shepherds. A shepherd is being asked to account for his flock, and the question itself is the verdict.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืฉืื• ืขื™ื ื™ื›ื ื•ืจืื•. ืืช ื”ื‘ืื™ื ืขืœื™ื›ื ืžืฆืคื•ืŸ: ืื™ื” ื”ืขื“ืจ ื ืชืŸ ืœืš. ืื—ืจ ืฉื™ื’ืœื• ื™ืืžืจ ืœื™ืจื•ืฉืœื™ื ื›ืŸ:
Lift your eyes and see those coming upon you from the North. Where is the flock that was given you After they are exiled, this will be said to Jerusalem.

ืคืกื•ืง ื›ืดื ยท Verse 21

Hebrew:

ืžึทื”ึพืชึผึนึฝืืžึฐืจึดื™ึ™ ื›ึผึดึฝื™ึพื™ึดืคึฐืงึนึฃื“ ืขึธืœึทึ”ื™ึดืšึฐ ื•ึฐึ ืึทึ ืชึผึฐ ืœึดืžึผึทึจื“ึฐืชึผึฐ ืึนืชึธึฅื ืขึธืœึทึ›ื™ึดืšึฐ ืึทืœึผึปืคึดึ–ื™ื ืœึฐืจึนึ‘ืืฉื ื”ึฒืœึคื•ึนื ื—ึฒื‘ึธืœึดื™ืึ™ ื™ึนึฝืื—ึฑื–ึ”ื•ึผืšึฐ ื›ึผึฐืžึ–ื•ึน ืึตึฅืฉืึถืช ืœึตื“ึธึฝื”ืƒ

English:

What will you say when they appoint as your heads Those among you whom you trained to be tame? Shall not pangs seize you Like a woman in childbirth?

Mah tomri ki yifkod alayich - what will you say when He visits upon you? - and the answer is that the sentence is self-administered: v'at limadt otam alayich alufim l'rosh, you yourself taught them to be chiefs over you. Rashi reads this as the embassies sent to the Kasdim to fetch their idols, citing Yechezkel, and alternatively as Chizkiyahu showing the envoys of Merodach Baladan his entire treasure house; Metzudat David follows the second reading and draws out the consequence, that the display of the treasury inflamed Bavel's appetite and set them coming back again and again to take it; Radak reads the verb as referring to the enemy's visitation and points to Achaz sending the king of Ashur the words I am your servant and your son, come up and save me. On every reading the indictment is identical: the empire coming to destroy you is the empire you invited in. And then the birth pangs, chavalim yochezuch k'mo eshet leidah, which Radak notes are here inverted, since the order of such things is overturned.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืžื” ืชืืžืจื™ ื›ื™ ื™ืคืงื•ื“. ื”ืงื‘"ื” ืขืœื™ืš: ืœืžื“ืช ืื•ืชื ืขืœื™ืš ืืœื•ืคื™ื ืœืจืืฉ. ืฉืœื—ืชื ืืœื™ื”ื ืžืœืื›ื™ื ืœื›ืฉื“ื™ื™ื ืœื”ื‘ื™ื ืžืฉื ืืœื™ืœื™ื ืฉืœื”ื ืœืขื‘ื“ื ื›ืžื• ืฉื ื' (ื‘ื™ื—ื–ืงืืœ ื›ืดื’:ื˜ืดื–) ื•ืชืขื’ื‘ื” ืขืœื™ื”ื ืœืžืจืื” ืขื™ื ื™ื” ื•ืชืฉืœื— ืžืœืื›ื™ื ืืœื™ื”ื ื›ืฉื“ื™ืžื”, ื“"ื ืœืžื“ืช ืื•ืชื ืขืœื™ืš ืืœื•ืคื™ื ื—ื–ืงื™ื”ื• ืฉื”ืจืื” ืœืฉืœื•ื—ื™ ืžืจื•ื“ืš ื‘ืœืื“ืŸ ืืช ื›ืœ ื‘ื™ืช ื ื›ืืชื” (ื™ืฉืขื™ื”ื• ืœืดื˜:ืืณ):
What will you say when He visits i.e., when the Holy One, blessed be He, visits upon you? when you accustomed them to be princes at your head You sent emissaries to the Chaldees to bring their idols from there to worship them, as it is written in Ezekiel (23 16): "And she lusted for them to the sight of her eyes, and she sent emissaries to them, to the Chaldees." Another explanation of "you accustomed them to be princes over you": Hezekiah who showed the emissaries of Merodach-baladan his entire treasure house (Isaiah 39:2, II Kings 20:13).

ืคืกื•ืง ื›ืดื‘ ยท Verse 22

Hebrew:

ื•ึฐื›ึดึคื™ ืชึนึฝืืžึฐืจึดื™ึ™ ื‘ึผึดืœึฐื‘ึธื‘ึตึ”ืšึฐ ืžึทื“ึผึ–ื•ึผืขึท ืงึฐืจึธืึปึฃื ึดื™ ืึตึ‘ืœึผึถื” ื‘ึผึฐืจึนึงื‘ ืขึฒื•ึบื ึตึ›ืšึฐ ื ึดื’ึฐืœึฅื•ึผ ืฉืื•ึผืœึทึ–ื™ึดืšึฐ ื ึถื—ึฐืžึฐืกึฅื•ึผ ืขึฒืงึตื‘ึธึฝื™ึดืšึฐืƒ

English:

And when you ask yourself, โ€œWhy have these things befallen me?โ€ It is because of your great iniquity That your skirts are lifted up, Your limbs exposed.

When you ask in your heart madua k'ra'uni eleh, why have these things befallen me, the answer is b'rov avonech - and the image is the public stripping of a woman, nig'lu shulayich nechmesu akevayich. Rashi explains shulayich as the hems of the garments, turned up from below when a woman is stripped in humiliation, and reads nechmesu akevayich both as her ways being cut off and as travelers having ceased. Metzudat David reads it as the great disgrace of a woman led out bare and barefoot. Radak lifts the image out of the physical entirely: this is a mashal for k'neset Yisrael, who was nistaret, sheltered under the wings of God and honored in her own land, and is now exiled with her covering removed and her shame uncovered before every eye in the lands of strangers. The imagery is the language of a nation stripped of the protection that made it dignified.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืฉื•ืœื™ืš. ืฉื™ืคื•ืœื™ ื”ื‘ื’ื“ื™ื ื˜ื™"ืฉ ืื•ืจืœื"ืฉ ื‘ืœืขื– ื›ืฉืžืคืฉื™ื˜ื™ืŸ ืืช ื”ืืฉื” ื“ืจืš ื‘ื–ื™ื•ืŸ ืžื”ืคื›ื™ืŸ ื—ืœื•ืงื” ืžืœืžื˜ื” ืœืžืขืœื”: ื ื—ืžืกื• ืขืงื‘ื™ืš. ื ื’ื–ืจื• ื“ืจื›ื™ืš, ื ื—ืžืกื• ื›ืžื• ื•ื™ื—ืžืก ื›ื’ืŸ ืฉื•ื›ื• (ืื™ื›ื” ื‘ืณ:ื•ืณ): ืขืงื‘ื™ืš. ื˜ืจืฆื™"ืฉ ื‘ืœืขื– ืคืกืงื• ืขื•ื‘ืจื™ ื“ืจื›ื™ื:
your skirts The skirts of the garments (tes ourlets in French), your hems. When a woman is stripped in a humiliating way, they turn her chemise upside down. your steps cut off Your ways are cut off. ื ื—ืžืกื• is like (Lam. 2:6) "And He cut off (ื•ื™ื—ืžึนืก) like a garden His dwelling." your steps (traces in O.F.) Travelers have stopped.

ืคืกื•ืง ื›ืดื’ ยท Verse 23

Hebrew:

ื”ึฒื™ึทื”ึฒืคึนึคืšึฐ ื›ึผื•ึผืฉืึดื™ึ™ ืขื•ึนืจึ”ื•ึน ื•ึฐื ึธืžึตึ–ืจ ื—ึฒื‘ึทืจึฐื‘ึผึปืจึนืชึธึ‘ื™ื• ื’ึผึทืึพืึทืชึผึถืึ™ ืชึผื•ึผื›ึฐืœึฃื•ึผ ืœึฐื”ึตื™ื˜ึดึ”ื™ื‘ ืœึดืžึผึปื“ึตึ–ื™ ื”ึธืจึตึฝืขึทืƒ

English:

Can the Cushites change their skin, Or leopards their spots? Just as much can you do good, Who are practiced in doing evil!

Im yahafoch Kushi oro v'namer chavarburotav, gam atem tuchlu l'heitiv limudei hare'a - can a Kushi change his skin or a leopard his spots? So can you do good, who are schooled in evil. Rashi explains chavarburotav as the leopard's markings and says flatly that it is impossible for them to change. Radak presses the logic: blackness in the Kushi is a natural property and not an accident, and will never leave him, and so too wickedness cannot depart from you, as though it were natural in you - so thoroughly have you learned and habituated yourselves to evil that it has become for you a natural thing; he glosses limudei as murgal, habituated. That word carries the whole theological weight, since nothing described here is congenital. And Metzudat David refuses to let the verse close the door: he calls it inyan guzma v'haflagah, hyperbole and overstatement, meaning b'koshi rav tishtanu, that you will change only with very great difficulty. Difficult is not impossible - but difficult said to a people who believe themselves fine is the more frightening word.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื›ื•ืฉื™. ืฉื ืื“ื ืฉื—ื•ืจ ื•ืงื•ืจื™ืŸ ืžื"ืจ ื‘ืœืขื–: ื•ื ืžืจ. ืœื™ืืคืจ"ื˜ ื‘ืœืขื–: ื—ื‘ืจื‘ื•ืจื•ืชื™ื•. ื”ื ืžืจ ืžื ื•ืžืจ ื”ื•ื ื•ื”ื ื”ื—ื‘ืจื‘ื•ืจื•ืช ื˜ืง"ืฉ ื‘ืœืขื– ื•ืื™ ืืคืฉืจ ืฉื™ื”ืคื›ื•: ื”ืจืข. ื›ืžื• ืœื”ืจืข:
a Cushite Heb. ื›ื•ืฉื™, the name of a black man, who is called Maure in French, a Moor. or a leopard leopard in French. his spots The leopard is spotted, and they are the spots (taches in French), and it is impossible for them to change. to do evil Heb. ื”ืจืข, like ืœื”ืจืข, to do evil.

ืคืกื•ืง ื›ืดื“ ยท Verse 24

Hebrew:

ื•ึทืึฒืคึดื™ืฆึตึ–ื ื›ึผึฐืงึทืฉืึพืขื•ึนื‘ึตึ‘ืจ ืœึฐืจึ–ื•ึผื—ึท ืžึดื“ึฐื‘ึผึธึฝืจืƒ

English:

So I will scatter you like straw that flies Before the desert wind.

Va'afitzem k'kash over l'ruach midbar - I will scatter them like chaff driven before the desert wind. Metzudat David explains the precision of the image: the desert wind meets nothing standing in its way to hold it back, so the chaff moves with great speed and nothing arrests it. Radak reads the scattering both as speed and as destination, since there is desert between Yerushalayim and Bavel, so they will be driven out of their cities to a remote place. After the belt that rotted and the jars that shattered, the third image is of something so weightless that the wind disposes of it without effort.

ืคืกื•ืง ื›ืดื” ยท Verse 25

Hebrew:

ื–ึถึฃื” ื’ื•ึนืจึธืœึตึงืšึฐ ืžึฐื ึธืชึพืžึดื“ึผึทึ›ื™ึดืšึฐ ืžึตืึดืชึผึดึ–ื™ ื ึฐืึปืึพื™ึฐื”ึนื•ึธึ‘ื” ืึฒืฉืึถืจึ™ ืฉืึธื›ึทึฃื—ึทืชึผึฐ ืื•ึนืชึดึ”ื™ ื•ึทึฝืชึผึดื‘ึฐื˜ึฐื—ึดึ–ื™ ื‘ึผึทืฉืึผึธึฝืงึถืจืƒ

English:

This shall be your lot, Your measured portion from Me โ€”declares GOD. Because you forgot Me And trusted in falsehood,

Zeh goralech m'nat midayich me'iti - this is your lot, the portion of your measures from Me, because you forgot Me and trusted in falsehood. Rashi reduces the phrase to three words, midah k'neged midah, measure for measure. Metzudat David completes the equation with a bitter symmetry: you trusted in Egypt, which is falsehood, and forgot Me, and therefore I too will forget you. Radak spells the reciprocity out at length - in the measure you measured, I measured to you; you turned Me the neck and not the face, and I hid My face from you. The punishment is not an imposition from outside but the mirror of the act.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืžื ืช ืžื“ื™ืš. ื—ืœืง ืžื“ื•ืชื™ืš ืžื“ื” ื›ื ื’ื“ ืžื“ื”:
the portion of your measures The portion of your measures, a measure for a measure.

ืคืกื•ืง ื›ืดื• ยท Verse 26

Hebrew:

ื•ึฐื’ึทืึพืึฒื ึดึ›ื™ ื—ึธืฉื‚ึทึฅืคึฐืชึผึดื™ ืฉืื•ึผืœึทึ–ื™ึดืšึฐ ืขึทืœึพืคึผึธื ึธึ‘ื™ึดืšึฐ ื•ึฐื ึดืจึฐืึธึ–ื” ืงึฐืœื•ึนื ึตึฝืšึฐืƒ

English:

I in turn will lift your skirts over your face And your shame shall be seen.

V'gam ani chasafti shulayich al panayich v'nir'ah k'lonech - I too have stripped your skirts over your face, and your disgrace is seen. Rashi reads it as uncovering the hems of the garments and turning them over the face. Metzudat David makes the logic of the figure explicit: because you played the harlot after idols, I will bring upon you the kind of great disgrace inflicted on a harlot, and since she was compared to a harlot the language of her humiliation is used. Radak says only that the verse is self-explanatory, having already expounded the same image at verse 22. The note to hold onto is his reading there, that what is being stripped away is the shelter of divine protection, and the exposure is the exile itself - a people made visible in its helplessness before the nations.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ื—ืฉืคืชื™ ืฉื•ืœื™ืš. ื’ื™ืœื™ืชื™ ืฉื™ืคื•ืœื™ ื‘ื’ื“ื™ืš ืœื”ืคื›ื ืขืœ ืคื ื™ืš:
have uncovered your skirts I have uncovered the hems of your garments upon your face.

ืคืกื•ืง ื›ืดื– ยท Verse 27

Hebrew:

ื ึดืึปืคึทึคื™ึดืšึฐ ื•ึผืžึดืฆึฐื”ึฒืœื•ึนืชึทึ™ื™ึดืšึฐึ™ ื–ึดืžึผึทึฃืช ื–ึฐื ื•ึผืชึตึ”ืšึฐ ืขึทืœึพื’ึผึฐื‘ึธืขื•ึนืชึ™ ื‘ึผึทืฉื‚ึผึธื“ึถึ”ื” ืจึธืึดึ–ื™ืชึดื™ ืฉืึดืงึผื•ึผืฆึธึ‘ื™ึดืšึฐ ืึฅื•ึนื™ ืœึธืšึฐึ™ ื™ึฐืจึฃื•ึผืฉืึธืœึทึ”อึดื ืœึนึฃื ืชึดื˜ึฐื”ึฒืจึดึ”ื™ ืึทื—ึฒืจึตึฅื™ ืžึธืชึทึ–ื™ ืขึนึฝื“ืƒย {ืก} ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย 

English:

I behold your adulteries, Your lustful neighing, Your unbridled depravity, your vile acts On the hills of the countryside. Woe to you, O Jerusalem, Who will not be pure! How much longer shall it be?

The chapter closes with the charge and a question: your adulteries and your neighings and the lewdness of your harlotry, your abominations on the hills of the field - oy lach Yerushalayim lo tit'hari, acharei matai od. Radak states at the outset the rule that should govern every such image in the book: the whole matter of ni'uf is a mashal for avodah zarah. Rashi hears the mitzhalot as the neighing of lustful horses; Metzudat David reads them as raised voices of frivolous joy and the shikutzim as the idols on the hilltop shrines, and reads lo tit'hari as a refusal rather than an incapacity - you do not want to be purified after you have been defiled, because it is hard for you to part from the defilement - hearing in acharei matai od a retort to the excuse: and if you say you will purify yourself, when? after you have already gone into exile? Radak reads it the same way and cites the Targum, which grants her a long extension of days. Every other oracle in the chapter ended in a declarative - I will ruin, I will smash, I will scatter. This one ends in a question, and a question is addressed to someone still standing there to answer it.
โ–ถCommentaries (1)
ืจืฉืดื™Rashi
ืžืฆื”ืœื•ืชื™ืš. ื›ืฆื”ืœืช ืกื•ืกื™ื ื ื•ืืคื™ื: ืื—ืจื™ ืžืชื™. ืชื˜ื”ืจื™ ืขื•ื“:
your neighings like the neighing of adulterous horses. After when will you ever become purified?

โ† Jeremiah 12 | Jeremiah 14 โ†’

Back to Jeremiah | Back to Nach Yomi